1. Smt.C.Rukmini W/o.late Ramulu v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstalces stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus decraring the inaction of the 7th respondent taking action against the Respondents No.g to 20 who are iflega y occupied the rand of the petitic'ners and threatened to dispossess and kifl the petitioners herein as wholly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequertly direct the respondent No.7 to consider the application of the petitionerr; dated 1 0-8-201 7 l.A. NO:1 oF 2017 WPMP. No: 234 oF 20'17 Pel.ition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidevit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to direct th€' Respondent No. 7 to consider the representation of petitioners dated 11-8-2017 in the interest of justice' Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI K GANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos' 1 to 8 : SRI M' SRINIVAS' AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos' 9 to 20 : --- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI ORDER: This writ Petition is filed with the following relief: "...fo issue a writ, order or direction' more particularly one in iii ,"t'n of Writ of Mandamus' declaring the inaction if iie /n respondent taking action against the Responderlts No'9 fo 20 who are iltegatly occ.upied the tand of the petitioners and threatened fo dispossess and kittini ietitioners herein as whotty illeggl' arbitrary and in'iiofriin of principtes of nattural iustice and airect the respondgnt 19.7^to^consider "on""qi"itty tne appiiainn or the petitioners dated 10-8-2017....." 2. Heard K.Gani Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.lvl.srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents No'1 to 8'

3.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, despite a representation dated 10.08.2017, the respondent No'7 failed to take action against the unofficial respondents and allegedly threatened to kill the petitioners. Aggrieved by such inaction and conduct, the petitioners have approached this court seeking appropriate directions

3.2. He further submits that, by an interim order dated 28'08'2017 ' this court had directed respondent No.7 to register a crime based on the said representation. However, it is contended that no further information regarding compliance or subsequent proceedings has 2 been plar:ed before this Court. Hence, the learned counsel prays that apprr:priate directions be issued

4.1. Leerrned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for respondents No.1 to 8, submits that in compliance with the interim direction issued by this Court, a case was registered as Crime ttlo.700 of 2017, based on the representation dated

10.08.2017 submitted by the petitioner. lt is further submitted that, after due. investigation, a charge sheet was filed, and the case has been taken cognizance of and numbered as C.C. No.49313 of 2019 on the file of the learned XIV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First CIass, Kukatpally. The matter is currently pending for examination on 10.1 1.2025.

4.2. ln view of the above developments, he submits that the grievance of the petitioners has been effectively redressed, as the investigertion has been completed and the matter is now before the competernt criminal court. Accordingly, it is prayed that the writ petition be dismissed as having become infructuous.

5. I l'rave perused the material on record.

6. Ttre grievance of the petitioners, as set out in the writ petition, is that respondent No.7 failed to act on their representation dated 3

10.08.2017 by not taking appropriate action against the unofficial respondents. However, from the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, it is evident that pursuant to the interim order of this Court, the police authorities have registered Crime No.700 of 2017, conducted a detailed investigation, and filed a charge sheet, which has culminated in C.C. No.49313 of 2019, presently pending before the learned XIV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kukatpally for trial.

7. This sequence of events clearly establishes that the respondents have acted upon the petitioner's representation and that the grievance raised in the writ petition stands effectively addressed.

8. ln view of the above factual position, this Court is of the considered opinion that no further adjudication is warranted in the present matter. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K.B HAVANI SWAMY STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER to,, ,n" principar secretary for Home, Department secretariat, The state of " ietangana, Hyderabad' 2. TheCommissioner of Police Cyberabad' R'R'District'' 3. The Asst. Commissioner of Potice Balanagar' R'R'District'' 4. The District Collector Ranga Reddy District''

5. Tht; Revenue Divisional Officer Malkajgiri, R.R.District., 6. Thr: Tahsildar, Quthbullapur Mandal, Medchal District. 7. The Station House Officer Jagadgirigutta, PS, Cyberabad, - 8. lhg Qgqu.ty commissioner, G.H.M.c., Gajularamaram, euthbullapur Mandal, R.Fl. District. Itt f

9. One CC to SRI K GANI REDDY, Advocate IOPUC] 10.Two ccs to GP FoR HOME, High court for the state of relangana. tourl 1 1. Two CD Copies PVL BM YV HIGH ISOURT DATED i1611012025 I \ HES 1 .t *jr'n 16 [1: B ltl16 * * ORDER WP.No.28351 of 2017 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \lr coc4 fr--