1. Sajid Khan v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 lo 4 to mutate the names of the petitioners in online revenue records by issuing pattadar passbooks and title deeds in connection with theagrl landssituatedinSyNo. l92toanextentof Ac.3.04 lytsoutof Ac.4.04gts situated at t-ingala Village, Kannepalli tt/andal, Mancherial tlistrict basing on the Order passed by the Revenue Divisional officer, Mancherial in File No. Gt37ffil2}12, dated 26.03.2016 and representation dated 15.10.2025 of the petitioners, pencling disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.PANDAIAH Counselfor the Respondents No.1to4: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.5&6 : The Court made the following: ORDER (: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E'V'VENUGOPAL o ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed praying this Court to declare the action of respondent Nos'2 to 4 in not considering the representation' dated l5'lO'2O25 made by the petitioners seekingformutationoftheirnamesintherevenuerecordsin terms of the order passed by respondent No'3 in File No.G/ 378312012' dated 26'03'2016 in respect of the land admeasuring Acs'3'04 guntas out of Acs'4'04 guntas in Sy.No.192 situated at Lingala Village' Kannepalli Mandal' Mancherial District as illegal' arbitrary' against the principles of naturaljusticeandviolativeofArticles14,lg,2land.300-Aof the Constitution of Ind'ia and consequently' prayed for other aPProPriate reliefs' 2. Heard' Sri N'Pandaiah' learned' counsel for the petitioners and" Sri L.Ravinder' learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and with their consent' thisWritPetitionisbeingtakenupfordisposalattheadmission stage.

3.Learned.counselforthepetitionerswouldsubmitthatthe e4petitioners-a?EtheabsoluteownersandpoSSeSSorSof i 2 wo:n001\Y;:s agricultur-al land to an extent of Acs.3.O4 guntas in Sy.No.192 situated at Lingara v,rage, Kannepalri Manda.r, Mancheriar District' Learned counser for the petitioners wourd further submit that, when the unofficial respondents, along with some others' are illega'y interfering into the lands of the petitioners by disturbing the agricultural operations without having any right and titre, the petitioners have approached respondent No.3 and filed a case, which was humbered as Fire No.G7,37g 3/2012. After verificatio. of the records, respondent No.3 uid.e order, dated 26.03.2016, set aside the 13_B certilicates issued in favour of the pattadars in Sy.Nos.2O, lTT, 1g2, 274 and 214. Learned counser for the petitioners wourd further submit that, thereafter, the pefitioners made representation, dated L5'10'2025 seeking for mutation of their names in the revenue records in terms of trre order passed by respondent No.3 in F,e No'G/37g3/20r2, dated 26.03.2016 in respect of the Iand admeasuring Acs'3'04 guntas out of Acs.4.04 guntas in Sy.No.192, situated at Lingala Village, Kannepaili Mandal, Mancheriar Disrrict. The grievance of the petitioners is that, even after receipt ol the said representation, the official respondents did not consicier the same. TT=- 3 EVV, J Wp_33007 _2025

4. Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, has submitted that the petitioners have not made the online application in appropriate module of Bhu Bharati Portal and if the petitioners make fresh online application duly enclosing all the necessary documents, the respondent authorities would consider the same

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court, without going into the merits and demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition permitting the petitioners to make a fresh online apprication in appropriate module of Bhu Bharati portar and on such apprication being made by the petitioners, if it furfirs all the requirements under the provisions of the Terangana Bhu Bharati (Records of Rights in Land) Act, 2025, respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to consider the same after issuing notice to all the concerned including the unofficiar respondents and affording an opportunity of personar hearing to them and pass appropriate orders in accordance with raw within a period of eight (os) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the said apprication. Since this Court has directed the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to , l 4 EVV, J Wp-33007-2025 consider r.he application of the petitioners and pass necessary orders thereon duiy putting all the interested persolls, including the unofficial respondents herein, on notice' notice to the unofficial r:espondents ir-r the present writ petition is dispensed with. 6 Accor:dingll', this Writ Petition is disposed of There shall be no order as to costs

7. Miscellaneous petitions' if an-Y- pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed' Sd/.K BHAVAN I SWAMY TANT REGISTRAR ITTRUE COPY// N OFFICER Principal Secretary' *"^:":;, -^r^?\, eoreflue Department, secretarrat' Hyderabad To, '-', . District at Mancherial 2. The Disrrict collector' lvlanchertat:^"::;o,",.'"", 'n" 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer' Kannepalli Divisior 4. The Tahsildar' Kannepalli Mandalam' Mancherial District 5. One CC to SRI N PANDAIAH' Advocate' IOPUCI Mancheriat District 6'f33r!"t."o'FoRREVENuE'HigncourtforthestateofTelangana

7. Two CD CoPies' BSK PMK w 1 : , HIGH COURT DATED i3111012025 \ I ORDER WP.No.33007 of 2025 Ili: $r t1ril m z * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WTTHOUT COSTS 1 0\ \\ )p