The High Court · 2025

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad.

2. Smt. Neema Nitesh Zalwar, Wo.Nitesh Radha Krishna hlwar,Aged about Shivaji Nagar, 42 yea$, Occ. Housewife, R/o Flat No.g, Padma Aparttnent, R.P. Road, Secunderabad. ... Respondent/Respondent ...RespondenUDe-facto Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circurnstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for records pertaining to C.C.No.3560/2021 on the file of XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Mahoranjan Complex. and on the perusal of the same be pleased to quash the same as against the Petitioners.. l.A. NO: 1OF 2025:

1. Smt. Neema Nitesh Zalwar, Wo.Nitesh Radha Krishna Zalwar, Aged about 42 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o Flat No.9, Padma Apartment, Shivaji Nagar, R.P. Road, Secunderabad. ...RespondenUDe-facto Complainant in l.A No.1 and 2 of 2O2S D 1. Nitesh Radha Krishna Zalwar, S/o. Dr.Radha Krishna Zalwar, Aged about4l y-ears, Occ. Architect, C/o. Zalwar Hospital, Sarafa Maiket, Sillod, Aurangab;ad, Maharashtra.

2. Dr. Radha Krishna Zalwar, S/o.Namdev Zalwar, Clo. Zalwar Hospital, Aged gpgut 7.C' years, Occ. Doctor, Sarafa Market, Sillod, Aurangabad, Maharashlra.

3. Smt. Kunti Radha Krishna Zalwar, Wo.Dr.Radha Krishna Zalwar, Aged about _ Occ- Nurse, Clo. Zalwar Hospital, Sarafa Market, Sillod, Q5 yeap, Aurangabad, Maharashtra.

4. The State of Telangana at Petitioner/Accused No.1 to 3 in l.A No.l and 2 ot 2O25 , Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of .RespondenURespondent in l.A No.l and 2 of 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner and the Respondent No.1-3 to compound the offences, and be pleased in C.C.No.3560/2021 pending on the file of XV ACMM at Manoranjan Complex, Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition unrler Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to compromise as per terms and conditions mentioned in Memorandum of Llnderstanding dated 17103t2O25 in C.C. No. 3560/2021pending on the file of XV ACMM at Manoranjan Complex, Hyderabad. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crimirral Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Apurva M Gokhale, Advocate for the Petitioner and Additional Public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondenl No.1 and of Sri M/s.MV Rajkumar Gabriel, Adyocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.l and 2 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.14095 of 2025 This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitionets/accused Nos.1 to 3 under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in CC.No.3560 of 2021 on the file of XV Addltional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498-A of IPC and Sections 3, 4 & 6 of DP Act.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel for the petitionersas well as respondent No.2 that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.l & 2 of 2025 has been filed by respondent No.2 to record compromise between them.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the compromise petition.

4. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vide orders dated 30.10.2025 2 ETD. J l.A.No.r.l & 2 ot 2025 i,tl*n Ctb.No.rt (NS ol N2s passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identiff the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal SeMces Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secret:ry of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted ,a report dabd 07.'11.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion, entered into compromis:.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in CC.No.i|56O of 2021 on the fite of XV Additionat Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, registered against the petitionersi/accused Nos.1 to 3 are hereby quashed subject to the petitionerVaccused are paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.521g8926219, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (2OO7O), IFSC Code:SB|NOO2OO7O, MICR r.F--.r--€r' "f/ ': 1// '#i "rJ 3 ETD. J l.A-Ndr.'l & 2 of U)25 NaN C,b.Nartt(NSdN25 No.500004057), within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD'. T. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The xvAdditional chief Metropotitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. 2. The station House officer, wps North zone police Siation, Hyderabad. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the state of ielangana, at 4. One CC to SriApurva M Gokhate, Advocate tOpUCI 5. One CC to M/s.MV Rajkumar Gabriet, Advocate tOpUCI 6. Two CD Copies Hyderabad. [OUT] /fu"" (Along with a copy of Joint Compromise Memo) Note : TotalAmount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by SriApurva M Gokhate, Counselfor the Petitioner as directeo nyihe Hon'ble Court vide order dated 21.11.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five thouland only) to the !"q"]qry, Telangana High court Legal services committee, Hyderabad ano; Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) to the Director, Sainik Wetfare, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No.150825 of 2025, dated 24-12-2025. T'. HIGH COURT DATED:2'111112025 COMMON ORDER l.A N'Os.l and 2 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.14095 ot 2025 lttE s rJ 1B rrB 21126 * * ALLOWING THE I.A NOs.l and 2 ot ZA2S ln/and CRLP.No.14095 of 2025 \ t' :! i" , ".{ We (Memorandum of Criminal Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS) HIGHCoURTFoRTHESTATEoFTELANGANA AT IryDERABAD Criminal Petition No. Against C,C. No. 3560 oF 202r of 2025 (On the file of Hon'ble XV ACMM at Manoranjan \- Between: Complex, HYderabad)

1. Nitesh Radha Krishna z,aTwat S/o. Dr. Radha Krishna zalwar, Aged about 41 Years, Ogc: Architect, CIo. Zalwar Hospital,' Sarafa Market, S itlod, Aurangabad, Maharashtra' _(..

2. Dr. Radha Krishna Z-alwat S/or Namdev Zalwat, clo. zalwar Ho3pital,'Aged aboot 70 years, occ: Doctor, Sarafa Markeit, Sillod, Aurangabad, Maharashtra'

3. Smt. Kunti Radha,Krishna ZalwatWo. Dr- Radha Krishna Zalwar' ag"a about 65 y.gal.soOcc: Nurse, Clo' Zalwar Hospital' Sarafa Market, Silloti, Auryngabad, Maharashtra' i Represented ttiroPgl.r its PP, t High Court of Telangan4 Hyderabad. : "Petitioner/Accused Nos' 1-3 "'ResPondentNo'1 Smt. NeemaNitesh ZalwarWloNitesh Radha Krishna Zalwar, Aged about 42 Yeats, Occ: Housewife, nro Rat No.9, Padma Apartmelt, Shivaji Nagar, RP. Road, S-ecunderabad . . .Respondent No.2/De-facto Complainant rrenr Nn )t.)e_fa< JOINT MEMO May it please Your LordshiP, l. That, the 2nd Respondent/De-facto complainant and the petitioners/Accused the Joint Memo out of their Nos. t -3 are herebY affixing their () { \ A freewill and volition and without any misinformation of whatsoever in nature. coercion 4nd undue influence or 2' For the reasons stated in the accompanying Affidavit and also the Joint Memo entered into between the Parties, it is therefore most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner and the 2d Respondent t. compound the offences; and be pleased to quash the proceedings in cc No. 3560 of 202r on the fire of the Xv ACMM at Manoranjan Complex, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon Court deems fit and proper in the crrcumstances of the case. A (,. o 2 A \ A ED No. DE-FA ,.\ CTO CO TNANT COLI'NSEL 2ND RESPONDENT COTJNSEL / NER i I ii Place: Hyderabad ""7 0-202s