The High Court · 2025

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of fVrandamus in decraring the acti6n of the respondents arrthorities no.1 to 4 in trying to mutate the names of the respondents no 5 & 6 in ftirarani portar/Revenue records and to issue pattedhar passbooks, without giving any notice to the petitioners and without giving any opportunity of hearing and without recording the contention of the petitioners who are the interested Parties/origina I owners of the agricultural land to an extr: rt of Ac.4-00 gts in Sy.No.72118/1 and Ac.4-00 gts in Sy.No.72118 (fotal Ac.3 00. gts). situated at E attisawargaon Village, lvlavala Mandal, Adilabad District : I per the direction of this Hon'ble High Court passed in WP.No.31593 ol 2023 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional. contrary to law,. violative of principles o' natural justice and contrary to the Provisions of Telangana Rights in Land and. t attadar Pass Books. Ac:t, 2020, consequently set aside the same and dire ;t the respondents authoritres no.1 to 4 to issue notice to the petitioners and to 1 rve an opportunity of hearing and record the contention of the petitioners as p€ r the direction of this Fion'ble Court passed in WP.No.31593 of 2023 to mutat the names of the respondents no. 5 & 6 in Dharani portal/Revenue records z r d to issue pattedhar p:rssbooks, in respect of the agricultural land to an exh) rt of Ac.4.00 gts rn Sy.No 72118/1 and Ac.4-00 gts in Sy.No.72t18 (foia,l Ac {-00 gts) situated at E,arttisawargaon Village, Mavala Mandal, Adilabad District. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cour rnsy be pleased to d;rect the respondents authorities no.1 to 4 to not to mut: e the names of the respondent nos. 5 & 6 in Dharani Portal in respect of the l yricultural land to an extent of Ac.4-00 gts in Sy.No.72l1811 and Ac.4-00 gts r Sy.No.72l1B (Total Ac B-00 gts) siluated at Battisawargaon Village, {\/avala Ma- lgl, Adilabad District till the notice issued to the petitioners and to give an opportlr rity of hearing and to rr:cord the contention of the petitioners as per the direction of this Hon'ble High Court passed in WP No 31593 of 2023 pending drsposa of the above writ pr:tition. C;ounsel for the Petitioners: SRI B. ARJUN Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: AGp FOR REVENT E Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 &G: SUMITH RAJ I he Court made the following: ORDER HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAI) THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.35OS9 of 2o23 DATE OF ORDER: 24.L2.2O25 BETWEEN: Bathula Ushanna and 1 another AND The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department ald 5 others. : ORDER: .. Petitioners ... Respondents This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of tndia seeking the following relief/s:- "...to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus in declaring the action of the respondents authorities Nos.l to 4 in trying to mutate the names of the respondents Nos.5 arld 6 in Dharali portal/Revenue records and to issue pattedhar passbooks, without giving any notice to the petitiorlers and without giving any opportunity of hearing and without recording the contention of the petitioners who are tlle interested Parties/ original owners of the agricultural land to an extent of Ac.4-O0 gts in Sy.No.72 l18ll atd Ac.4-00 gts in Sy.No.72/ 18 (Total Ac.8-OO. gts), situated at Battisawargaon Village, Mavala Mandal, Adilabad District as per the direction of this Honble High Court pasSed in WP.No.31593 of 2023 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrar5r to law, violative of pnnciples of natural justice and contrary to the Provisions of Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books. Act, 2020, consequently set-aside the same and direct the respondents authorities Nos.1 to 4 to issue notice to the petitioners and to give art opportunity of hearing and record ih. co.tt".rtio., of the petitioners as Per the direction of tJlis I 2 Honble Court passed in Wp.No.31593 of 2023 to tutate the names. of Lhe respondents Nos.S and 6 ir Dharani portal/Revenue records and to issue pattedhar pz s ;books, in respect of.the agricultural land to an ixtent of Ac. .0O gts in Sy.No.72/18/I and Ac.4-OO gts in Sy.No.72l 18 (To aI Ac.8_00 gts) situated at Battisawarg"o, Village, Mava| Manda_t, Adilabad District.." ' \

2. When the matter is taken up for consid(:r ation, learned counsel for unofficial respondent Nos.S ald 6 wo - d submit that mutation application filed by the unofficial respor( ent Nos.5 and 6 in respect of the larrd in question has been r jected by the oflrcial respondents uid,e proceedings No.3/1 a /2024, dated 20.06.2024. ChaJlenging the same, the unofficiz I respondents filed a writ petition vide W.p.No .613g of 2Or,., against the petitioners and others and the same is pendin? adjudication. Hence, the cause in this writ petition does not s.-trl ive for further adjudication; hence, he would seek to close this rv: t petition.

3. Concedes to the submission made by learrt d counsel for unofficial respondents, learned counsel for the pel tioners would submit that the cause in this writ petition does r ti suryive for further adjudication; hence, he wourd also seek to ;rose this writ petition.

4. Learned Assistant Governrnent pleader for F evenue takes no objection. 3

5. Having regard to the submissions made by either counsels, this Court without making any observations on the merits or demerits of the case deems it appropriate to dismiss this writ petition as infructuous since cause in this writ petition does not survive for further adjudication

6. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/-P. PONNA KRISHN ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 One CC to SRI B. ARJUN, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI SUMITH RAJ, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT] , Two CD Copies 4 P\.{K ES HIGH COURT DATED:2411212025 \ I ORDER WP.No.35059 of 2023 T4cE HT ,\ 0 3 I a ) 026 * ( L ot) t I t DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS !NFRUGTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 3/,lt-,