The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the Proceedings in C.C.No. 06 of 2O2S on the file of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nakpally, Hyderabad against the petitioner/Accused. NO: 2 BETWEEN S.Bushi Reddy, S/o S.Agi Reddy Aged about 65 years, occ-Chairman of Hindu Graveyard, Jangammet, Falaknuma Hyde rabad, Rl/o H.No. 18-2-360, Jangammet, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad .. Petitioner/ Respondent / Defecto Complainant in l.A.Nos. 2 and 3 ot 2O25 And '1 . Mohammed Arfath Ameer Khan @ Adam Khan, S/o Mohammed Ameer Uddin Khan aged 30 years Occ- Private job R/o H.No. 18-2-361N19, G.M.Chowni Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad .. Respondent/ Petitioner/ Accused in LA.Nos. 2 and 3 of 2025

2. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad .. Respondent in both l.A.Nos. 2 and 3 of 2025 Petition under Section 359 (6) R/W. 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/ 2nd respondenu Defacto complainant to compound the offence Registered against the Respondents/ Petitioner Accused registered against him Under Sections 447 , 427 , 2954, 153-A lPC in CC No. 6 of 2025 on the file of Chief Mekopolitan Magrstrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad and quash the proceedings against the RespondenVpetitioner/accused herein in Crl.P.No. ol 2025. Petition under Section 359 (2) RA / 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise in Crl.P.No. ol 2025 and quash the proceedings in CC No. 6 of 2025 on the file of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad registered against the respondenvpetitioner/ accused Under Section 447 , 427 ,295A, 153-A IPC . This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri MOHD GULAM RASOOL ,Advocate for the Petitioner in Crl.Petition and Respondent No.1 in l.A.Nos. 2 and 3 ol 2025 and the Addl. Public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 in Crl.Petition and Respondent No.2 in l.A.Nos. 2 and 3 of 2O2S and M/s. G. PADMA, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 in Crl.petition and Petitioner in l.A.Nos. 2 and 3 of 2025. The Court made the following COMMON ORDER: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA in/and This criminal petition is filed by the petitioner/accused under SectionSzSofBNSS,2o2Sseekingtoquashtheproceedings againsttheminCC.No.6of2o2SonthefileofChiefMetropolitan MagistrateatNampally,Hyderabad'registeredforthealleged offencepunishableunderSections44T'427'295-A'153-AoflPC'

2.ltissubmittedbylearnedcounselforthepetitioneraswellas respondent No.2 that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition,thepartieshavecompromisedthematterandaccordingly, l.A.Nos.2&3of2oz|havebeenfiledbyrespondentNo.2torecord comPromise between them'

3.ThelearnedAdditionalPublicProsecutorhasopposedthe compromise Petition'

4.Sincethepartieswerewillingtoenterintocompromise,they weregivenachancetosettlethematterbyappearingalongwith theirrespectivecounselbeforetheHighCourtLegalservices CommitteefortheStateofTelanganavideordersdated3::0.10.2025 \ i \ \ 2 t L'TD. J L^Nos2 & 3 ol 2025 inland Ctlp.No.l4q)O ol 2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submifted a report dated 03.11.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion, entered into compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in CC.No.6 of 2025 on the file of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, registered against the petitioner/accused are hereby quashed subject to the petitioner/accused is paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings tuc.No.52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (2OO7O), IFSC Code:SBlN0O20O7O, MICR No.500004057), within a t 3 E-TD, J l.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2O25 iiland Crtp.No.l4OO6 of 2025 period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry.

7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand crosed SD/-C.DEEPIKA ASSISTANT //TRUE COPYII To, OFFICER r Hyderabad(ouT) 1' The chief Metroporitan Magistrate at Nampaily, Hyderabad. 2- The station House otficer , chandrayanagutta porice station, Hyderabad. 3. Two ccs to public prosecutor, High court for the state of relangana at --'-- r'lrv 4. One CC to SRl. MOHD GULAM RASOOL Advocate tOpUCl 5. One CC to M/s. G. PADMA, Advocate tOpUCI 6. Two CD Copies ID ( along with a copy ofjoint memo of compromise ) Lr._r.010^00/- Note: Total Amount:f ( Rupees Ten Thousand onry ) has been paid by Sri MoHAMMED GHULAM RASooL, counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon,ble coun order dated zl-ll-2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five Thousand only ) to the Secretary, High court Legal Services committee, Higir courr for the State of t.iunguna Hyderabad and Rs' 5,000/- ( Rupees Five Thousana o-nrvl t"ih. I-rir..ror, Sainik welfare, Hyderabad and filed cost Memo No. 1402r9 of 2025 dated 04-12- 2025 . HIGH COURT DATED:21 11112025 COMMON ORDER t.A. NOS.2 AND 3 0F 2025 IN/AND CRL.PETITION No.14006 of 2025 lltE 5l-.q; (-. Y /), 16 DiC * nftar^', '-,,.iE -!; ALLOWTNG THE I.A. NOS. 2 AND 3 OF 2025 A]\[D CRL.PETITION. 1 G \v I -t [lti $il ;l It: 'll I L I ,. l. t: t' i i I i ) IN TTTN' HIGII COTIRT EOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT IIYDERABAI) Crl.P.No. of 2025 Between: S.Bushi ReddY S/o S.Agi ReddY Ag"O about 6! years, occ, ![rairman Giaveyard, Jangammet, Falaknuma Hyderabad, R/o H-No. 18-2-360, ilGffiAildl4sd. Hvderabad' "Petitionerfr?"Tiilfl"" of Hindu 1 2 Mohammed Arfath Ameer Khan @ AdamKhan i7o Uotrummed Ameer Uddin Ktran aged 30 years Occ; Private joh.$/o H.No' l8-2-36lNl8' ;.il.a;;;;ilffi o'.vGr""Hvderabad'p"riti;""1;X"Hty The State of Tetangana reP. bY its ,rirrlir"r".criatlfitfi court at Hvderabad' " 'Respondent . JOtr{T MEMO It is submitted that on the irrtervention of the well wishers friends and relatives and caste elders the diqputes between them were amicably tt not to Prosecute sorted out. The elders advise the petitioner/ responder the criminal case registered against the Respondent/ petitioner/ Accused and for bettennent of the Accusecl and R2 as the petitioner /accused and thewellwisherssettlethedisputesamicable,betweenthe respondent/Accused and they are for the betterment of their cordial relationship.Thepetitionerhavenointeresttopros.ecutetheabove criminal casie against the' petitioner/respondent/Accused' The said { ,. \ criminal proceedings may bc"quashed in the interest ofjustic€ in CC No. 6 of 2025 on the file of chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad and cannot be claim anything against the petitioner and future .The defacto complainant/ accordingly/ the petitioner/R2 is agreed not to prosecute the criminal case registered against Respondent/Petitioner/Accuse Under Sections 447, 427, 2g5A, 153-,{ IPC as they are seffled amicably as the both side community elders aie settled the matfer with both of them. ..'' It is submiued that the petif,o nerl2n respondent have amicably settled the dispute at,the iirtervention of elders and well wishers and friends and caste elders the matter has been compromised between them. Hence the both parties came to conrpromise in the above Crl.p.No. of 2025 against cc No. 6 of 2025 on the file of chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad registered against the respondent /Accused under sections u7, 427, 2gsL,l53-A Ipc and both the parties have no claims or rights against each other iri future and the are lived their individual life and no authority to . accused and . 't- each o them. Counsel t0V% Petitioner/ Respondent No. 2 Defacto complainant Petitioner/ Respondent No. 2 = Defacto complainant