United lndia lnsurance Co. Ltd v. MD.Azeed
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The said representation is recorded and the appeal is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. ln view of the same, the present appeat is disposed of in terms of the Award, dated 13.09.2025, passed by the Lok Adalat. There sha[[ be no order as to costs.
Judgment
Smt. Hameeda, Wo. Md. Azeed Housewife R/o. Lingapur li/andal, Dandepalli, Adilabad District.
P.Lachanna, S/o. Lingaiah Owner of Auto bearing No. 4001-W-7191 R/o. H.No. 1-06 Village and mandal Dandepalli Adilabad District. ... Respondents/Claimants
MD.Jameer S/o. Late Ageed.
MD.Nazeer S/o. Late Azeed. Both R/o. Lingapur Village Dandepalli Adilabad District. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(MACMAMP. No: aZ oF 2012) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant ...RespondenURespondent of Stay of execution of the decree as well as all further proceedings passed in OP No.304 of 2010 dated 294-2011 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Decree MACT-Cum-lll Additional District Judge FTC) at Asifabad, Adilabad District pending disposal of the above appeal in the interest of .lustice. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI CH.VENKATA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3, 4, 5: SRI S.CHANDRASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: --- The Court made the following: JUDGEMENT -.rr-, :J I i I \ To, % HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA M.A.C.M.A. No.842 of 2013 IUDCEMENT: The present appeal was referred to Lok Adatat. On 13.09.2025, authorized representative of appettant / lnsurance Company has appeared before Lok Adatat and stated that the lnsurance Company has decided not to pursue the present appeal and seeks to withdraw the appeal. Recording the said submission, the Lok Adatat passed the award on
13.09.2025 and the matter was settled before the Lok Adatat.
ln view of the same, the present appeat is disposed of in terms of the Award, dated 13.09.2025, passed by the Lok Adalat. There sha[[ be no order as to costs.
3. Registry is directed to annex the Lok Adatat award copy along with this order. Misceltaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal sha[[ stand ctosed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. M. JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-lll Additional District & Sessions Judge, (FTC), Asifabad, Adilabad.
2. One CC to SRI CH.VENKATA NARAYANA, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI S.CHANDRASEKHAR, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies (Enclosed a copy of Award Passed by Lok Adalat) HIGH COURT DATED:2310912025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.842 of 2013 .\HE S14 [ 5 ilB 202 t //.>.i o() * I MACMA DISPOSED OF IN TERMS OF AWARD PASSED BY LOK ADALAT ,ls V} I I I \ BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE (HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD) IUnder Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Centrat Act)] Date:13-09-2025 Present: 1 . Hon'ble Justice Sri G.V. Seethapathy, (Former Judge of erstwhile Andhra Praderh HiSh Court) Chairman
2. Sri K. Vasantha Rao, Advocate, Member .ii M.A.C.M.A. No .842 of 2013 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST O.P.No.304 of 2010 (0n the fite of the (M.A.C.T.) lll Addt. District Judge (FTC) Asifabad) Between: United lndia lnsurance Co. Ltd., rep. by its Manager, Dr.No.28-03-66/2, Opp. Railway Bridge, Caltex Area, Bettampatti, Aditabad District. ...Appettant/ Responden t No.2 AND 1 Md. Azeed, 5/o. Abdut Rehman, (Died per LRs 4 & 5) Aged about 55 years, Occ: Nit, R/o. Lingapur Mdt. Dandepalti, Dist. Aditabad. 2. Smt. Hameeda W/o Md.Azeed, Aged 50 years, Occ: House wife, R/o. Lingapur, Mdt. Dandepatti Dist. AdiLabad.
3. P.Lachanna, S/o. Lingaiah, Occ: Owner of Auto Bearing No.A001-W-7191, R/o.H.No.1-06 Vittage And MandaI Dandepat[i, Dist. Aditabad. ...Respondents/Ctaimants (RR 4 e 5 brought on record as LRs of Rl as per the court order, dt.25-03-201 3) \. M.D.Jameer, S/o. Late Azeed, !, M.D.Nazeer, S/o. Late Azeed, Both Rio. Lingapur Vittage, Dandepalty Mandat, Aditabad District .Respondents/ Respondents AWARD 1 This is an appeal fited by the Appettant / lnsu rance Company chattenging the order dated 79-04-7011 passed in MVOP.No.304 of 2010 by the (M.A.C.T.) lll Addt. District Judge (FTC)Asifabad. tKB I t:
2. Ms.Geeta Rai, Regional Manager the authorized representative of Appel [ant/ ln su rance Company, has appeared and represented that the lnsurance Company decided not to pursue the present appeal and therefore they are withdrawing the appeat.
Operative part
3. The said representation is recorded and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, confirming the judgment and decree of the Court/Tribunal betow. The amount, if any, remaining unpaid to the ctaimant(s) shatt be deposited by the lnsurance Company within one month from the date of receipt of the award, along with interest.
4. On such deposit, the Responden t/ Ctaiman t (s ) islare permitted to withdraw his/her/their respective amount/s as per the award passed by the Tribunat/lvlACT.
5. In case, the parties subsequent[y come to know about fiting of cross appea[/cross objection, they are given [iberty to seek recatI of this Order/Award.
Court fee paid on this appeal shatt be refunded. 7. No costs. I I For Unrted urancEco' Ltd'' Aullolis ' d Siqnrloty Itant/Respon dent No.2 surance Com a ) CHAIRMAN ER -i S:* .l'
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The said representation is recorded and the appeal is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 — s. 19.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.