The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of l\4andarnus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not passing any orders ...RESPONDENTS either on the interlocutory application or on the revision petition filed by the petitioners agarnst the ejectment orders passed by the 3' Respondent in Case No. fWB2l50l2O16, ,iated 07.10.20'16 and the confirmation order passed by the 2nd respondent in LTR Appeal No. A4/LTR/41 12017. dated.05 08.2025 in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.7.25 gts in Sy.No. 8 and the Rice N,4ill, situated at Tiryani Village and Mandal, Komurumbheem Asifabad District, as illegal, arbitrary, abuse of process of law and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent no. 1 to pass appropriate orders on the interlocutory application or in the revision petition within a reasonable period with a further direction to the r,:spondents 2 to 4 not to dispossess the petitioners from their respective lands total admeasuring Ac.7.25 gts in Sy.No.08 and rice mill. situated at Tiryani Village and lt4andal, Komurambheem Asifabad Dlstrict, in the interest of justice and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 lo 4 not to dispossess the petitioners from their respective lands total admeasuring Ac.7 .25 gts in Sy.No.0B and rice mill, situated at Tiryani Village and I\,4andal, Komurambheem Asifabad District till the disposal of the statutory revision pending before the 1st respondent. pending disposal of the above writ petitron in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI S SURENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No's 1 TO 4 : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: ORDER 1, THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA wRIT PETITION No.326OE of 2025 ORDER:

1. This Writ Petition is filed questioning the inaction of respondent No.l in not passing any orders either on the interlocutory application or on the revision petition filed by the petitioners against the ejectment orders passed by respondent No.3 in Case No. TWB2/50120 16, dated 07.10.2016, and the confirmation order passed by the 2nd respondent in LTR Appeal No. AalLTR/41 /2017, dated 05.08.2025, in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.7.25 gts 1n Survey No.B and the rice mill situated at Tiryani Village and Mandal, Komurumbheem Asilabad District.

2. Heard Sri S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed a revision petition before respondent No.1 challenging the ejectment orders passed by respondent No.3 in Case No.TWB2/50 12016, dated 07.10.2016, and the ) NtsK J wP 32608 2025 a confirmation order passed by the !"a respondent in LTR Appeal No. A4/LTR/ 4l l20 17, dated 05.08.2025, in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.7 .25 gts in Survey No.B ald the rice mill situated at Tiryani Viilage and Mandal, Komurumbheem Asifabad. It is further stated that the petitioners have been in possession of the property for decades, and if they are evicted, they will suffer irreparable loss. It is stated that respondent No.4 and his subordinates visited the property on 25. lO.2O25 and attempted eviction, and they may return to dispossess the petitioners. Therefore, learned counsel prays that respondent No. 1 be directed to dispose of the appeal expeditiously.

4. Learnerl Government Pleader for Social \.\rt:[fare submits that the responclent authorities may be directed to consider and dispose of the: same in accordance u,ith lar.v.

5. Upon pr:rusa1 of the record ald submissions of both the learned counsel, it is evident that the petitioners have been in possession of the land and rice mill for several rlecades. It is noted that respondent No.4 and his subordinates have attempted eviction, and there is a real hkelihood of dispossession. It may be further noted that the inaction 3 NBK J wP 3260E 202i respondent No. I in disposing of the revision petition would rcsult in irreparable ioss to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.1 to consider and pass appropriate orders on the revision petition filed by the petitioners, strictly in accordalce u.ith lau , n,ithin a period of four (04) weeks lrom the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the meantim e, status-quo existing as on today shall be maintained by both the parties u,ith regard to tl're subject propert-y. No costs. Miscelianeous applications, if any pending, shall stald closed. i t ! //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER ./e To, HYderabad'

1. The Principal Secretary' Tribal Department' Secretariat' State of Telangana' 2 The Addl. Agent to the Government and Project Officer' ITDA' Utnoor' -' Adilabad District 3. The Special Deputy Collector (T W')' Utnoor' Adilabad District' 4. The Tahsildar' Tiryani lr'4andal Komuram Bheem Asifabad District' 5. One CC to SRI S SURENDER REDDY Advocate iOPUCI 6 Two CCs to GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 'High Court for the State of Telangana [OUTI 7 Two CD CoPies ASV 'n'&t I / /:,"" I ..i) t ltrE S14 1 0[r NA .aParCrrt-, (s( o a HIGH COURT DATE D:29/10/2,12s ORDER WP.No.32608 of 2025 WRII'PETITION IS DTSPOSED OF WITHOUT COS'I' i. I