Smt. Chapali Anandamma v. 1. The State of Telangana

5. Sri. Sandemolla Hanmanthu, S/o. Sandemolla Narayana, Aged about: 60 years, Occupation. agriculture, tVo. Malreddypalli Village, Damargidda lrilandal, Narayanpet District-509 407. .,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of It/ANDAlvlUS, Directing the Respondent No.2 and 3 to forthwith rejecUcancel the Bhu Bharathi Application No.32050100006 dated 0610612025, filed by Respondent No.5 for extent correction, which has adversely affected the petitioner's property bearing Survey No.62, admeasuring Ac.2.05 gts, situated at lvlalreddypally Village, Damargidda Mandal, Narayanpet Dr ;tfict and consequently declare that the failure of the respondents to verify and consrder the objection copies and supporting documents submitted by lhe petitiorrer, is arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutiona l, and violatrve of Articles 14, 21, and 3O0l rlf the Constitution of lndia, to dispose of the write petiticn. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that rn the cirr:umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court m.ry be pieased to Direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to forthwith stay all further pr( c3edings and ongoing lvlutation/transactions in respect of land bearing Sy. No.62 admeasuring Ac 2 05 gts, situated at Malreddypally Village, Damargidda Manda, Narayanpet District, in relation to Bhu Bharathi Applicatiorr No.32050100006 datt d 06.06.2025 filed by Respondent No.5 for extent correction which has arversely affected the petitioner's property, pending final disposal of lhe present v/rit petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KADIYALA SRINIVAS REDD'y Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: SRI L. RAVINDER. AGP FOR RE'/ENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: " The Court made the following: ORDER E. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.32497 of 2025 9RDEB This Wnt Petrtion is iilecl praf ing this Court to direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 to forthrvith reject/cancel the Bhu Bharati Application bearing No.32O5O 100006, dated 06.06.2025 made by respondent No.5 seeking lor correction of extent, which has adversell' aflected the pctitioner's property i.e., land admeasuring Acs.2.O5 gunt.rs in Sy.No.62, situated al Malreddypally Villagc, D:rmarigadda Mandal, Narayanpet District and t:onsecluentl-t', to declare that the failure of the vcriff ing and considering the objections respondenls submi tted br. petltlonL'r, as arbitrary, itlegal, uncon stitu tio nal and violative ol Articles 14, 2l and 300-A of the Constitution o[ India and [or other appropriate reliefs.

2. Heard Sri K.srinivas Reddl', Iearned counsel for the petitioner ancl Sri L-Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revcnuc appcaring lor the respondents and with their consent, this rvrit petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stagc, L. ) t\\.J \\ 1 i119- i t)15 - Lcarncd coltnsel for the petitioner \\'ould s 'Ll)rni: th'rl the j:Lllttlral lilnd

3. pctitroncr is tlic rluncr and possessor of thc admcasLlrirrg Acs.2.05 guntas in Sv No'6'l' sittl:llt.rl t1t Malrecldl'palN Village, Damarigadda Nianclir' Naravaupet District, having acquired the same lrom his fl'r l:er' Le:rrned counsel for thr: pctitioner $,ould further submit tl at 1ll.- n:rti-rt- of 'lS thc pctitioncr $zrs also incorporated in all the r-( \'('IlLl( rccorcls and shc \\'as also issued e pattadar paLss book bcarirlg No.TO IO50 lOOO22, uid-e Khata No.36 uncler tJr: provisions of thr: Tclang:rna Rights in Land and Paltaclar i':lsst-l'roks Act, 2O2O. Learncd counsel for lhe petitioner $'otL cl sr'tbmrt tllill pursLrant- to tl'rt application made bv rcsptlnr:r-'rt No'5 uide Application No.32O50100006, dated 06'06 20::r scrking lor corrcction ol thc extent of land in 51 No 62, responrtcnt No 3 issr-red noticc. uide Notice No.A/9009/2025, cla t-':i 08 08 2025 and al-tcr rcr:cipt of the said notice, the petitioncr ll so subnliticd her cbjections. clated 26.O9.2025. Learned : rt:ttst l [or t]re petrtioner rvottld further submit that, upon chc:liin.s thc Bhu Bharati por[:rl on lb.lO.2025, the mutation/tril]lsactiL)11 staLtls rcllectcd thzrt "Ongoing transaclion on survc)' r t nlbcr is ntlder l-iruccss", ir:.rti' tltcrelore, the pcLitioncr once :tl,,tirl r;ltbnritLcd lrcsh objections, datcd 16-1O-2025 rcquesting rc s:on'lel'rt No 3 -- -t LVV. J \\'p 3l-I97 2025 to reject the application made by' respondent No.5. The grievance of the petitioner is that, thougl-r she hlcd the objcctions, no action is taken bv rcspondent No.5 till date ard therefore, she r,l,oulc.;eek appropriate orders to be passed.

4. lrarned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue rvould submit that, acting on thc application submitted by respondent No.5, necessary notice has been issued to the petitioncr and the petitioner also submitted hcr objections. He rvould further submit that, after due veriflcation and on cxamination of the objections submitted b]'the petitiont'r, appropriatc orders would be passed by the respondcnt authoriLies in acccrdance r,vith lau,.

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Rcvenue and since the petitioner has already submitted her ob.;ections to the impugned notice issued by respondent No.3 pursuant to the application made by respondent No.5, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this u'rit petition directing respondent No.3 to take the petitioner's objections into consideration while deciding the application hled by respondent No.S and after issuing notices to all the interested persons including respondent No.5, shall pass appropriate orders in accordance !- 4 I \.\'. J \\ I Il l,rI loli $ ith Ia$,. Since the noticc is s[aled [o bc ordcrr', ] [o r,]sporlclcrlt No.5, issuzrncc ol' notice lo rcspondent No.5 irr rlri ; u t tl pt titiorl shall stand clispcnsed rvith

6. Witl-r the above observations, this Writ Pctr ion is clisposcd of. There shall bc no order as to costs As a sequcl, thc miscellaneous petitions 1,t'rrrlirtg, if' etrtr'. shall stand ckr sccl Srll.P.PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \__ ,l //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To The PrinciPal SecretarY, Revenue ieiretariat builo'h0; dYUerabad' Depart 'ent Sitate of Telangana'

2. The District Collecbr, Narayanpet' Narayanpet Districl' felanqana State' District 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer' Narayanpet Division' "lirrayanpet 4 The Tahsildar and Joint Sub-Register' Damarg Cda I\,4andal, NarayanPet District-509 407 5 One CC to SRI KADIYALA SRINIVAS REDDY' Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue' High Court for the Sltate of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. Two CD CoPtes MP P i\,1K HIGH COURT DATED:1911112025 /,/,', 1r ) li '-) \i - ) <il: It 2I 'lir\l zllE i 1, 1 l) jit:.i.rr- r ,il.l l ;.,-. . .'- ,-;,:-- ORDER WP.No.32497 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS t\\