The High Court · 2025

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, rnore particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the Respondents in conducting Survey, demarcation and Sub-Division of Petitioners agricultural lands admeasuring Acs.O.2O Gts in Sy.No.l32lDl6"and Acs.1.20 Gts in Sy.No.132lD4, pursuant to F-Line Application Nos.TTDERO225O12O3425 and TTDER0225O12O3418 both dated 07.O9.2O25 respectively situated at Seetarampally Village, Banswada Division, Bichkunda Mandal, Kamareddy District, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, circulars issued by the respondents, judgment of this Hon'ble Court in W.A.No.110 of 2013 and also violative of A(icles 14, 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondent authorities to forthwith conduct survey, demarcation and sub-division of the Petitioners aforesaid agricultural, lands pursuant to the F-Line Application Nos.TTDER022501 203425 and TTDER0225O12O3418 both dated O7.O9.2O25 made by the petitioners lA NO: J OF 2025 : Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to direct the Respondent Authorities to conduct survey, demarcation and sub- division of the Petitioners agricultural lands admeasuring Acs.O.20 Gts in Sy.No.l32/D/6 and Acs.'|.20 Gts in Sy.No.132lD4, pursuant to F-Line Application Nos.TTDEflO22s0 1 203425 and TTDERO2 2501 20341 B both dated' 07.09.2025 respectivel'y, situated at Seetarampally Village, Banswada Division, Bichku'nda Mandal, Karmareddy District Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI M V DURGA PRASAD Counsel fo,r the Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL PRDER This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief: "...pleased to issue a utit order or direction fitore partiatlarlg one. in the nature of urit of Mandamus dedarbq the in action of the Respondents in a nducting Suruey demarwtion and Sub-Diui.sion of Petitioners agrianltural lands admeasuing Acs.O.2O Gfs in Sy.iVo. 132/D/6 and Acs.l:2o Gts in Sy./Vo. 132/D4 pursuant to F-Line Application N o s. TTD ER 02 2 5 O 1 2 O 3 42 5 a.nd TTDERO221O1203418 bottt dated 07.09.2025 respectiuelg situated at Seetarampallg Village, Bansua.da Diui.sion Bichlunda Mand.al, Kamareddg Di"strict as illegal, arbitrary, untrary to law ciranlars issued by the respondents judgment of this Honble Court in W.A.No.ILO of 2013 and aLso uiolatiue of Artides 14, 3OOA of the Constihttion of Indio and further direct the resportdent autlarities to for'thwith conduct surueA demarqtion antd s-ubdiuision of the Petitioners aforesaid agrianltural lands pursuant to tle F-Line Applimtion IYos.II'DERO225O1203425 ard. TTDERO221O1203418 both d..ated O7.O9.2O25 made by the petitioners and pass...' 2- Heard Sri M.V.Durga Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for the resFgtgents and perused the record ;::JJlil'{- iti!.#c. Page 2 ofS n n 3- Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would , sutrmit . tl:at petitioner No.l is the -absolute owner and posisessor of agricultural land to an extent of Ac.o.2o guntas (out of Acs. 1.o6 guntas) in sy.No. L32lD / s, situated at seetarampally Village, Banswada Division, Bichkunda Ma;edal, Kamareddy District, having purchased the same through a registered. sale deed bearing document No.963 of 2Cl09, dated 15.o5.2oo9. petitioner No.2 is the absolute owrrer and possessor of agricultural land to an extent of Acs' 1.2o guntas (out of Acs.2.26 gpntas) in sy.No. L32/D/3, situated at the very sarne vilrage, through a registered sale deed bearing document No.94 of 2aor, dated 23.oL.2ooz. The names of the petitioners also recorded in the revenue reccrds and pattedar passbooks and. title deeds were also issued uide passbook Nos.Tl2o 4o2zoo2s and Tl2t)4o27o16& Later on, the nlmes of the petitioners were also entered in Dharani web portal with Khata Nos.So and 283. 4- The special commissioner and Director stlrvey, Settlernent and Land Records isstred instructions uid.e r. (^' Page 3 ofS Circula,rs R.C.No.N L /65/.g /gg, dated 2S.OT.2OOL, Rc.No.Nl / L4aB/oT, B.o;.iooz, Rc.No.N2 | L74l/2OLO, dated f 8.OS.2O10 and D.o. Rc. N o.N t / 4296 / 20 L2, dated 22.og.2o L2 to the Revenue Survey Authorities for survey and demarcation of the lands on request made by private parties such as petitioners. Based on the said circulars this court uide its order dated 14.46.2013 was preased to ailow w.A.No.l 1o of 2oL3 directing to conduct snrvey and d.emarcation. In fact, respond.ent No.l admitted in the said writ Appeal that there is no prohibition for conducting the sLr.ryey under the law. The Telangana Survey and Boundaries Act, Lg2s provide for survey, demarcation and sub-division and also mainteRance of survey records and also re-survey in case the survey marks are damage-d by ttre land owners. .:5- The rdspondent-authorities have to necessarily pin""r" the petitioners' F-Line application Nos.TrDERo22 sotzo342s and TTDERo22sor2o34r8; both dared oT.og.2ozs for survey, demarcation and sub-division in terms of the aforesaid circulars and the judgment of this co,rt in Page 4 of5 ., W.lr.No.11O of 2013. Despite receiving and acknowledging tlre said F-line applications, the respond.ent-authorities did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction, the peb,tioners filed the present writ petition.

6. Whereas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Relenue, on instructions, #puld submit that the respondent- authorities will consider the aforesaid F-line applications sutrmitted by the petitioners by following the due procedure laid. down und.er law and conduct survey and demarcate the afor:esaid land by fixing boundaries.

7. In view of the aforesaid discussion, this writ petition is disposed. of, directing the respondent-authorities to consider the F-line applications bearing Nos.TTDERO22SO L2O3425 ancl TTD.ERo225OL2O34L8, both dated 07 'O9'2025 sutrmitted by the petitioners, conduct survey and d.emarcate the aforesaid lands by"i fi*i,,g bound'aries, strictly in accord€rnce with law by putting the petitioners and all .+. alk:cted parties on notice and affording them an opportunity- If :respondent-authorities are not inclineC to accept the request mad.e by the petitioners, they shalt pass an order Page 5 of5 assigning specific reasons and communicate cgpy of .the said order to the petitioners. They shalt cornplete the entire exercise within a period of forty five (45) working days from the date of receipt of a copy of this ord.er. There shall be nol .:.-.. order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if arry, pending, shall stand dismissed. SD/- M.JAWAHAR ASSISTANT //TRUE CO SECTION OFFICER i To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Telangana, Hyderabad The State of

6. PVL TKS The Tahsildar, Bichkunda Mandal, Kamareddy District- TheMandalSurveyor,BichkundaMandal;Kamar{dyDis(ri9t.. One CC to SRI M V DURGA PRASAD, Advocate [OPUCI ' Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for: the State of Telangana. touTl Two CD Copies ]', TIIGH COURT DATED.,27l1Ol2O2S THE S t r6 t.g 2l,26 * r') : * ORDERI WP.No.32408 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOI.'T COSTS -g JK< 6H>6