High Court · 2025

Judgment

1. 2 J 4 Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Chairman The Director General of Police, Telangana State, Hyderabad. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Hyderabad. The Principal, Police Training College, Karimnagar. ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to rssue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ (a) declaring the lVlemorandum RC. No. 49/Rectt/Gen.212024, dated 26-10-2024 and Order C. No. A 1lPfCl57612023-24, D.O. No. 18112024, dated 02.11.2024 issued by the Respondent Nos. 1 and 4 respectively, cancelling the selection of the petitioner to the post of Stipendiary Cadet Trainee (Civil) Police Constable and discharging him from training, as arbitrary, illegal, violative of the principles of natural justice and Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently set aside the said order, (b) to direct the respondents to restore the selection of the petitioner to the post of SCT Police Constable (Civil), Hyderabad City Police Commissionerate, and permit him to continue and complete his induction training and further process of appointment in accordance with law,with all consequential benefits including continuity of service, pay, allowances, s,:niority and other attendant benefits fnr the period lost due to the illegal cancellation. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirr;umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 1 and 4 to permit the petitioner to continue his training provisionally at the Police Training College, Kar mnagar, by duly suspending the Memorandum Rc. No. 49/Rectt/Gen1.212024, dated 26-10-2O24 and Order C. No. Al/PTCl576l2O23-24, D.O. No. 18112024, dated 02.11.2024 issued by the Respondent Nos. 1 and 4 respectively. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the Appeal submitted by the Petitioner dated 5-11-2024 by duly considering the Bonafide certificates and report of the District Educational Officer, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. PRIYANKA SINGH, REP. FOR SRI SAI PRASEN GUNDAVARAM Counsel for the Respondent No.'t: SRI C.RAJA SEKHAR REDDY, SC FOR TSLPRB Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: GP FOR SERVICES (HOME) The Court made the following: ORDER ( ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK W.P.No.324OL of 2025 With the consent of the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up lor disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. Heard Ms.Priyalka Singh, representing Sri Sai Prasen Gundavaram, learned counsel lor the petitioner, Sri C.Rajashekar Reddy, learned Star-rding Counsel appearing for respondent No. I and the learned Government Pleader for Services (Home) appearing lor the respondent Nos.2 to 4 and perused the record. al. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the notihcation issued by the respondent No.1 vide Notification Rc. No.4 1 / Re ct. / Admn. I I 202 2 dated 25.4.2022, petitioner applied and participated in the selection process for the post of Stipendiary Cadet Trainee (SCT) Police Constable (Civil) and thereafter selection order was issued vide proceedings No.HCP/ R&T / RT -2 / 22 I 2024 dated 23.2.2024 and in pursuance of the same, petitioner was inducted into training program for a period of nine months. Thereafter, petitioner was issued u.ith a 2 \ show cause notice dated 3.5.2024, stating that the Commissioner of Police, H_vderabad submitted a report vicle letter dated

12.3.2024 inf<rrming that the Stud-v/Bonafide Certihcate of 1.t to 4th class submitted by the petitioner \\'ere found to be not genuine Petitioner subrnitted his explaration to the said show cause notice on 21.5.2024. However, without considering the said explanation, the respondents issued the impugned Memorandum dated

26.1O.2024, cancelling the selection ordcr of the lretitior-rer on the ground that the petitioner has not submitted his' explanation to the show cause notice. Thereafter, vidc proceedings dated

2.17.2024, p<-'titioner's selection rvas ca.ncellec and he was discharged from the training. Aggrieved b1, the' :;ame, petitioner preferred appeal before the respondent No.1 on 5.11.2024 Hoq,ever, no action was taken on the said appeal, therefore, petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court to direc: the respondent No.1 to consider and pass appropriate orders on the appeal submitted by the petitioner on 5.11.2024, u,ithin a stipulated period of time. by duly taking into consideratior-r lhe explanation submitted by the petitioner on 21 .5.2024 to the shou. cause notice dated 3.5.2024 issued by the respondents. ..t,', ,/ 3

4. The learned Standir-rg Counsel appearing for respondent No.1, on instructions, submits that a detailed enquiry was caused by an IPS Officer of Superintendent rank and it was reported through letter dated 9.6.2025 that Bonafide Certificate of Study from l"t to 4th class in respect of petitioner is not genuine as the year of admission and class of admission was altered in the admission and withdra'"r,al registers of the schooi. However, the 1 learned Standing Counsel submits that as the petitioner submitted appeal to the respondent No. l, the respondent No.1 will consider and pass appropriate orders on the said appeal, 1n I ! accordance with [a\.r,.

5. Having regard to the submissions made by the respective parties and without going into merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent No.1 to pass appropriate orders on the appeal submitted by the petitioner on

5.1I.2O24 by duly taking into consideration the explanation submitted by the petitioner on 21.5.2024 to the show cause notice dated 3.5.2O24 issued by the respondents, without reference to the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.49/Rectt. /Genl .2/2024 dated 4

26.tO.2024 and also proceedings C.No.A1/PTC 1576/2023-24 dated 2. 11.2024, strictly in accordarce with laiv, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (061 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if aly, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY' SDr-T.SRINIVAS REDDY ASSiISTANT REGISTRAR6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Chairman, Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board, Hyderabad. 2. The Director General of Police, Telangana State, Hyderabad. 3. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Hyderabad. 4. The Principal, Police Training College, Karimnagar. 5. One CC to SRI SAI PRASEN GUNDAVARAM, Advocate IOPUCI 6. One CC to SRI C.RAJA SEKHAR REDDY, SC FOR TSLPRB [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES (HOME), High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] \ To,

8. Two CD Copies 8SR/BSK o- i HIGH COURT DATED: 0611112025 CC TODAY <, ur TEL4 .s' .\\. \:, \ 4,rlH + ,,li *ii 8ll .R ORDER WP.No.32401 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS \\ \l \\