K. Gopal v. J. Padmavathi, Wo G. Muthu Kumar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Outcome
Dismissed
1 of 2022 and the apPeal are dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ss. 96, 151
- Limitation Act, 1963 s. 5
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LA.No.1 of 2022 ln/a nd CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO: 126 OF 2022 Appeal under section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated 1010112020 made in O.S, No. 206 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Secunderabad. Between: K. Gopal, S/o K. Yadaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No. 1-40, Madhapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. ...AppellanUDefendanUPetitioner/ in CCCA and l.A.No.1 of 2022 AND J. Padmavathi, Wo G. Muthu Kumar, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o Flat No.203, SMR Empire, Street No.9, Road No.5, West Maredpally, Secunderabad, Telangana. ...RespondenUPlaintiff in GCCA and l.A.No.1 of 2022 lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 5 of Limitation Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone delay of 178 days in filing the present appeal against Decree and Judgment Dt. 10.01.2020 passed in O.S. No. 206 o'f 2012 on the file of the I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Secunderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of Decree and Judgment Dt. 1010112020 passed in O.S. No. 206 of 2012, On the file of the lAdditional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Secunderabad including execution, pending disposal of the above appeal. 7 Counsel for the Appellant : SRI SANDEEP KUMAR BODLA Counsel for the Respondent : LINGAMPELLY RAVINDER The Court delivered the following: Common Judgment -----7 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA I.A.No.1 OF 2022 IN/AND C.C.C.A.No. 126 0F 2022 COMMON IUDGMENT: (Per t'lon'bte Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili) Learned counsel for the Petitioner/ aPPellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw I.A.No.1 of 2022 and the appeal'
Operative part
2. Permission is accorded. -). Accordingly, I.A.No.1 of 2022 and the apPeal are dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs' Miscellaneous Application s, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. r-\ SDI- JOINT K. SAI LESHI REGIS TRAR I ,ITRUE COPY/' SECTTON OF FTCER \ To,
The I Additional Chief Judge' City Civil Court' at Secunderabad(With ; tr*il]lH ffi^'-H{$arfi RBs EE*'i ^ffi":E
Two CD Coptes ADK/gh HIGH COUR'T DATED:0710:112025 COMMON JUDGMENT l.A.No.1 of 2A22 ln/and CCCA.No.126 of 2022 (( \r.: c )^ r.q i C e 3" 1I JUtt lus :\ PAT:tsC o DISMISSING THE CCCA AND l.A.No.1 of 2022 AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS Y* 6 3lr a\L)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 1 of 2022 and the apPeal are dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — ss. 96, 151; Limitation Act, 1963 — s. 5.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.