High Court · 2025

lne_ figfr Court_for the State.of .Telangall Hyderabad, rep. by its Registrar Judicial-|, High Court, Hyderabad (Fonial party) The Building, Hyderabad, Telangana State. Secretary, .Bar _Counsel fof the State of Telangana, at High Court . ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction, particularly in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, to declare the inaction of the Respondent (Registrar Judicial-l) on the complaints dated O1 .02.2025,19.06.2025, O2.O}.2O2S and ,t4.1O.2025 illegal, arbitrary, and against the principles of naturar justice and professionar ethics, and B) Direct the Respondent No.1 to take appropriate action on the said complaints as per law, including issuing notices and conducting an inquiry against sri Gurram srinivas and erring regigtry officials and to restrain sri Gurram srinivas, Advocate, from sending any individuals to the office of ch.Ganesh, Advocate, causing nuisance, intimidation, or any form of disturbance forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.BALAMUKUND [pARTy-tN-pERSONI Counsel for the Respondents: -- The Court made the following: ORDER n I TN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF 11 }LANGANA AT ITYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM 8 OSIIY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CH.f\l ,APATHI RAO WP.No.37437 of 2ol25 Dt.30.L2.20.25 Between: B.Balamukund Rao ......Petitioner The High Court for the State of Telangana and another O R D E R: per the Hon'ble Sri ..fr-.stice Slud.d,a.lq. Choloipat tt Rao)

1. Heard Sri B. Balamukund(petitioner/party -in-person) and . .....Respondents perused the record.

2. The instant n,rit petition has been hled vr th the following prayer: "...to issue an order or direction, more partianlar g in tte nafite of a Writ of Mandamus, to declaing tte inaction,,f the Respondent (Regbtror Judicial- 1 ) on the comptaints ctt ted OZ.O2.2O2 S. 19.06.2025, 02.09.2025 and 14.1O_2O25 as illt:1 al, arbitrary, and. r 2 against tle pirrciples of nafural justie and professional ethics, and; B) Direct the Respondent No.l to take appropriate action on the said amplaints as per lau, including issuing noties and conducting an inquiry agaitLst Si Gunam Siniuas and erring registry officials ond to restrain Si Gurram Sriniua.s, Aduocate, from sending ang indiuiduats to tle olfie of CLt Gonestg Aduocate, cousing nuisance. intimidatiory or ang form of di.sturbance fo,-thutith and pass such order or orders . . .".

3. Upon considering the writ prayer and the avernents made in the writ affidavit, it is evident that the petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to act upon certain complaints and to initiate action against an advocate and registry officials. Such reliefs do not fall within the scope of writ jurisdiction, as they involve disputed questions of fact and matters that are required to be examined by the competent authorities in accordance with the prescribed procedure. In the absence of violation of a legal right warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, no relief can be granted, and thus, the writ petition is not maintainable

4. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not maintarnable. However, it is left open to the writ petitioner to approach the concerned authorities. No order as to costs. .) As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pen,1 ng, if any, shall stand closed. SD/ M.OSMAN ALI BAIG AS:i GISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER =/ i\ To,

1. One CC to SRI B.BALAMUKUND [PARTY-IN-PERSOT'I 2. One CC to Ms. V.NAGA LAKSHMI, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies BSRYBSK A+-- HIGH COURT DATED: 3011212025 2 DRAFTS ORDER WP.No.37437 of 2025 ) o U H ES F \ ,f- ( Pz c)5 1 3 l,iAH 2026 * D

4.sFi;c'l DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS NOT MAINTAINABLE, WITHOUT COSTS *v' [ 348s ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FME PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO 1A NO: 1 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO: 37,87 OF 2025 Between: B. Balamukund Rao, S/o. Late Vishwanath Rao, Aged about 65 years, Fyo H.No.3-3-190, Cheppal Bazar, Hyderabad. AND '1. The High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, rep. by its Registrar Judicial-1, High Court, Hyderabad

2. The Secretary. Bar Counsel for the State of Telangana, at High Court Building, Hyderabad, Telangana State. ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to allow the l-A. by setting aside the order in the above writ petition dismissal order for non prosecution dated 11.12.2025 and restore to file, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.BALAMUKUND [PARW-IN-PERSONI Counsel for the Respondents: --- The Court made the following: OROER This interlocutory application has been filed to set aside the order of dismissal for 'non prosecution', dt. 11.12.2025 and restore the writ petition to the file of the Court. Having regard to the reasons assigned in the acc ompanying affidavit, this intedocutory application is ordered and the writ petit on is restored to the file of the Gourt. //TRUE COPY// SD -M.OSMAN ALI BAIG ASI ISTANT REGISTRAR 1\1 SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI B.BALAMUKUND [PARTY-IN-PERSOI\ 2. One CC to Ms. V.NAGA LAKSHMI, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies BSR 4)- HIGH COURT PSKJ SCRJ DATED: 3011212025 ORDER l.A.No.1 ot 2025 IN WP.No.37437 ot 2025 2 DRAFTS :- --i:= .\ Ir{ts : o\ ()o1 9.. '',...,,/ \ t l l Cp SPil (. 2 I .* ORDERING THE I.A. & RESTORING THE W.P. TO ITS FILE tr,*