The High Court · 2025

...RespondenU De-facto Complainant .4^g2 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds ot cri,iinli p"tition, the High court may be pleased to quash the chargeshe"r sc iodlzb22 on the fire of Special sc/sr cases cum Vtl Additional District and sessions juose 3:H:l,"rjfjr"#r t.A. NO: 10F 2023 Petition under section.4g2 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds or cri,iinli' p"tition, the High court may be pleased to stav ail further proceeJrsr; sc jbotzozz on the fire of Speciar sc/sr cases cum vilt Additionat District and sesstons juoge 3ffi:l,t *1jr"#r t.A. NO: 1 0F 2025 Between Paska Raju, S/o.Paska Sayanna. Aged.28 years, Occ.. l-acour, R/o.Yergatla Village and Manca , Nizamabad District.. . ..Petitioner/Respondent No.2 in LA.lrlo:;.1 and 2 ot 2025 AND '1. Vasam Manoj, S/o.Gangadhar, Aged. 39 years, Occ. Brsiness, R/o.Yergatla Village and [\4andal, Nizamabad District.

2. Masam Shiva Krishna, S/o.Sudarshan, Aged. 25 years, Occ. Pvt. Employment, R/o.Yergatla Village and Mandal, Nizamabird District. ...Respondent /Accused No.1 & 2 in l.A. Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that jn the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition. tl'e High Court may be pleased Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit tl e Petitioner and Respondent/Accused herein to compromise the matter in SSO. No.100 of 2022 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for SC/ST Cases Crrm Vlll Additional District and Sessions Judge Court, At Nizamabad. t.A. NO 20F 202s Petition under Section 359 of BNSS praying that jn the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased Hon'ble Court may be pleased to compound ther offence in SC. No. 100 of 2022 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for SCi S f Cases Cum-Vlll Additional District and Sessions Judge Court, At Nizamaba(l for the offences punishable under sections 448, 427, 506 of IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atro,:it es) Act, 2015 and allow the parties to record the compromise. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumentri of Sri A BHUVANA SUNDER REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri M.Vivekananda Reddy, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Responcle rt No.1, and of Sri B. Manav Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE S RI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO I.A.Nos. land2 of2025 IN/AND CRIMINALPETTTION No.12739 of2023 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal petition has been filed under Section 4g2 of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 (for short, 'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioners, who were arrayed as accused Nos.l and 2, seeking to quash the proceedings in S.C.No,l00 of 2O22 on rhe file of Special Sessions Judge for SC/ST cases-cum-VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nizamabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 44g, 427 and.506 of the Indian penal Code, lg60 and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention Of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 20 15. 2 Heard Mr.A.Bhuvan Sunder Reddy, learned counsel for petltroners, Mr.M.ViVekananda Reddy, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No. I and Mr.B.Manav Kumar, leamed counsel for respondent No.2 { I l i I

3. During the pendency of this criminal petition, at the - \ intervention of rvell-wishers and elders, petitioners,/accused Nos. I and 2 and respondent No,2/de-facto comltlainant have entered into compromise to resolve the dispu tes pending between them and filed joint affldavit along with I.A.No.2 of 2025 and also filecl another I.A.No.1 of 2025 trt record the compromise and to compound the offences.

4. The above said applications came up for c tnsideration before this Courl on 19.09.2025, and this Cour-t directed the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 and 2, and respon<lent No.2/de- facto cornplainant, to appear before the Secretarl, Telangana High Court Legal Ser-vices Committee, alorrg with their identity cards for their identification, on or before

24.09.2025, and further directed the Telangan,r High Court Legal Services Committee to submit a report b.y, )8.1O.2025. Pursuant to the same, Telangana High Court Le11al Services Committee sr-rbmitted report dated 24.O9.2025.

5. Taking into consideration the above: facts and circumstances including joint memo filed by bo.-h the parties, /1" I I II I t___ I 5 proceedings in S.C.No. 100 of 2O22 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for SC/ST cases-cum-Vlll Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nizamabad, against the petitioner/accused Nos.1 and 2 are liable to be quashed

6. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings in S.C.No. lO0 of 2022 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for SC/ST cases-cum-Vl[I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nizamabad, against the petitioner/accused Nos.l and2 are hereby quashed. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/- A.PRATHIMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII ECTION OFFICER \rr,i To, 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 ,t\i LW The First Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Armoor. The Special Sessions Judge for SC/ST cases-cum-VllAdditional District and Sessions Judge Nizamabad. The Station House Officer, Yergatla Police Station, Nizamabad District. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] State of Telangana, Through Police Station Yergatla. rep.by Pub c One CC to Sri A.Bhuvan Sunder Reddy ,Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri B.Manav Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies (Along with Joint Memo is enclosed herewith) -| -_ -:.'] HIGH COURT DATED:0811012025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.1 and 2 o12025 ln/And CRLP.No.12739 of 2023 :,- 'l::;:- - \. i - -! : -:'- '..,_-i. '.c/,.1.- ir. :. ..:... (J 't r u[T 2U j,r .i 'r. \ ,.,.]l -a\ . . \: .'-: . -. , , !-rq::':j .."'- .. .- --:-, /- I I .J \... :.1 \\,i t\ ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL AND l.A.Nos.1 AND 2 OF 2025 \r \V\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD .. l.A. No of 2025 CRLP. No 12739 of 2023 BETWEEN: Paska Raju, S/o. Paska Sayanna, Aged about 30 years, Occ: Labour, R/o. Yergatla Village and Mandal, Nizamabad District. Petitio n e r/Res po n d ent no. 2 1 2 3 AND Vasam lVlanoj, S/o. Gangadhar, Aged about 41 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Yergatla Village and lVlandal, Nizamabad Dlstrict. Masam Shiva Krishna, S/o. Sudarshan, Aged about 27 years, Occ: Pvt Employee, R/o. Yergatla Village and Mandal, Nizamabad District. RespondenUAccused Nos. 1 & 2 STATE OF TELANGANA Rep. by its Public Prosecutor ln the High Court of Telangana RespondenURespondent JOINT IVIEMO lt/lay it please your Lordship 1 That due to the advice of elders and well wishers, both the parties have came forward to compromise the matter outside of Court, as the case filed against the above said persons due to misunderstanding That both the parties having no objection if the € - I I , : .- _ .t $ T criminal case is crosed against each other in sc, No. 1oo of 2022 on the file of Hon'ble Special Sessions Judge for SC/SI.Oases Cum Vlll Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court, At Nizarnabad for the offences punishable under sections 448, 427,506 of lF,C and Section 3(1)(x) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribe s (prevention of Atrocities) Act, 20.1 5. That the petitioner/Defacto

2. Complainant h: s agreed to withdraw the case against the Respondent/Accused r,,ide sc. No. 100 of 2022 on the file of Hon'ble Special Sessions Jud3e for SC/ST Cases Cum Vlll Addl District and Sessions JL drle Court, At Nizamabad unconditionally

3. That in view of the set ement reached between Lrs no purpose will be served if the proceedings iir s.c. No..,l5 of 20r6 on the fire of Additionat District Judge for trial of cases under SCiS.t (pOA) Act, Khammam is continued fu rth er. 4 5 That the continuation of the criminal proceedinr;s is coming in our way of living of peaceful life That the Petitioner/Defacto_complainant has nrr tbjection for proceeding to close the matter

6. ' Both the parties have agreed not to file cases against each ;

7. entered into compromise. The petitioner/De_facto affidavit in the above petition to that effect. That both the parties have setfled their dispute arnicably and complairrant filed an Therefore, both the parties pray this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to compound the offences in SC. No. 100 of 2022 on the flle of Hon'ble Special Sessions Judge for SC/ST Cases Cum Vlll Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court, At Nizamabad, in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. coun set fr, ink *ro complainant Petitigner/De-facto compla inant Counsel for the pon en ccused Respondent /Accused No. 1 P'W- 8"- 8, ry..-- -1'c1Y!- Respondent /Accused No. 2 Hyderabad Dt: ll -09-2025 lJ yt Vlb^ad. ' ,2 Y1' 31)dn ! I '1 I -'tr