High Court · 2025

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PE TITION NO:33796 OF 2024 Between: "='il " l,ffi ruU)* Sf ;[,P*XtSf $in;#i-,l"h,*:,X;'i;: H[3i' 2. Kaderi Ram !)/ohq1 Reddv, s/o: K Bu9h9 399dld ffi; ri:h"offn'?r':3333bf ' i'l;. i;-it, via'nva itr'gat cirionv' Kothakota villa! No 1 4'e ...PETITIONERS AND Municipal

1. The State of Telansana, Rgp. Uv i1s ryiTiP3l^q:cretary' ' no"rlGiLiion' oeiartileni Sec'retariate Hvderabad' 2. The District Collector, Wanaparthy District' Telangana' 3 The Kothakota Municipality, BgP' by Municipal Commissioner Kothakota - (V),(M)' Wanaparthy District' I elangana' 4. K. Ranqa Reddy, S/o: K' Bucha Reddy' Age,54 occ' Business' H No 14 - 8, vidhva r'rasar. cofini, X;i'h;i;i;Viil;sEir't)' w'n'p'rthv - 50e381' S.AShWiniNandaKumar,S/o:A.Bala.SwgqY,Ase5l.occ.Licenced Technical Person, il"ii;';i li-Allalao a'rian"u Nasar colonv saidabad HYderabad - 500059 - Telangana' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHigh,.Courtmaybe pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ' direction or order declaring the action of 3'd Respondent in granting the Building permission to the 4th respondent Vide BP *" aiol, Wl/2019;0034 on Dt' o4t11l2o1g' without having sanctioning power to the Authority for the Doc'NO 4645/20b8 for an Extent of 894'66 Sq' yrds' or 748.02 Sq. mtrs and without following the due process of law is illegal and against provisions of Telangana Municipal Corporations Act' 1994 (old Telangana I ! .,!"*7 Municipalities Ad, I 365) and also under new Telangana Ivunicipalities Act 2019. And TSBPASS 2120. And issuing the Speaking orders L-.No.G 1t6712024 Dt.221o712024 w'ith,:rut conducting panchiiiZha as per the proc. No. Hl74st2o24 Dt.291061202,[ and not in accordance with lbw as per the High court orders Dt. 13267 12024 and furrther not following the due process of larv in conducting Pancha Nama Dt29/0812024 and 1ol9t2o24 of the H. No 14 - B without giving notice to the applioitnts and not verifying the documents and the l\rlaster plan certain devrati,lns i:urd errors were supressed as on ground ard while issuing show cause Notice lJo. UC/22312024, Dt. 11logt2o24 and further s;ubmitting False Factual report to R[)MA Progs .ROC.No. 6952.18/RDMAlA1l2O24 in the appeal hearing held on :21 I 1)12024 and further issuing Speaking or,Jer oo Dt. o5l1ol2o24 No.G116712024 zrgairr not mentioning reasons to 4th Respondent again giving opportunity to the rl'rofficial respondent to file a new petition and to keep the pendency of the ma.ter as illegal ,arbitrary and in violation of Article 2.1 and 300-4 of the constitut on or rndia. And consequenfly direct the 3d resporrdent to decrare the building permissir>n issued 4th Respondent Vide Bp No.:11Og,'w1/20 1gloo34. on Dt.04/1 112019. as null and void. And to direct the Resporrden. No.3 to nullify the Panchnama Dt. '0rogr2o24. And direct 3'd Respondent to rnandate a new Panchnama as per Memo No. 2461/plg/llll2O2O and as per the proc. No. H174512024 Dt. 2gix6r2o24 in the presence of petitioners forrrwing the due process And din::t 2nd Respondent to take appropriate action againsl Respondent No.3 U,'s 48 and also against 4th and Sth respondenjs U/S 177 and 1 80(1 ) of the Tlre Te e ngana tVunicipality Act 2019. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition u nrier [iection '1 5'r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filecl irr support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct 3rd Respondent <otlakota [Vluniciparity to mandate a new panchnama as per Memo No. 2461lprgrr rt2o2o and According to the 2nd respondent F,roceeding No. H174512024' Dt. z9r)ar2o24 in the presence of petitioners foilc,wing the due process. By verif'7inc1 the Doc.No.464srzoo} and Doc. No.18033,,20.19 and the master plan, Vide BP lrlo.3'108Afl1/201910034. on Dt.04/1 112019 anC the structure where the Buildingr wir i constructed with boundaries of H. No 14-g. and to record the position of old Mud roof House No. 14-8. and the total area as per the Doc.No.4645i200B . pending disposal of the main writ petition' lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct 3d Respondent Kothakota tVlunicipality to issue Speaking orders according to lilemo No. .Ms.No. 168 IVA &UD (M) RAfl G.O.t\Is.No.245 MA 2461lplg'llll2l2j The Telangana Rules for Enforcement on Un Authorized. Developments and U/S 181 (1)of the Telangana tr/unicipality Act 2019, And TSBPAS Acl 2O20. To Seal The un Authorized construction and also to inform the Registering Authority Giving All Details of Unauthorized constructions/layo uts so as to include them in the Prohibitory Property register and shall also inform the concerned Electricity Mater Supply departments to not give any service connection either temporary or permanent to the respective unauthorized building Layout pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: M/S. VIJAYA LAXMI CH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SC FOR MUNICIPALITY Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI M. DAMODAR REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER III(]N'BLB SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHNIAN WRIT PETITION No.33796 OF 2021 ORAL ORDE[I. Ms (-'h t/ijaya Laxmi, learned counsel for thc petitioner, secks permission ,tl'tlris Courl to withdraw the present u,rit petition. She has also addrcssed a Ictter dated 02.01 .2025 to the Registrar'(.lLrrliciat) to that effect. I'hc sair' lctter is placed on record 'l-he p,rescnt Writ Petition is accordingly disrnissecl ar; rvithdrawn. However, therr' ;hall he no order as to costs As a sectt el, rriscellaneous petitions, if any, pcndinl; in the Writ Pet it ion slrull:'arrd closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ri\ tsEcTIoN oFFtcER I One CC 1o tr,4is. Vijaya Laxmi CH Advocate tqP.UCI- iwo CCs tc, Gt'}foi N/unicipal Administration Urban Development, High Court for the State o Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] fwo CC to Tht> GP fo-r Revenue, High Court for the State of Terlangana, at Hvderabad lO I l-l-l Ohe CC :o 5C tor tr/unicipality[OPUC] Two CD ,lopie s To, 1 2 3 4 TJ GJP HIGH COIJRT' DATED:0910112025 ORDER WP.No.33796 of 2024 1:lE {i}h; \r-.:'.\ u- 0 4 rf ll 2 16 ;; \\* ,.1 !..'t--, - :,. ..2' DISMISSING 'I'HE WRIT PETITION A WITHDRAWN WITHOUT CCISTS / /,n ,/s ,/t { /