The High Court · 2025

1 The State of Telangana, Rep, By its public prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad ,7 ...RESPONT ENT/RESPONDENT

2. Narala Kavitha, D/o Chendraiah, Aged about 34 years, (l lc. Housewife, R/o H.No. 10-1-205, Near Siddhartha School, Ram Nagar, l.i rimnagar Town and District. RESPONDENTS/DEFA( TO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS., praying that r the circumstances stated rn the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition the High Court may be pleased to quash the charge sheet in PRC.No. 36 of 2(): 5, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil J udge-Cum-J udicial Magistrate of First )lass, Ranga Reddy District at Shadnagar, registered for the offences u/s 69 ,36(b), 351 (3) BNS against the petitioners/ Al to A7. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Sectron 528 of BNSS., praying that r the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition .he High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/R-2 to compound the c ffences against the Petitioner/Accused No 1 to 7 and quash charge sheet in PR( .No. 36 of 2025, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil J udge-Cum-J udicial Magi ,trate of First Class. Ranga Reddy District at Shadnagar. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS., praying that ir stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition be pleased to record the compromise and quash charge sh: 2025, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge-Cum-jr First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Shadnagar against the I No 1to7 the circumstances he High Court may :t in PRC No. 36 of dicial Magistrate of 'etitioners/ Accused This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing t re Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumt-'rts of Sri MADANU NARESH, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Ms. K. Madha,i, Advocate for the respondent No.2 and Addl. Public Prosecutor on behalf of th: Respondent No. '1 The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT tr'OR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 IN AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.13826 of 2o25 Datez 24.12.2o25 Between: Porandla Srinivas and six others Petitioners/ Accused Nos. I to 7 AND The State of Tclangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad, and another . Respondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioners/ accused Nos. 1 to 7 seeking to quash the proceedings in PRC No.36 of 2025 on the fite of the Principal Junior Civil Juige-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Shadnagar.

2. Heard Mr.Madanu Naresh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms.K.Madhavi, learned counsel for respondent No.2, and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additionai Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that during the pendency of the present Criminal Petition, at the instance of the well 2 wishers, relatives and elders, the parties have set ,led the disputes pending between them and entered into comproml e and filed Joint Compromise Memo. Accordingly, the parties have f led I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 seeking permission to compound the olfer :cs and to record the compromise respectively.

4. This Court uide order, dated 16. I2.2O25, dt :cted the parties i.e., the petitioners and respondent No.2, to apperr before the High Court Legal Seruices Committee, Hyderabad, on or l :fore 20.12.2025. In compliance of the said order, the Secretarv, 1 tigh Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report, dated 1! .12.2025, stating that petitioner Nos.1 to 6 and respondent No.2 u.: -e duly identihed with copies of their Aadhar Cards/Voter ID Card. t is further stated that they have willfully and without any coeril on entered into compromise.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners subm 1 ,ed that though petitioner No.7/accused No.7 appeared before the {igh Court Legal Services Committee, his presence is not recorded cr his surname is not tallied with the Aadhar C: the ground that -d. He further submitted that Rachakonda Narsinga Rao @ Narsimha and Rachakatla Narsinga Rao, are one and the same. e filed the sworn affidavit of petitioner No.7/accused No.7 vide USR ll r.150406 of 2025 to that effect. 3

6. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 and the Iearned Additional Public Prosecutor have not disputed the same.

7. In view of the report submitted by the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and also in view of the compromise entered between the petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.2 ald 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the proceedings in pRC No.36 of 2025 on the filc of the principal Junior civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Shadna gar, are hereby quashed against thc petitioners/A1 to A7.

8. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,0OO/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and Rs.S,OOO/_ (Rupees Iive thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates, Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioners, on or before 09.O1.2026. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed SD/- A.H.S.GOWRI SHANKA AS ISTANT REGI R /iTRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, I

1. The Principal Junior Civil J udge-Cu m-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Shadnagar.

2. One CC to SRl. MADANU NARESH Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to A/ls. K. Madhavi, Advocaate (OPUC) 4. One CC to SRl. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Advocate IOUTI 5. Two CD Copies NOTE' That e trrfal alr-rnnnt of Rs 15 OOO/- h"c hecn haid tnurerlc tha .^cf ^rri ^f .rrhinh Rs. l0.0tl0l- tRs. Ten tltousartd onlyl to the High ( ourl I clrrl :e rr iccs ( ummittec' I{yderabad, and Rs.5,000/- (Rs. Five thousand only) to the'lelanga"na I igh Court Advocates' / Assooiation, Hyderabad and a memo filed to that elfect by Sri VIada ru Naresh' Advocate' t vide USSR No.1 5295612025, dt.3l .12.2025 ASR,?SL t i iiE SI4 \,( '";:p HIGH COURT DATED:2411212025 \ r-' o() a .,* ORDER IA.NOS. 2 and 3 ot 202 IN/AND CRLP.No.13826 of 2025 ALLOWING THE CRLP 1O \*