flL:"%-?is:$siy:i v. 'I . The state of reranoana

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be ...RESPONDENTS pleased to pass an orders, or iqsue any directions or issue any appropriate writ more particulcrrly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondent No.3 in providing police protection to thee petitioner's subject open plot bearing No.71lA admeasuring to an extent of 166.66 sq.yards in Sy.No. 341 situated at lVlaskapur village shivar, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim lnjunction orders dated 17.10.2024 in l.A. No. 72 of 2023 in O S. No 28 of 2023 on the file of the Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge at Khanapur, de!;pite receipt of petitioner's written representation dated 16.04.2025 as being illegzrl, arbitrary and violation of Articles 21 and 300A of Constitution of lndia, consequently direct the respondents No. 3 to provide police protection to the petitioner':; said open plot bearing No.7'llA admeasuring to an extent of 166.66 sq.yar,is in Sy.No. 341 situated at [Vlaskapur village shivar, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim lnjunction orders dated 17.10.2024 in l.A. No. 72 of 2023 in O.S. No. 28 of 2023 on the fite of the Honorable Junior Civil Judge at Khanapur. lA NO: 1 OF 2(t25 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 3 to consider representation of the petitioner dated 16.04.2025 for grant of police protection to the petitioner's said open plot admeasuring to an extent of 166.66 sq. yards in Sy.No.341 situated at Maskapur village shivar, Khanapur firlandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim lnjunction orders dated 17.10.2024 in l.A. No. 72 of 2023 in O.S. No. 28 of 2023 on the file of ttre Honorable Junior Civil Judge at Khanapur, pending disposal of main Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ALLURI DIVAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : SRI R.LAXMIKANTH REDDY,AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.4to8 : -- W.P.No. 14 oF 2025 Between: Bhukya Surendar, S/o. Tharachand, Age 53 years, occ- Agriculture, R/o Gosamoalli village, PathayellapurPost, Khanapur Tbwn, Nirmal District - ...PETITIONER AND 1 Jhe SJale.oj TJlgngalg,.Rep., by its principat Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Nirmal District. 3. The Station House Officer, Khanapur police Station, Nirmal District. 4. Ayinaboyina Pedda Narsaiah @ Ayinaveni peddolla Narsaiah. s/o Narsimulu. -F/o Maskapur, Khanapur'ManOai f.f irmii A9e 52 years, Occ- Agricultu-re District. 5 Ayinaboyina @ .Ayinaveni Narendhar, S/o Ayinaboyina peddha Narsaiah Peddolla. Narsaiah, Age- 38 years, Occ- Agriculiure, R7o Maskapur, Khanapur lVlandal, Nirmal District.

6. Ayinaboyina Nadipi Narsaiah @ Ayinaveni Narsaiah, s/o Avinabovina pedda N.arsaiah Ayinaveni Peddolla Narsaiah, Age- 35 years, Oci_ Agri6ulture, Rl/o Maskapur, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal Distri-ct.

7. Ayinaboyina chinna Narsaiah @ Ayinaveni Narsaiah, s/o Ayinabovina pedda Narsaiah Ayinaveni Peddolla \-arsaqqlr, Age- 32 years, Oci- AS#utirre, R/o Maskapur, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal Distriit B. Ayinaboyina Naresh, Sio Ayinaboyina pedda Narsaiah @ Avinaveni peddolla Narsaiah., 1A.ge- 30 years, Occ- Agiriculture, Fl/o Maskap[r, (tranabur MJ;d;t, Nirmal District. .RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an orders, or issue any directions or issue any appropriate writ more particularly in the nature of wRIT oF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondent No.3 in providing police protection to the petitioner's subject open plot bearing No.35/A admeasuring to an extent of 166.66 sq.yards in Sy.No. 341 situated at Maskapur village shivar, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim lnjunction orders dated 17.10.2024 in l.A. No. 61 of 2023 in o.S. No. 25 of 2023 on the file of the Hon'ble Junior: civil Judge at Khanapur, despite receipt of petitioner's written representation dated 16.o4.202s as being illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 21 and 3004 of constitution of lndia, consecruentry direct the respondents No. 3 to provide porice protection to the petitioner's said open prot bearing No.35/A admeasuring to an extent of 166.66 sq. y:rrds in Sy.No. 341 situated at Maskapur viflage shivar, Khanapur tvlandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim lnjunction orders dated 17.10.2024 irr l.A. No. 61 of 2023 in O.S No. 25 of 2023 on the file of the Honorable Junior Civil Judge at Khanapur. IA NO: oF 20 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavil filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 3 to consider representation of the petitioner dated 16.o4.2025 for grant of police protection to the petitioner's said open prot admeasuring t'l an extent of 166.66 sq. yards in Sy.No. 341 situated at Maskapur village shivar, Khanapur fVlandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim lnjunction orders dated 12.10.2024 in t.A. No. 61 of 2023 in 0.s. No. 2s of 2023 on the file of rhe Hon'bre Junior civir Judge at Khanapur,, pending disposar of main Writ Petit on in the interest of Justice. Counsel.for the Petitioner : SRt ALLURT DTVAKAR REDDY counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : sRr R.LAXMTKANTH REDDY,AGP FoR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.4tog i _- w.P. 0.32157 OF 2O2s Between: Nunavath Sunitha, wo. Nunavath rhirupathi, Age 36.years, occ. Agricurture, Rro odde Lingapur v'iilage, Bhupathipur post,'Raiibi rrTinoir, .lagtiat Diitricl - - '- "' " AND Secretariat Buitdin{s, XyaerbOari.

1. The State of Telanoana 8"p,, by its principal Secretary, Home Department, 2. The Superintendent of police, Nirmal District. 3. The Station House Officer, Khanapur police Station, Nirmal District. ...PETITIONER 4 c Ayinaboyina Pedda Narsaiah alias Ayinaveni peddolla Narsaiah, S/o Narsimulu, Age 52 years, Occ. Agriculture Fl/o Maskapur, Khanapur Mandal Nirmal District. Ayinaboyina alias Ayinaveni Narendhar, S/o Ayinaboyina peddha Narsaiah alias Peddolla \ap.q!ah, fg9. Q8 Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District. years, Occ. Agricuttirre, R/o Maskapui, b lyinaboyina Nadipi Narsaiatr alias Ayinaveni Narsaiah, S/o Ayinaboyina Pedda Narsaiah_Ayinaveni Peddolla Narsaiah, Age. 35 years, Occ. ' - Agriculture, R/o fvlaskapur, Khanapur Mandal, Niimal District.' 7. Ayinaboyina Chinna Narsaiah alias Ayinaveni Narsaiah, S/o Ayinabovina Pedda. Narsaiah.Ayinaveni Peddolla Narsaiah, Age. 32 years, 'Occ. -' - Agriculture, Ri/o Maskapur, Khanapur lvlandal, Niimal Dstrict.' B. Ayinaboyina Naresh, S/o Ayinaboyina pedda Narsaiah alias Ayinaveni Peddolla.Narsaiah, Age. 30 years, Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o Mask5pur, khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of rhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an orders, or issue any directions or issue any appropriate writ more particularly in the nature of wRlr oF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondent No.3 in providing police protection to the petitioner,s subject open plot bearing No.'l 6/A admeasuring to an extent of 166.66 sq.yards in Sy.No.341 situated at Maskapur village shivar, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim lnjunction orders dated 17t10t2o24 in l.A. No. 63 of 2023 in o.S. No. 26 of 2023 on the file of Honourable Junior civil Judge at Khanapur, despite receipt of petitioner's Nritten representation dated 1610412025 as being illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 21 and 300A of constitution of lndia, consequently direct the respondents No. 3 to provide police protection to the petitioner's said open plot bearing No.1 6/4 admeasuring to an extent of 166.66 sq. yards in Sy.No. 341 situated at Maskapur village shivar, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim lnjunction orders dated 17 -10.2024 in l.A. No. 63 ot 2o23 in o.S. No. 26 ol 2023 on the file of the Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge at Khanapur. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 15'l cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents No. 3 to consider representation of the petitioner dated 16104r2o2s for grant of porice protection to the petitioner,s said open prot admeasuring to an extent of 166.66 sq. yards in Sy.No. 341 situated at Maskapur v:rrage shivar' Khanapur [\rrandar, Nirmar District in pursuant to absolute interim lnjunction orders dated 17.10.2024 inl.A. No. 63 of 2023 in o.s. No. 26 of 2(t23 on the fire of the Honourabre Junior civir Judge at Khanapur, pending disp,tsal of main Writ petition in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ALLURI DTVAKAR REDOY counsel forthe Respondents No.1to3 : sRr R.LAXMTKANTH REDDY,AGp FoR HoME Counsel for the Respondents No.4tog : -- W.P.No. 189 F 202s Between: lvlohammed Jamal, S/o Fakeer Kasab gully, Sainagar, Khanapur town, Nirmat'Disjrictl .Mohammed., _Agg 5.1 years, Occ. Business, Rt/o ' AND ...PETITIONER '- ' rrivit/er vvvrL Secretariat Buildings, HydeA6a-d

1. The State of Telanoana, Bep,, by its principal Secretary, Home Department, 2. The Superintendent of police, Nirmal District. 3. The Stalion House Officer, Khanapur police Station, Nirmal District. 4 Ayinabo'7ina Pedda Narsaiah @_Ayinaveni peddoila Narsaiah, S/o Narsimuru. Ag9 p2 years, occ. Agricutture-Rl/,itrrtrst ipui (f,aiuprifrrrinir]r'rrrifi;i"'"'", District. Mandal, Nirmal Distridt. 'pI[ATi:"!:,"@,1,{:xJ::t}?:?i}3is;i,i#IJtf, 3:Jt?J,fi:1l:il?.i{f 13,, 6. Ayinaboyila Nadipi Narsaiah @Ayinaveni Narsaiah, S/o Ayinaboyina pedda Narsaiah @.Ayinaveni peddoti5 tt'arsaiin, Age. is vears,CjCc. ng,riCufiriJjilo Maskapur, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmat OAtiici]-' -- ' T Ayinaboyina chinna [email protected] Narsaiah, s/o Ayinaboyina pedda rr, O6". ed,i";Id;: - - 8. Ayinaboyina Naresh. S/o Ayinaboyina pedda Narsaiah @ Ayinaveni peddoila 30 years, o'cc. Asiicurture, nyo rr,rJJr,.p,[ kfr;;;p;; iv;ffii: N a rsa ia h @ Avi na ven i peddot tiNalsaian, Age. R/o Mask a--pur, Khana pur Minoii,' rrr i niii' ijiiiiii-' -32j,dr Nflfilig,:rffl? ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an orders, or issue any directions or issue any appropriate writ more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondent No. 3 in providing police protection to the petitioner's subject land admeasuring 0.01 Guntas in Sy.No. 341, 0.05 Guntas in Sy.No. 341/A, 0.10 Guntas in Sy.No. 341lAA in total an extent of 0.16.Guntas situated at Maskapur Village shivar of Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District inpursuant to absolute interim lnjunction orders dated 17.1O.2024 in l.A. No. 65 of 2023 in O.S. No. 27 ot 2023 on the file of the Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge at Khanapur despite receipt of petitioner's written representation dated 16.04.2025 as being illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 21 and 3004 of Constitution of lndia, consequently direct the respondents No.3 to provide police protection to the petitioner's said land admeasuring 0.01 Guntas in Sy.No. 341, 0.05 Guntas in Sy.No. 341/A, 0.10 Guntas in Sy.No. 341lAA in total an extent of 0.16 Guntas situated at Maskapur Village shivar of Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim lnjunction orders dated 17.1O.2024 in l.A. No. 65 ol 2023 in O.S. No. 27 of 2023 on the file of the Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge at Khanapur. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 3 to consider representation of the petitioner dated

16.04.2025 for grant of police protection to the petitioner's said land admeasuring

0.01 Guntas in Sy.No. 341, 0.05 Guntas in Sy.No. 341/A, 0.10 Guntas in Sy.No. 341lAA in total an extent of 0.16 Guntas situated at Maskapur Village shivar of Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim lnjunction ordersdated 17.1O.2024 in l.A. No.65of 2023 in O.S. No.27 of 2023 onthefile of the Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge at Khanapur,pending disposal of main Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ALLURI DIVAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : SRI R.LAXMIKANTH REDDY,AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.4to8 : W.P.No.32190 OF 2025 Between: Kuntala H.No. 28-40/1, Ambedkar Nagar, Khana[ur towir, Nirmal District Ganllanna, S/o. Shekanna, Age 35 years, Occ. private Employee, R/o. ^ AND 1 The State o_l Telangana, Rep., by its principal Secretary, Home Department, Secret:rriat Buildings, Hyderdbad. ...PETITIONER

2. The Sucerintendent of Police, Nirmal District. 3. The St:rtion House Officer, Khanapur police Station, Nirmal District. 4. Ayinaboyina- P"._d!a Narsaiah . alias Ayinaveni peddolla Narsaiah, S/o Narsimulu, Age 52 years, occ. Agricurturi: R/o Maskapui, knanipJ. rvianlai Nirmal l)istrict. 5 Ayinabc,yina ahas Ayinav_eni Narendhar, S/o Ayinaboyina peddha Narsaiah Peddolle Narsaiah. Aoe. 38 years, Occ. Agriculture, ny6 VtastipurlKh;n;il; Mandal Nirmal Diatricl.

6. Ayinabcyina Nadipi Narasaih arias Ayinaveni Narsaiah, s/o Avinabovina pedda Narsaiah Ayinaveni peddolla Narsaiah, Age. 35 ye'ars, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Maskapur, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmat Diitrict.

7. Ayinaboyina chinna Narsaiah alias Ayinaveni Narsaiah, s/o Avinabovina Pedda, Narsaiah. Ayinaveni peddolla' Narsaiah, nge.' er- G;;;,* 6;;. Agriculture, R/o Maskapur, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal DiEtrict. 8. lyinabovh.a N.aqesl-r, s/o Ayinaboyina pedda Narsaiah arias Avinaveni Peddollzr Narsaiah, Age. 30 ye-ars, OLc. Agriculture, nlo ff4isGpur, kfr;;;;; Mandal, Nirmal District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pas s an orders, or issue any directions or issue any appropriate writ more particularly in the nature of wRlr oF MANDAIUUs declaring the inaction of the respondent No.3 in providing police protection to the petitioner,s subject open plot bearing No.34/A admeasuring to an extent of 166.66 sq.yards in sy.No. 341 situ ated at t\/askapur village shivar, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to;rbsolute interim lnjunction orders dated 17.10.2024 in l.A. No. 59 of 2023 in o.s. No. 24 of 2o23 on the file of the Hon'ble Junior civil Judge at Khanapur, despite receipt of petitioner'd written representation dated 16.04.2o2s as being illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 21 and 300A of Constitution of lndia, consequently direct the respondents No. 3 to provide police protection to the petitioner's said open plot bearing No.34/A admeasuring to an extent of 166.66 sq. yards in Sy.No.341 situated at Maskapur village shivar, Khanapur lVlandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim lnjunction orders dated 17.10.2024 in l.A. No. 59 of 2023 in O.S. No. 24 of 2023 on the file of the Honourable Junior Civil Judge at Khanapur. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 3 to consider representation of the petitioner dated 16.O4.2025 for grant of police protection to the petitioner's said open plot admeasuring to an extentof 166.66 sq. yards in Sy.No.341 situated at lVlaskapur village shivar, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim lnjunction orders dated 17.10.2024 in l.A. No. 59 of 2023 in O.S. No.24 of 2023 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge at Khanapur, pending disposal of main Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ALLURI DIVAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : SRI R.LAXMIKANTH REDDY,AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.4to8 : The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER 7 TIIE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUI{ARAMJI WRIT PE'TITION Nos.32136. 32147. 32157. 32189 and 3219O oF. 2025 COMMOII ORDER: W.P.No.32L36 of 2o25 This Writ Petition is frled under Article 226 of Constitution ol India s,:eking the following relief/s:- "...1o pass an orders, or lssue any directions or issue any appropiate. writ nore particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaing tle iLaction of the. respondent No. 3 in prouiding police protection to three petiti>ners subject open plot bearing No.71/A admeasuing to an ertent of 166.66 sq.yards in Sy.No. 341 situated at Maskapur uillage shiuar, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal Distict in pursuant to absolute interim Injun:tion ord.ers dated 17.10.2024 in I.A. No. 72 of 2O23 in O.S. No. 28 of 2023 ort ihe fiIe of the Hon'ble Junior Ciuil Judge at Khanapu1 despite receipt of petitioners witten representation dated 16.04.2025 as being illegat, arbitrary and uiolation of Articles 21 and 3OOA of Constihttion of Indiq consequently direct the respondents IVo. 3 to prouide police protection to tlrc petitioners said open plot beaing No.7 1 / A admeasuing to an extent of 166.66 sq.yards in Sy.No. 341 situated at Maskapur utllage shiuar, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal Distict in pursuant to absolute interhn Injunction orders dated 17.10.2024 in I.A. No. 72 of 2023 in O.S. No. 28 of 2023 on the fiIe of the Honourable Junior Ciutl Judge at Khanapur and to pass... " W.P.No.3i2L47 of 2o25 This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India se eking the following relief/s:- "...to ,cass an orders, or issue ang directions or issue any appropriate writ nrore particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent /Vo. 3 in prouiding police protection to th.e 2 petitioners subject open plot beaing No.35/A admeasuing to an extent of 166.66 sq.gards in Sy.No. 341 situated at Maskapur uillage shiuar, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute inteim lnjunction ord.ers dated 17.10.2024 in I-A. No- 61 of 2023 in O-S. No- 25 of 2O23 on the file of the Hon'ble Junior Ciuil Judge at Khanapur, despite receipt of petitioners witten representation dated 16.04.2025 as being illegal, arbitrary and uiolation of Articles 21 and 300A of constitution of India, anseqtently direct the respondents No. 3 to prouide police protection to tlrc petitioners said open plot bearing No.35/ A admeasuring to an ertent of 166.66 sq. yards in Sy.No. 341 situated at Maskapur village shiuar, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal Distr1ct in pursuant to absolute inteim Injunctionorders dated 17.10.2024 in I.A- No. 61 of 2023 in O.S. No. 25 of 2023 on the file of th.e Honourable Juntor Auil Judge at Khanapur and to poss... " W.P.No.321 57 of 2ol25 This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- o...to pass an orders, or issue ang directions or issue any appropiate wit more partiatlartg in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS dedaing the inaction of the respondent No. 3 in prouiding police protection to the petitioners subject open plot bearing No. 16/ A admeasuring to an extent of 166.66 sq.gards in Sy.No.341 situated at Maskapur uillage shiuar, Khanapur Mand.al, Nirmal Dstrict in pursuant to absolute interim Injunction orders dated 17/ 10/ 2024 in I.A. No- 63 of 2023 in O.S- No. 26 of 2023 on tlrc fite of Honourable Junior Ciuil Judge at Khanapur, despite receipt of petitioners Nritten representation dated 16/04/2025 as being illegat, arbitrary and violation of Articles 21 and 300A of constitution of India, ansequently direct the respondents No. 3 to prouide police protection to the petitioners said open plot beaing No.16/A admeasuring to an ertent of 166.66 sq. yards rn sy.No. 341 situated at Maskapur village shiuar, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim Injunction orders dated 17.10.2024 in I.A. No. 63 of 2023 in O.s. No. 26 of 2O23 on tle jite of the Hon'ble Junior ciuil Judge at Khanapur and. to pass..." 3 W.P.No.321 89 of 2o.25 This; Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India s:eking the following relief/s:- "...1o pass an orders, or issue any directions or issue any approprtate writ more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declanng the inaction of the respondentNo. 3 in prouiding police'protection to the petitrtners subject land admeasuring 0.01 Guntas in Sy.No. 341, 0.05 Gurrtrs lrr Sy.No. 341/A, 0.10 Guntas in Sy.No. 341/AA in total an ertert of 0.16 Guntas situated at Maskapur Village shiuar of Khanapur Marulal, Nirmal Dstrict in pursuant to absolute interim Injunction orders date-d 17.1O.2024 in I.A. No. 65 of 20231n o.S. No. 27 of 2023 on the file of tl'.e Hon'ble Juntor Ciuit Judge at Khanapur despite receipt of petitixters written representation dated 16.04.2025 as betng illegal' arbtt;ary and uiolation of Articles 21 and 30OA of Constitution of Indta, ansequently direct the respondents No. 3 to prouide police protection to the petitioners said land admeasuring O.OI Guntas in Sy./Vo- 341, 0-05 Guntts irr Sy.No. 341/A, O.1O Guntas in Sy.No. 341/AA in total an exter.t of O.16 Guntas situated at Maskapur Village shiuar of Khanapur Marulal, Nirmal Distict in pursuant to absolute interim Injunction orders dated 1 7.10.2024 in I.A. No. 65 of 2023 in O.S. No- 27 of 2023 on the file of ttut Honble Junior Ciuil Judge at Khanapurond to pass...' II/.P.No.32L9O of 2o25 Thit; Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India s,leking the following relief/s:- "...to pass an orders, or issue any directions or issue any appropriate wit nore particularlg tn the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaing the ilnction of the respondent No. 3 in prouiding police protedion to the petititners subject open plot bearing No.34/A admeasuing to an ertent of 1e6.66 sq.yards in Sy.iVo. 341 situated at Maskapur uillage shiuar, Khanapur Mandal, Nirmal Distict in pursuant to absolute inteim Injunction orders dated 17.10.2024 in I.A. No. 59 of 2O23 in O.S- No. 24 of 2023 on the fite of the Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge at Khanapur, despite 4 receipt of petitioners written representation dated 16.04.2025 as being iuegal, arbitrary and uiolation of Articles 21 and 300A of corstitution of Ind.ia, ansequently direct the respondents No. 3 to prouide police protection to the petittoners said open plot bearing No.34/ A admeasuing to an ertent of 166.66 sq. yards in Sg.No. 341 situated at Maskapur uillage shiuar, Khanapur Mandql, Nirmal District in pursuant to absolute interim Injunction orders dated 17.1O.2O24 in I.A. No. 59 of 2023 in o.s. No. 24 of 2023 on the file of the Honourable Junior Ciuil Judge at Khanapur and to pass-.. "

2. Since the issues raised in these Writ Petitions are identical in nature, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

3. Heard Mr.Alluri Divakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Go.vernment Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

4.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that respondent No.3 has failed to provide police protection pursuant to the petitioners' representation dated L6.O4.2025, which sought protection in furtherance of the interim injunction orders granted in I.A. No.72 of 2023 in O.S. No.28 of 2023, I.A- No.61 of 2023 in O.S. No.25 of 2O23, I.A. No.63 of 2023 in O.S. No.26 of 2023, I.A. No.65 of 2023 in O.S. No.27 of 2023, atfi, LA- No-59 of 2023 in O.S. No.2a of 2O23, all pending before the learned Junioq- Civil 5 Judge, Khanapur. It is contended that despite the subsistence of these interim orders, the respondent authorities have failed to act upon the petitioners'representation. Hence, these writ petitions have beerL flled seeking appropriate directions for implementation of the sai<l orders and for grant of police protection.

4.2. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly conceded that the petitioners have not approacht:d the trial Court by fiiing an appropriate application seeking F'olice protection in aid of the interim orders already granted. In vier,l, of the same, this Court expressed its inclination to direct the petitioners to approach the trial Court for such relief. Accordingly, learned counsel requested that a direction for expeditiotrs disposal of any such application to be filed before the trial Courl may be issued.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the res,pondents, submits that the petitioners'prayer for police protection is not supported by any specific direction from the civil Court mandating such protection. It is further contended that the petitioner:;, without hrst approaching the trial Court, have invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which is ordinarily not \i - 6 maintainableinsuchcircumstances'exceptinexceptionalor extraordinary cases. However, since the petitioners have expressedtheirwillingnesstomovethetrialCourtforthesaid relief,learnedGovernmentPlead.ersubmitsthattheymaybe permitted' to do so, and accordingly prays for dismissal of the present writ Petitions 6 Ihaveperusedthematerialonrecord'andconsideredthe submissions. T.Itisevidentfromthesubmissionsofthepetitionersthat theyhadsubmittedarepresentationtothepoliceauthorities seeking implementation of the interim injunction orders passed bythecivilCourtandsoughtpoliceprotectionbasedonthose orders. However, it is an admitted fact that the petitioners have not filed any application before the trial court seeking a direction to the police for enforcement of those interim orders'

8.Itisawell-settledpropositionoflawthatwhenacivilCourt grants an interim injunction, and a party apprehends violation thereof,theappropriatecourseofactionistoapproachthesame court for enforcement, including seeking police aid under its inherentpowersorund.erOrd.erxxxxRule2-AoftheCodeof 7 civil Procedure, 1908. The writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot crdinarily be invoked for implementation of civil Court orders, as held by the Honble Supreme court in K.K. velusamg u. rr. Patanisomy [(2ort) 11 scc 2TSl and state of Bihar u. Dhirendrtt Kumar [(1995) 4 SCC 22gl

9. Further, Honble division bench of this court in Kabhakula Padma v. state of Telangana and othersr and Mudraboina odhelu and ors., vs. State of relangana and others2, in reiteration, it has been affirmatively hetd that a petition seeking police protection for enforcement or implementation of an injunction order under Article 226 of the constitution of India shall ordinarily not be entertained, unless it is demonstrated that there exists an element o1'public injury or public interest, and that the remedies available under the code of civil procedure, 19og, for enforcement of the injunction, have been exhausted.

10. In view of the foregoing legal position and consid.ering the submission of the petitioners expressing their readiness to avail the efficacious alternative remedy available under the code of civil Procedure, 1908, directing such course of action is found .;rOpri&tr:. 2023 (t) ALT 755 (DB) TS) MANU/TLI03 5')t2023 2 i\ \- \ 8 ll.Accordingly,thepetitionersaredirectedtoapproachthe trial court by filing an appropriate application seeking police protection, if the cause of action still survives. Upon such application being fiied, the learned Junior civil Judge, Khanapur, is directed to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, on priority, preferably within eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

12. With the above direction, these writ Petitions stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs' Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/.B. REKHA RANI SISTANT SECTION OFFICER To,

1. T.he Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad Telangana State,

2. The Superintendent of Police, Nirmal District. 3. The Station House officer, Khanapur police station, Nirmal District. 4. One CC to SRI ALLURI DIVAKAR REDDY, Advocate. IOPUCI 5. Two ccs to GP FoR HOME, High court for the State of relangana. [oUT] 6 Two CD Copies. & BSK BS HIGH COURT DATED:125110t2025 c...) ,j,\' , ..{ () * COMMOT\I ORDER WP.No.32:"13G, 321 41, 321 57, 321gg & 32190 CtF 2025 I 0 6 rtB 2026 .>. FF,T;I. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS q x 3\ ') ?T