Smt. Choppavarapu Naga Su9!rla. w/o ch. Pavan Kumar v. 1. The state of Telangana

Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstan.". $trt"d in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus by decraring the action of the respondents in pending consideration of petitioners representation dated 25t1012024 as illegal' arbitrary and unconstitutional, and consequently direct the respondents to take steps to regularize the land admeasuring 155 sq. yards in Sy.No.288, Cherlapally Village of Kapra Mandal, ttledchal-ttlalkajgiri District adjacent to petitioners plots No'1 AND 2, in Cherlagtally Old Village, Kapra fvlandal, Under GHMC Kapra Circle, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, in my favour. I.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim orders direr;ting the Sth respondent not to interfere with petitioners plots No.1 AND 2, in Cherlapally Old Village, Kapra Mandal, Under GHIVC Kapra Circle, tr/edchal-Malkajgiri District, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KONDA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents : SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER t THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT pETITION No.B21B8 of 2O2S ORDER: This writ Petition is liled praying this court to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner,s representation, dated 25.1o.2024 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently, direct the respondents to take steps to regularize the land admeasuring 155 square yards in sy.No.288 of cherlapally village, Kapra Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District, which is situated adjacent to the petitioner,s plot Nos.1 and 2 in his favour and for other appropriate reliefs. 2- Heard Sri Konda Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and with their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had purchased the open prot Nos.l and 2 each admeasuring 2oo square yards situated at Brock No.2, cherlapally old village, Kapra Mandal, Medchar-Malkajgiri District, through registered sale deed bearing document 2 YEHrt:Aa.l.q ':'{-?: \--' ':r'1r' \'' I ' EVV, J Wp_32138 _2025 - No.3850 of 2024, dated 18.03.2024 and since then, she has been in F)eaceful possession and enjoyment of the same. i,earned couinsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner etlso obtained LR proceedings, dated 18.O4.2018 uid"e proceedings No.LRS18042018033933 from the Zonal Comrnissioner of GHMC (East Zonel prior to obtaining sanctioned pian for stilt + four upper floors ui-de Permit No.1559/GHMC/LBN 12O24-BP, dated 11.06.2024 which is valid from 1I.12.2024 to 11.06.2027. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that when the petitioner is proceeding to start construction work, respondent No.S sent their officials and staff and warned her to stop the construction u,ork stating that some portion of her property is covered by Government land and after obtaining the oral information, the petitioner rrade a representation, dated 25.IO.2O24 before respondent No.3 to regularize the alleged extent of land in her favour on payment of market value and if the same is not regularized, her propertlr will be shapeless and not fit for construction of the residential building. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner also received infrlrmation from respondent No.S stating that the land admeasuring 155 square yards covered in Sy.lrlo.288 is a Ii -) EVV, J Wp_32138 2025 Government land. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that respondent No.5 uide Lr.No.Bl2lO3l2024, dated 23.11.2024 had recommended for regularization of the Iand to an extent of 155 square yards of Government land situated in Sy.No.288 of Charlapally Village in favour of the petitioner on payment of market value and the same was forwarded by respondent No.4 to respondent No.3 uide Lr.No.B3/22O I 2024, dated 20.O3.2O25. Respondent No.3-the District Collector , uide Lr. No. E2 / 2463 I 2024 , dated

19.O4.2O25, had sought instructions/orders from respondent No.2, who had in turn forwarded the same to respondent No.1 uide CCLA's LT.No.CMRO-II/30866L9 I 2025, dated O8.O7.2025. The grievance of the petitioner is that, even after receipt of the same, respondent No.l did not take any action on the recommendations made by respondent Nos.2 to 4.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that there is no provision for regularizing the land which is in possession of the petitioner on payment of market value and in the absence of any provision or the prevailing law for regularizing the subject property in favour Fd of the petitioner, the case of the petitioner is to be forwarded to 4 EVV, J Wp_32138-2025 respondent No.1. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further s;ubmit that the validity or otherwise of G.O.Ms.Nos.58 and 59, Rcvenue (Assn.l) Department, dated 30.12.2014, which have been issued for regularization of the Government land on payment of market value, is pending for consideration before tlris Court in W.P.(PIL) Nos.109 of 2016 and 8 of 2015 and thereforc, the respondents are not in a position to take any action on the petitioner's application and after disposal of the above WI' (PIL) Nos.1O9 of 2016 and 8 of 2015 the same would be considered.

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and after perusing the material placed on record, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition directing respondent No.1 to pilss appropriate orders on the recommendations made by respondent Nos.2 to 5 strictly in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless tc mention that the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies as available under law. I i 5 EW, J Wp_32138 2025

6. With the above directions, this writ Petition is disposed of. No costs

7. As a sequel, the misceilaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. /TRUE COPY// SD/. C. DEEPIKA STANT REGIS SECTION OFFICER I To Ambedkar a State ang ana, OPPosite

1. The PrinciP al Secretary, Revenue Secretariat, State of Telangana at 2 The Chief Commissioner of Land AnnaPu rna Hotel, NamPa llv Station Road, Abids, HYdera bad-01 altt/lalkajgiri District, lntegrated District Office 3. The District Collector, [tled Complexes, AnthaiPallY Villag e, ShameerPet Mandal, ft/led chaltvlalkajgiri District, Telang ana - 78 4. The Revenue Division offi cer, Keesara Division, Keesara' Medchaltt/alkajgiri ra Mandal, Sai eriy, Colony, tMedchal-Malkajgiri District' 5. The Tahsildar, KaP 6 +fl383:?f$".o* REVENUE, Hish court for the State of reransana at T . 6'": #i; s'ni(6NoA sRtNlvAs' Advocate [oPUc] B. Two CD CoPies District, Telanga na State-501301 Hvderabad. [OUT] SA PVL HIGH COURT DATED:2511012025 ORDER WP.No.32138 of 2025 ( B. 1He S 14 )'4: ,)) (_) 0 E N0\J zuti D 2 t * PAICT DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. alttLer