✦ High Court of India · 16 Apr 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 16 Apr 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
16 Apr 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
2,351 words

lT.Mandali Aruna, Wo Srisailam, Aged about 44 yea-s Rlo Plot No.23, Occ Cooli I ,.L lB.Avagani Laxmamma, Wo Ushaiah, Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No-24, Occ Cooli l9.Raparthy Thyannma, Wo lVlallesham, A.ged about 48 years, R/o PIot No.31, Occ Cooli

20. Renukuntla [-avannya, Wo Sridhar, Aged about 44 years R/o Plot No.30, Occ Cooli

21.Deepa Shanti, Wo Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 41 years R/o Plot No.130, Occ Cooli

22.Ammi Reddy Kalpana, Wo Anji Reddy, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.129, Occ Cooli

23. Gujala Geetha, Wo Yadava Reddy, Aged about 42 years, R/o Plot No.26, Occ Cooli

24. Koturu Butchamma, Wo Narasimha Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.27, Occ Cooli

25.Mareboina Nagamma, Wo Ashok, Aged about 48 years,R/o PIot No.28, Occ Cooli

26.Mareboina Shoba Rani, Wo Venkat Ramulu, Aged about 46 years, R/o Plot No.29, Occ Cooli 2T.Mukkamula Kalpana, Wo Naga Raju, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.34 Occ Cooli (All are residents of Mammillagudem, Nalgonda town and District) ...PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. The District Oollector. Nalgonda. Nalgonda District. 2 3. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Nalgonda District. 4. Ashok Reddy. S/o: and age not known to the Petitioner, Tahsildar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.

5. The Union of lndia, rep.by under Secretary, tvlinistry of Postal Services, New Delhi.

6. The Postal Superintendent, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda., - 7. Raghunanda Swamy, S/o: and age not known to the Petitioner, Postal Superintendent, of Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the Writ of Mandamus to direct the respcndents not to demolish the Petitioners houses in Plot Nos. 21 ,18,39,40,37,38,41 ,42,35,32,25,33,36,19,20,22,23,24,31,30, 130, 129,26, I a'' 3 27,28,29, and 34 respectively in Sy.No.636, [t/amillagudem, Nalgonda Town and district without following the due process of law by declaring the action of the 3rd and 6th respondents( 4th and. Tth respondent in individual capacity ) in demolishing the Petitioners houses as illegal l.A. NO: 3 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 17946 OF 2015) Petition under Section '15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish the Petitioners houses in Plot Nos. 21 ,18,39,40,37,38,41 ,42, 35,32, 25,33,36,19,20,22, 23, 24,31 ,30, 130, 129, 26, 27,28,29, and 34 respectively in Sy.No.636, Mamillagudem, Nalgonda Town and distrrct in Sy.No.636, Nalgonda- town and district without following the due process of law l.A. NO: I OF 201S(WVMP. NO: 2450 OF 2015) Between:

1. The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Departmenl, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 3. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Nalgonda District. .,.PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS AND 1 Chitram Dhanamma, Wo: Srinivas, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Cooli, R/o Plot No.21, Vaggu Nirmala, Wo: Varun Kumar, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Cooli R/o Plot No.'1 B, lt/arupaki Rajitha, Wo: Saidulu, Aged about 43 years, Occ: Cooli R/o Plot No.39, Chitram Swathi, W/o: Satish, Aged about 44 years, Occ: Cooli R/o Plot No.40, Dubba Mamata, Wo: Giri Babu, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Cooli R/o Plot No.37, Perika Parvathamma, Wo ldd:aiah, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Cooli R/o Plot No 38 ljamani Mysamma, Wo: Somaiah, Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.41, Bashapaka Sailaja, W/o: Nagaiah, Aged about 45 years, R/o Plot No.42, Occ: Cooli lVld.Nasreen, Wo: Yousuf, Aged about 43 years, R/o Plot No.35, Occ: Cooli 2 3 4 5 6 7 B o {tl l0.Polepally Kavitha, Wo: Anjaneyulu, Aged about 45 years, R/o Plot No.32, Occ: Cooli . Gunagoni Venkatmma, Wo: Lingaswamy, Aged about 43 years, r/o Plot No.25, 1 '1

12. Polepalli Kondamma, Wo: Laxmaiah, Aged about 49 years, R/o Plot No.33, Occ Cooli

13. Md.Sana, W/o Jaweed, aged about 42 years, R/o Plot No.36. Occ Cooli '14. Ramapovu Sujatha, Wo Thimmappa, Aged aboul 44 years, R/o Plot No.'19, Occ Cooli 15 Gajjerlapudi Sowbhagya Laxmi, Wo Ralu, Aged. about 43 years, R/o Plot No.20, Occ Cooli

16. Kuduthala Chandrakala, Wo Narasimha, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.22, Occ Cooli

17. Mandali Aruna, Wo Srisailam, Aged about 44 years R/o PIot No.!3, Occ Cooli

18.{vagani Laxmamma, Wo Ushaiah, Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No,24, Occ Cooli .19. Raparthy Thyannma, Wo Mallesham, Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.3_1, Occ Cooli

20. Renukuntla [-avannya, W/o Sridhar, Aged about 44 yearc R/o Plot No.30, Occ Cooli 21 .Deepa Shanti, Wo Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 41 years R/o Plot No.130, Occ Cooli

22.Ammi Reddy Kalpana, Wo An.li Reddy, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.129, Occ Cooli

23.Gujalp Geetha. Wo Yadava Reddg Aged aboul 42 years, Rlo Plot No.26, Occ Cooli Z4.Koluru Butchamma, Wo Narasimha Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.27, Qcc Cooli

25. Mareboina Nagamma, Wo Ashok, Aged about 48 years,R/o Plot No.2B, Occ Cooli

26.Mareboina Shoba Rani, Wo Venkat Ramulu, Aged about 46 years, R/o Plqt No.29, Qcc Cooli

27. Mukkamula Kalpana, W/o Naga Raju, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.34 Occ Copli (All are residents of Mammillagudem, Nalgonda town and District) ...PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

28.Ashok Reddy, S/o: and age not known to the Petitioner, Tahsildar, Nalggnda, Nalgonda District.

29.The Union of lndia, rep.by under Secretary, I\/linistry of Postal Services, New Delhi.

30.The Postal Superintendent, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda., -

31. Raghunanda Swamy, S/o: and age not known to the Petitioner, Postal Superintendent, of Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. (- E /z Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased io Vacate the lnterim Stay Passed in WP.No.13676 of 2015 Dated. 01-052015 and dismiss the writ petition ...RESPONDENTS LA. NO: 2 OF 201S(WVMP. N O: 2944 OF 20151 BETWEEN:

1. The Union of India, rep.by under Secretary, Ministry of postal Services, New Delhi:

2. The Postal Superintendent, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. ...RESPONDENTS NO.S and 6 AND No.21, 1 Chitram Dhanamma, Wo: Srinivas, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Cooli, R/o plot 2 YaSgy Nirmala, Wo: Varun Kumar, Aged about 4l years, Occ: Cooli R/o plot 3 tVar-upaki Rajitha, Wo: Saidulu, Aged about 43 years, Occ: Cooli R/o plot No.18, No.39,

4. Chitram Swathi, W/o: Satish, Aged about 44 years, Occ: Cooli R/o plot No.40, 5 Pub-bg Mamata, Wo: Giri Babu, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Cooli R/o plot 6 Perka Parvathamma, Wo ldd:aiah, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Cooli R/o plot No.37, No 38

7. ljamani Mysamma, Wo: Somaiah, Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.4'1, B. Bashapaka Sailaja, Wo: Nagaiah, Aged about 45 years, R/o Plot No.42, Occ: Cooli

9. Md.Nasreen, Wo. Yousuf, Aged about 43 years, R/o Plot No.35, Occ: Cooli 'l0 Polepally Kavitha, Wo: Anjaneyulu, Aged about 45 years, Rio plot No.32, Occ: Cooli

11. Gunagoni Venkatmma, Wo: Lingaswamy, Aged about 43 years, r/o plot No 25, l2.Polepalli Kondamma, Wo: Laxmaiah, Aged about 49 years, R/o plot No.33, Occ Cooli '13. Ramapovu Sujatha, Wo Thimmappa, Aged about 44 years, R/o Plot No.1g, Occ Cooli 14 Gajjerlapudi^Sowbhagya Laxmi, Wo Raju, Aged about 43 years, R/o plot No.20, Occ Cooli r' 0

15. Kuduthala Chandrakala, Wo Narqsimha, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.22, Occ Cooli

16.lVlandali Aruna, Wo Srisailam, Aged about 44 yearc R/o Plot No.23, Occ Cooli lT.Avagani Laxmamma, Wo Ushaiah, Aged about 48 years, R/o PIot No.24, Occ Cooli 'lB.Raparthy Jayamma, Wio lvlallesham, Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.31, Occ Cooli

19. Renukuntla Lavannya, Wo Sridhar, Aged about 44 Yea.s R/o Plot No.30, Occ Cooli

20. Deepa Shanti, Wo Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 41 years R/o Plot No.130' Occ Cooli

21.Ammi Reddy Kalpana, Wo Anji Reddy.Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.129, Occ Cooli

22.Gujala Geelha, Wo Yadava Reddy, Aged about 42 years, R/o Plot No.26, Occ Cooli

23.Koturu Butchamma, Wo Narasimha Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.27, Occ Cooli

24. Mareboina Nagamma, Wo Ashok, Aged about 48 years,Rio Plot No.28, Occ Cooli

25. Mareloina Shoba Rani, Wo Venkat Ramulu, Aged about 46 years, fl/o Plot No.29, Occ Cooli

26.Mukkamula Kalpana, Wo Naga Raju, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.34 Occ Cooli (All are residents of Mammillagudem, Nalgonda town and District) ...PETITIONERS 27. The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

28. The District Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.

29. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Offlce, Nalgonda District.

30.Ashok Reddy, S/o: and age not known to the Petitioner, Tahsildar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda Distrrcl.

31. Raghunanda Swamy, S/o: and age not known to the Petitioner, Postal Superintendent, of Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order daled 11512015 in W.P. No. 13676 of 2015. Counsel for the Petitioners: M/S. SARAMPALLY MRUDULA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE __---7-"' / Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S and 6: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL The Court made the following: ORDER I i i HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.13676 of 2O15 ORDER: This q,rit petition is filed seeking the following prayer: "...to direct the respondents not to demolish the Petitioners houses in PIot Nos.21, 18, 39, 40, 37, 38, 41, 42, 3s, 32, 25, 33, 36, 19, 20, 22, 23,24, 31, 30; 13O, 129, 26,27, 28, 29 and 34 respectiuely in 5g.No.636, Mamillagudem, Nalgonda Toun and distict rtithout follotoing the due process of latu bg declaring the action of the 3rd and 6th respondents 4th and 7th respondent in indiuidual capacity in demolishing the Petitioners houses as illegal"

2. The facts of the case in brief are that petitioners are iabour by occupation and since they had no shelter, made applications for house sites before respondent No.5. Thereafter, respondent No.5 granted house site pattas to an extent of 80 cents during the year 1997 -99 ir-r Sy.No.636, Mamillagudem, Nalgonda town and District. Thereafter, petitioners constructed houses and living in the said residential houses. While So, on 27.O4.2015, respondent authorities approached petitioners and tried to demolish the houses of the petitioners on the ground that subject land was purchased try the Postal Authorities. It is further submitted that in the event of demolition of petitioners' I I i Z houses, petitioners will be put to irreparable loss and damage. Challenging the said action of respondent authorities, the present writ petition is liled.

3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court in similar circumstances in W.P.No.1 1 171 of 2015 dated

20.06.2024 has disposed of the writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 6 therein not to dispossess the petitioners or demolish the structures raised on the subject property, without following the due procedure contemplated under law. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays this Court to pass similar order.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue as well as learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment reports no objection in passing similar orders.

5. In such view of the matter, recording submissions of learned counsel on either side, this Writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent authorities not to dispossess the petitioners or demolish the structures raised on the subject property, without following the due procedure contemplated under law. It is also made clear that the petitioner shall not ) I I carry any further construction without any permission from the competent authorities.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand dismissed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.P. PADMANABHA REDDY EPU TY REGIS SI'CTION OFFICER To, I 2 3 4 E 6 7 oI TJ BS The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department' Secretariat Buildings' ?ilS"Jfllfi 3i c ollector, Nalsonda. Nalsond a District' ii-iE i;;;ii;r-,. iin.itoar drrice Nalsonda Pistrict . - The under Secretary, " ", p ":i l j:rlTl ; il,?H",jlj : R.','lSl,) fl"t80ti . - ff : 33 Ji" %i?3 lil?3'll I: iliri"i ;;* r"' t'h;' 5i'te 3r re ra n g a na' at B#"6t?S E?%'io, praveen Kumar Deputy Solicitor General of lndia[oPUCl Two CD CoPies i"ti""'"ijtJL' rt'rinitt'v of Postal Services' New ?fr5 b 'n" p r w- I I HIGH COURT DATED:1610412025 ORDER WP.No.13676 of 2015 /'7t"$ x 1tr I- S l.-. a- 3 0 APn 2025 '')r. DEr;pATc t,, .a+ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS q

lT.Mandali Aruna, Wo Srisailam, Aged about 44 yea-s Rlo Plot No.23, Occ Cooli I ,.L lB.Avagani Laxmamma, Wo Ushaiah, Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No-24, Occ Cooli l9.Raparthy Thyannma, Wo lVlallesham, A.ged about 48 years, R/o PIot No.31, Occ Cooli

20. Renukuntla [-avannya, Wo Sridhar, Aged about 44 years R/o Plot No.30, Occ Cooli

21.Deepa Shanti, Wo Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 41 years R/o Plot No.130, Occ Cooli

22.Ammi Reddy Kalpana, Wo Anji Reddy, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.129, Occ Cooli

23. Gujala Geetha, Wo Yadava Reddy, Aged about 42 years, R/o Plot No.26, Occ Cooli

24. Koturu Butchamma, Wo Narasimha Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.27, Occ Cooli

25.Mareboina Nagamma, Wo Ashok, Aged about 48 years,R/o PIot No.28, Occ Cooli

26.Mareboina Shoba Rani, Wo Venkat Ramulu, Aged about 46 years, R/o Plot No.29, Occ Cooli 2T.Mukkamula Kalpana, Wo Naga Raju, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.34 Occ Cooli (All are residents of Mammillagudem, Nalgonda town and District) ...PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. The District Oollector. Nalgonda. Nalgonda District. 2 3. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Nalgonda District. 4. Ashok Reddy. S/o: and age not known to the Petitioner, Tahsildar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.

5. The Union of lndia, rep.by under Secretary, tvlinistry of Postal Services, New Delhi.

6. The Postal Superintendent, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda., - 7. Raghunanda Swamy, S/o: and age not known to the Petitioner, Postal Superintendent, of Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the Writ of Mandamus to direct the respcndents not to demolish the Petitioners houses in Plot Nos. 21 ,18,39,40,37,38,41 ,42,35,32,25,33,36,19,20,22,23,24,31,30, 130, 129,26, I a'' 3 27,28,29, and 34 respectively in Sy.No.636, [t/amillagudem, Nalgonda Town and district without following the due process of law by declaring the action of the 3rd and 6th respondents( 4th and. Tth respondent in individual capacity ) in demolishing the Petitioners houses as illegal l.A. NO: 3 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 17946 OF 2015) Petition under Section '15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish the Petitioners houses in Plot Nos. 21 ,18,39,40,37,38,41 ,42, 35,32, 25,33,36,19,20,22, 23, 24,31 ,30, 130, 129, 26, 27,28,29, and 34 respectively in Sy.No.636, Mamillagudem, Nalgonda Town and distrrct in Sy.No.636, Nalgonda- town and district without following the due process of law l.A. NO: I OF 201S(WVMP. NO: 2450 OF 2015) Between:

1. The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Departmenl, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 3. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Nalgonda District. .,.PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS AND 1 Chitram Dhanamma, Wo: Srinivas, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Cooli, R/o Plot No.21, Vaggu Nirmala, Wo: Varun Kumar, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Cooli R/o Plot No.'1 B, lt/arupaki Rajitha, Wo: Saidulu, Aged about 43 years, Occ: Cooli R/o Plot No.39, Chitram Swathi, W/o: Satish, Aged about 44 years, Occ: Cooli R/o Plot No.40, Dubba Mamata, Wo: Giri Babu, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Cooli R/o Plot No.37, Perika Parvathamma, Wo ldd:aiah, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Cooli R/o Plot No 38 ljamani Mysamma, Wo: Somaiah, Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.41, Bashapaka Sailaja, W/o: Nagaiah, Aged about 45 years, R/o Plot No.42, Occ: Cooli lVld.Nasreen, Wo: Yousuf, Aged about 43 years, R/o Plot No.35, Occ: Cooli 2 3 4 5 6 7 B o {tl l0.Polepally Kavitha, Wo: Anjaneyulu, Aged about 45 years, R/o Plot No.32, Occ: Cooli . Gunagoni Venkatmma, Wo: Lingaswamy, Aged about 43 years, r/o Plot No.25, 1 '1

12. Polepalli Kondamma, Wo: Laxmaiah, Aged about 49 years, R/o Plot No.33, Occ Cooli

13. Md.Sana, W/o Jaweed, aged about 42 years, R/o Plot No.36. Occ Cooli '14. Ramapovu Sujatha, Wo Thimmappa, Aged aboul 44 years, R/o Plot No.'19, Occ Cooli 15 Gajjerlapudi Sowbhagya Laxmi, Wo Ralu, Aged. about 43 years, R/o Plot No.20, Occ Cooli

16. Kuduthala Chandrakala, Wo Narasimha, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.22, Occ Cooli

17. Mandali Aruna, Wo Srisailam, Aged about 44 years R/o PIot No.!3, Occ Cooli

18.{vagani Laxmamma, Wo Ushaiah, Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No,24, Occ Cooli .19. Raparthy Thyannma, Wo Mallesham, Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.3_1, Occ Cooli

20. Renukuntla [-avannya, W/o Sridhar, Aged about 44 yearc R/o Plot No.30, Occ Cooli 21 .Deepa Shanti, Wo Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 41 years R/o Plot No.130, Occ Cooli

22.Ammi Reddy Kalpana, Wo An.li Reddy, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.129, Occ Cooli

23.Gujalp Geetha. Wo Yadava Reddg Aged aboul 42 years, Rlo Plot No.26, Occ Cooli Z4.Koluru Butchamma, Wo Narasimha Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.27, Qcc Cooli

25. Mareboina Nagamma, Wo Ashok, Aged about 48 years,R/o Plot No.2B, Occ Cooli

26.Mareboina Shoba Rani, Wo Venkat Ramulu, Aged about 46 years, R/o Plqt No.29, Qcc Cooli

27. Mukkamula Kalpana, W/o Naga Raju, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.34 Occ Copli (All are residents of Mammillagudem, Nalgonda town and District) ...PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

28.Ashok Reddy, S/o: and age not known to the Petitioner, Tahsildar, Nalggnda, Nalgonda District.

29.The Union of lndia, rep.by under Secretary, I\/linistry of Postal Services, New Delhi.

30.The Postal Superintendent, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda., -

31. Raghunanda Swamy, S/o: and age not known to the Petitioner, Postal Superintendent, of Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. (- E /z Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased io Vacate the lnterim Stay Passed in WP.No.13676 of 2015 Dated. 01-052015 and dismiss the writ petition ...RESPONDENTS LA. NO: 2 OF 201S(WVMP. N O: 2944 OF 20151 BETWEEN:

1. The Union of India, rep.by under Secretary, Ministry of postal Services, New Delhi:

2. The Postal Superintendent, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. ...RESPONDENTS NO.S and 6 AND No.21, 1 Chitram Dhanamma, Wo: Srinivas, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Cooli, R/o plot 2 YaSgy Nirmala, Wo: Varun Kumar, Aged about 4l years, Occ: Cooli R/o plot 3 tVar-upaki Rajitha, Wo: Saidulu, Aged about 43 years, Occ: Cooli R/o plot No.18, No.39,

4. Chitram Swathi, W/o: Satish, Aged about 44 years, Occ: Cooli R/o plot No.40, 5 Pub-bg Mamata, Wo: Giri Babu, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Cooli R/o plot 6 Perka Parvathamma, Wo ldd:aiah, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Cooli R/o plot No.37, No 38

7. ljamani Mysamma, Wo: Somaiah, Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.4'1, B. Bashapaka Sailaja, Wo: Nagaiah, Aged about 45 years, R/o Plot No.42, Occ: Cooli

9. Md.Nasreen, Wo. Yousuf, Aged about 43 years, R/o Plot No.35, Occ: Cooli 'l0 Polepally Kavitha, Wo: Anjaneyulu, Aged about 45 years, Rio plot No.32, Occ: Cooli

11. Gunagoni Venkatmma, Wo: Lingaswamy, Aged about 43 years, r/o plot No 25, l2.Polepalli Kondamma, Wo: Laxmaiah, Aged about 49 years, R/o plot No.33, Occ Cooli '13. Ramapovu Sujatha, Wo Thimmappa, Aged about 44 years, R/o Plot No.1g, Occ Cooli 14 Gajjerlapudi^Sowbhagya Laxmi, Wo Raju, Aged about 43 years, R/o plot No.20, Occ Cooli r' 0

15. Kuduthala Chandrakala, Wo Narqsimha, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.22, Occ Cooli

16.lVlandali Aruna, Wo Srisailam, Aged about 44 yearc R/o Plot No.23, Occ Cooli lT.Avagani Laxmamma, Wo Ushaiah, Aged about 48 years, R/o PIot No.24, Occ Cooli 'lB.Raparthy Jayamma, Wio lvlallesham, Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.31, Occ Cooli

19. Renukuntla Lavannya, Wo Sridhar, Aged about 44 Yea.s R/o Plot No.30, Occ Cooli

20. Deepa Shanti, Wo Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 41 years R/o Plot No.130' Occ Cooli

21.Ammi Reddy Kalpana, Wo Anji Reddy.Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.129, Occ Cooli

22.Gujala Geelha, Wo Yadava Reddy, Aged about 42 years, R/o Plot No.26, Occ Cooli

23.Koturu Butchamma, Wo Narasimha Aged about 48 years, R/o Plot No.27, Occ Cooli

24. Mareboina Nagamma, Wo Ashok, Aged about 48 years,Rio Plot No.28, Occ Cooli

25. Mareloina Shoba Rani, Wo Venkat Ramulu, Aged about 46 years, fl/o Plot No.29, Occ Cooli

26.Mukkamula Kalpana, Wo Naga Raju, Aged about 43 years R/o Plot No.34 Occ Cooli (All are residents of Mammillagudem, Nalgonda town and District) ...PETITIONERS 27. The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

28. The District Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.

29. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Offlce, Nalgonda District.

30.Ashok Reddy, S/o: and age not known to the Petitioner, Tahsildar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda Distrrcl.

31. Raghunanda Swamy, S/o: and age not known to the Petitioner, Postal Superintendent, of Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order daled 11512015 in W.P. No. 13676 of 2015. Counsel for the Petitioners: M/S. SARAMPALLY MRUDULA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE __---7-"' / Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S and 6: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL The Court made the following: ORDER I i i HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.13676 of 2O15 ORDER: This q,rit petition is filed seeking the following prayer: "...to direct the respondents not to demolish the Petitioners houses in PIot Nos.21, 18, 39, 40, 37, 38, 41, 42, 3s, 32, 25, 33, 36, 19, 20, 22, 23,24, 31, 30; 13O, 129, 26,27, 28, 29 and 34 respectiuely in 5g.No.636, Mamillagudem, Nalgonda Toun and distict rtithout follotoing the due process of latu bg declaring the action of the 3rd and 6th respondents 4th and 7th respondent in indiuidual capacity in demolishing the Petitioners houses as illegal"

2. The facts of the case in brief are that petitioners are iabour by occupation and since they had no shelter, made applications for house sites before respondent No.5. Thereafter, respondent No.5 granted house site pattas to an extent of 80 cents during the year 1997 -99 ir-r Sy.No.636, Mamillagudem, Nalgonda town and District. Thereafter, petitioners constructed houses and living in the said residential houses. While So, on 27.O4.2015, respondent authorities approached petitioners and tried to demolish the houses of the petitioners on the ground that subject land was purchased try the Postal Authorities. It is further submitted that in the event of demolition of petitioners' I I i Z houses, petitioners will be put to irreparable loss and damage. Challenging the said action of respondent authorities, the present writ petition is liled.

3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court in similar circumstances in W.P.No.1 1 171 of 2015 dated

20.06.2024 has disposed of the writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 6 therein not to dispossess the petitioners or demolish the structures raised on the subject property, without following the due procedure contemplated under law. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays this Court to pass similar order.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue as well as learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment reports no objection in passing similar orders.

5. In such view of the matter, recording submissions of learned counsel on either side, this Writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent authorities not to dispossess the petitioners or demolish the structures raised on the subject property, without following the due procedure contemplated under law. It is also made clear that the petitioner shall not ) I I carry any further construction without any permission from the competent authorities.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand dismissed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.P. PADMANABHA REDDY EPU TY REGIS SI'CTION OFFICER To, I 2 3 4 E 6 7 oI TJ BS The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department' Secretariat Buildings' ?ilS"Jfllfi 3i c ollector, Nalsonda. Nalsond a District' ii-iE i;;;ii;r-,. iin.itoar drrice Nalsonda Pistrict . - The under Secretary, " ", p ":i l j:rlTl ; il,?H",jlj : R.','lSl,) fl"t80ti . - ff : 33 Ji" %i?3 lil?3'll I: iliri"i ;;* r"' t'h;' 5i'te 3r re ra n g a na' at B#"6t?S E?%'io, praveen Kumar Deputy Solicitor General of lndia[oPUCl Two CD CoPies i"ti""'"ijtJL' rt'rinitt'v of Postal Services' New ?fr5 b 'n" p r w- I I HIGH COURT DATED:1610412025 ORDER WP.No.13676 of 2015 /'7t"$ x 1tr I- S l.-. a- 3 0 APn 2025 '')r. DEr;pATc t,, .a+ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS q

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments