The High Court · 2025

)umstances stated in may be pleased to lpresentation dated C his property in the of Bibinagar Village, of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.V. VENKATA RAVI SANf , .R Counsel for the Respondents: ASST. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER TN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.32O85 of 2O25 Date:10.L22025 Between: BSN Suryanarayana AND The State of Telangana, Rep. b1 its Principal Secretary', Home Department, T.S. Secretariat, Hr.derabad & four others. ... Petitioner ...Respondents ORDER: Hcard Sri P.V.Venkata Ravi Sankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents.

2. This u,rit petition is filed seeking the follor,l'ing relief: "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner's represe;rtation dated 29 I 09 /2025 for providing police protection to the pctitioner and his property to an extent of Ac.1-04 gts in Sy.No.415 RU of Bibinagar Village.'tsibinagar Mtrndal, Bhongir Yadadri District as illegal, arbitrary aud violation of principles of natural justice and i violation ol -Article 14. 2l and 300 A of Co istitution of India ancl consequcntl.\ direct tl-r e re sr ondents to consid er tlrc petitioner's represer[.r ron da ted 29 l09 /2025 to provide police proteci rn to the petitioner ancl hrs propertv in the abovr: :trbject liind an extent ol Ac. I 0:l gts in S-y.No.415 RU ,1 Bibinagar Village, Bibirragar Mandal, Bhongir yad:r,l . District ..,,

3. Brief facts stated in tl'ris *'rit petition are rl at tl-ie pctitioner is a u,orking Chartered Accountant had purcl-ras rd an agricultural land admeasuri.rg Ac. L04 guntas in Su^,cy No. ; i 5 RU situated at Bibinagar Vrllagc and Mandal. The said prop€ -rv u,as registercd before the Sub Regrstrar office. Bibinagar, uide |are Deed No.2121 of 1984, datecl 09.10.1984. Thereafter, the I rritioner made an application before the revenue authorities lor is_. ting pattadar pass book and title deed for the said rand and after : -re verification, the revenue authorrties have issued pattadar pass look and titre deed uide document No.752 of 2OA7. Subsequently. ,ctitioner made an application for issuing of new pattadar pass lr rok and title deed and the reveruc authorities have also issued trr: new book and title deed uide document No.B59 ol 2019, dated l .06.2019 and the petitioner is in peaceful possession of the s: rd land, receiving Rythu Bandhu subsidies frorn the Governmen. of Telangana. The petitioner has lodgecl a complaint on 22.O4.2O. z1 against the real culprits ol M/s Narne Dst:rtes private Limitecl .epresented by its MD Gokul arrcl hrs follo*'crs, *,ho trespassed r. t r petitioner,s land. submitted that the petitioner has sent a representation clated

29.O9.202,5 to respondent No.4, which was subsequently forwarded to respondent No.5 on 24.10.2025. After causing detailed enquin., rlotice darte.l 21 .10.2025 uas issued to the petitioner by r,r,av of registered post on 25.1O.2025, u,herein it is stated in the complaint that the petitioner claimed thc ownership of the land admeasuring Ac.1.04 guntas in Survey No.415 and requested police protection to tl-re pctitioner and his family. It is submiltecl that the petitioner earlier also 1'rad lodged a carlier complaint against M/s Narne Estates on 13.O9.2025. Regarding the same dispute, on 16.09.2025 the representatives of M/s Narne Estates had also filed a complaint claiming orvnership ol the land admeasuring Ac.71.00 guntas in Survey Nos.41 2 to 417 wherein it is stated that they have l'enced the propertl, rvith a precast v,all but the petitioner had entered into their land ar-rd removed a portion of the said wall, erected boundary poles (khadies), and also claimed ownership of the land. It is lurther submittecr that on both the complaints, the police visited the spot and verified the facts and found tl'rat a precast wall had already' beerr ere,cted earlier 6y M / s Narne Estate and no crops were found on the lard, which appeared to be fallow (padava).ln the said circumstances, the petitioner was advised to approach the Revenue Department or the concerned Civil Ccjurt for a proper survey to demarcate the boundaries of the- d Upon receiving but respondent No.5 failed to register anv crime z sarinst tl-re said persons, u,ho ar-c tn,ing to grab the petitiorrr. 's propr:rty in continuous attempts and tlving to kill the petiti, ' Lr:r' rvith deadlv weapons. It is furtl-rer submitted that recently, llr said company Ms/ Narne Estate s Private Limited representat-i,, I have rl[ega_lly trespassed into petitioner's land rvithout any righ t or title on 1 1 rh alrd 12th September, 2025 and also constructed a [ .rundarv rvall at night time o[ l21rr September, 2025 and biccl<,r I the pathwa-1.. Subsequently, the petitioner made another cornplaint on

13.O9.2025 with atl relevant doclrments before r ;spondent No.5 and the respondent authorities have failed to regi i er any criminal case against the said persons and further, responrl tnt No.5 treated the matter as civil in nature and has noL c()l) lucted the site inspection or enquin, on petrtioner's complair It is lurther submitted that petitioner made arrother repr(. entation dated

29.O9.2025 before respondent No.3 by rval, of rc I rstered post for taking necessarn action. Even thereafter, tte respondent authorities have not registered an-v case agarnst t-re real culprits, who have attacked the petitioner. Aggrieved '1t.., tht: same, the present writ petition is filed.

4. Learned Assistant Government pleader for ll: ne tras 1>laced a cop.v of instrucl.ions issued ltv the Station House fficer, Bibinagar Policc Station, Rachakonda Commissioncratt:. rvherein it is

1.'. @,- directions from the concerned authorities, the police u,ould proceed further in accordance with law. As such, the earlier complaints dated 13.09.2025 and 16.09.2025 filed by both the parties were closed as Civil in Nature. The same \\'|as communicated to the petitioner by u'a,v of a letter clated 24. 1O.2O25, as a reply to the petition dated 29.09.2025 filed belore the ACP, Bhongir, by way of registered post. The same \\'as enciosed along with the copy of instructions.

5. Recording the above sr-tbmissions, without expressing any vieu, on the mcrits of the case. since the petitioner's complaint dated 29.O9 ,202 5 is closed as civil in nature, this writ petition is disposed of by granting libert)' to the petiticner to pursue their rernedies as available uuder 1a'ur Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. No costs //TRUE COPY// SD/.K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,4C7 SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Pd. Secretary, Department of Home, The State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

2. The Commissionei of Police, Bhongir Zone, Rachakonda Police Commissionerate, Neredment, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Bhongir Yadadri, Bhongir Yadadri District. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bibinagar Town and Mandal, Bhongir Yadadri District. District.

5. The Station House Officer, Bibinagar Town and Mandal, Bhongir Yadadri 6. One CC to SRI P.V. VENKATA RAVI SANKAR, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 8. Two CD Copies BW BN A HIGH COURT DATED:1011212025 ORDER WP.No.32085 of 2025 ( t ;1t: sIe 6 3 J AN 2l]1I : r--- 7 z $ * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \\ ,rb 1