GaramPelli Rajeshwer x v. Telanoana Secretariat, Hyderabad '
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
opinion or-r the merits of the case this writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, with the above directior.rs this writ petition is disposed of Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/. M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASS STANT REGISTRAR \\. \l S SECTIoN oFFICER T.S.,Hyderabad
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V'SHRAVAN KUMAR WRtT PETITIO N NO: 6880 oF 2015 Between: l.GandamJaganMohanRao's/oLateGopalRao'aged52years'occ 'tn'LiiJlx'3;nsa'w/o'-*t*im;##:y":i'l*;#;TT""^ 3. GaramPelli Rajeshwer x 4. GaremPalli Vimanta, w( are r/o Baniipeta Village "pETlrloNERS AND Telanoana Secretariat, Hyderabad ' 1 The State of Telangana, Rep'by its Prl seczetary' Revenue Department' ' ' r irre Djstrict Collector' Warangal' 5 ih" ioint collector' i. iiiE i;;;iro;;, Narsampet' waransal District' 4- The Revenue Divisic H:i'61fl3:r, Narsampet, waransal District' ...RESP.NDENr. PetitionUnderArticle226oltheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue such appropriate writ' order or direction more so particularly ow in the nature of mandamus decraring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in making attempts to disturb the possession of the petitioners from out of the agricultural land admeasuring Ac'13-00 out of Sy-No 331 of Ban'iipeta village' Narsampeta Mandal' Warangal District' which is private patta land and making attempts to assign the same to third parties treating the same as Government land on the basis of wrong entries made without following the procedure known to law, aSnotonlyarbitraryandillegalbutalsoindeprivationofpetitionersright to life and ProPerty l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 9156 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to disturb the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in respect of the agricultural land admeasuring Ac.13-00 out of Sy.No.331 of Banjipeta village, Narsampeta Mandal, Warangal District, pending dispos'al of the writ petitron by this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. HARI SREEDHAR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI H. RAKESH KUMAR, AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.6880 of 2015
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:- "to declare LIu actiort of tlrc responfunts 2 to 5 in making attempts to disturb the possession if the petitioners from out of the agicultural land admeasuring Ac.13-00 out of Sy N0.331 of Banjipeta piLlage,, Narsampeta Mandnl, Wnrnngnl District, tuhich is priaate patta land and making attentpts to assign tlrc same to third parties treating -the same as Gooernment lani on tLre basis of torong entries made uithout foLloating the procedure knott n to latr', as not only arbitrary1nd tLlegaL but also in depriuation of petitioners right to ltt'e anrl property "
Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, none appeared lor Petitioners I
Upon perusal of the proceeding sheet, it is noticed that this CowttLide interim order dated 77.03.2015 in l.A.No.2 of 2075, directed the respondents not to make any assignments in respect of the agriculhrral land admeasuring Ac.13-00 out of Sy No'331 of Banjipeta village, Narsampeta Mandal, Warangal District, which is in possession of the Petitioners.
Operative part
Sri.H.Rakesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents submits that the respondent authorities would follow due process of law before initiating action on the subject ProPerty. 2 5, Recording the above submissions and without expressing any opinion or-r the merits of the case this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to follow due process as contemplated under law before initiating action on the subject property. \- -1 -
Accordingly, with the above directior.rs this writ petition is disposed of Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/. M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASS STANT REGISTRAR \\. \l S SECTIoN oFFICER T.S.,Hyderabad
The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, 2. The Distric_t C. ollector, Warangal. 3. The Joint Collector, Warangai 4. The Revenue Divisione! Of,Icer, Narsampet, \y',rarangal District. 5. The Tahsildar, Narsampet, Waianoal Didtriit 6. One CC to SRt. HARI SRE_EDHAR, Advocate tOpUCl 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court to.. tf,e Strt" of Telangana at 8. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] @fi M KS HIGH COURT DATED:01 10712025 , ORDER WP.No.6880 of 2015 ,,2,, 1,_ "' I t'. ,,'l) *-.;" --- -- - --1;2/' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \t p
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: opinion or-r the merits of the case this writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.