The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction and more specifically in the nature of mandamus. a. Declare the actions of the Respondents and more particularly Respondent No.4 in calling the Petitioners to Moinabad PS and trying to settle civil disputes with the unofficial respondents under the guise of investigation despite the pendency of multiple civil suits vide OS No.33712023, OS No.338/2023, OS No 47612025 and OS No.78312025 before Honourable Courts at Chevella in respect of land admeasuring Ac. 1'1-31 Guntas in Survey No g1 at Himayatnagar Village, Moinabad [\4andal, RR District as illegal, arbitrary, malafide - and against settled principles of law and the Petitioners r ght guaranteed under Article 14, 21 and 3004 of the constitution and b. Consequently, direct the Official Respondent No.4 not to interfere in the civil disputes between Petitioners and Respondent No.5 and 6 herein IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to the Petitioner herein prays in the interim, to direct Respondent No.4 to not call or summon the Petitioners to the Police Station & interfere with personal life & liberty in respect of land admeasuring Ac.11 - 31 guntas in Sno.91, Himayatagar Village, Moinabad [\ilandal, RR District, pending disposal of the present writ petition, failing which the Petrtroner will suffer irreparable loss and injury Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M. SAI CHANDRA HAAS Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to4: SRI R. LAXMIKAN'|H REDDY, Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5&6: SRI PONNAM ASHOK GOUD AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.31 960 0F 2025 ORDER: This writ Petition is fired under Articre 226 of the constitution of lndia seeking the following relief: ". -,to rssue a Wit, order or direction and more specificatty in the nature of mandamus a) Declare the actions of the Respondents and more pafticularly Respondent No. 4 in catling the petitioners to Moinabad pS and trying to settle civil disputes with the unofficial respondents under the guise of investigation despite the pendency of multiple civil suits vrde OS No 337/2023, OS No. 338/2023, OS No. 476/2025 and OS No. 783/2025 before Honourable Courts at Chevelta in iespect of land admeasuring Ac.11.31 Guntas in Survey No.91 at Himayatnagar Vittage, Moinabad Mandat, R.R. District, as illegal, arbitrary, mala fide and against setfled principles of law and the petitioners rights guaranteed under Afticles 14, 21 and 3004 of the Constitution and b) Consequently direct the Official Respondent No. 4 not to inteiere in the civil disputes between petitioners and respondent Nos. 5 and 6 herein: and c,) Pass such other order or orders

2. Heard [vlr. [/1. Sai Chandra Haas, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. R. Laxmikanth Reddy, rearned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. Ponnam Ashok Goud, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 5 and 6. \- \ --- ---.r! r\ Ilt,/ fi:'.P. No. i/ 960 a[202i

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that respondent No. 4 is interfering in civil disputes at the instance of the un cfficial respondents, despite the pendency of civil suits between the parties. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed seeking appropriate directions.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that the respondents/police authorities, particularly respondent No. 4, have never interfered in the civil disputes of the petitioners as alleged. lt is contended that the allegations made in the writ petition are unfounded. Accordingly, he prays for dismissal of the writ petition.

5. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 and 6 submits that the 5th respondent, being aggrieved by the violation of zrn inlunction order granted by a competent civil court, had submitted a police report. He further contends that by seeking relief in this writ petition, the petitioners are attempting to circumvent the due legal process Flence, he prays for passing appropriate orders.

6. I have perused the material placed on record

7. The contention of the petitioners is that the respondents/police authorities, particularly respondent No.4, have been summoning them to the police station and insisting upon settlement of civil disputes with the \ \ _) NNU LV.P. No. )1960 of 2025 unofficial respondents. Such a pleading, on the face of it, discloses that the dispute is purely civil in nature between the parties

8. Having regard to this aspect, and keeping in view the limited jurisdiction of the police in matters of civil nature, even during the course of criminal proceedings, respondent No. 4 is directed to refrain from interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents and shall not, in any manner, initiate or insist upon settlement of such disputes. However, it is clarified that this order shall not, in any way, affect the legal rights of the unofficial respondents to pursue appropriate remedies in accordance with law. L With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/-A.V.S. PRASAD EPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, T.S-,Hyderabad 2. The Directbr General of Police, The DGP Office, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad 3. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad 4. The Station Housing Officer, Moinabad Police Station. 5. One CC to SRl, M.-SAl CHANDRA HAAS, Advocate IOPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOTUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

7. One CC to SRI PONNAIV ASHOK GOUD, Advocate [OPUC] B. Two CD Copies BIV BS HIGH COURT DATED:2411012025 ,":::::..-_.-- ..,a' - ;:.E S ra ,l:'r- a frr\. ../'. r. I il rcl 20[ \\ i '*. ORDER WP.No.31960 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 3olrcla-r-'