✦ High Court of India · 26 Nov 2025

Chunduru Gopal Rao v. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 26 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
26 Nov 2025
Length
1,009 words

The Tahsildar, Mulugu Ghanpur Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District 4 5. Smt. Kalva Annapurna, W/o. Sri Ram Reddy, Aged 48 years, Occ. House hold, R/o. H.No.2-4212 Gandhinagar Village, Ghanpur mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District

6. Smt. Pendli Sarojana, W/o. Late Raji Reddy Aged 80 years, Occ. household, Rl/o. H No. 2-4212 Gandhinagar Village, Ghanpur mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in contemplating to issue Pattadar Passbooks to the unofficial Respondents 5 and 6 in connection with Petitioner agricultural lands to an extent of Ac.14.O2 gts in Sy No.1 of Karkapally Village, Mulugu Ghanpur mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District without issuing any notice and without following due process of law and without considering the representation dated 16.12.2023 of the petitioner and also without considering the stay order passed in Appeal Suit in t.A. No.21112023 in A.S No. 03 ol 2023 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge , Bhupalpally suspending the effect and operation of Judgement and decr >e in O.S. No. 266 of 2022 (OS No 86 of 1984(old)), dated '14.07.2023 as illega, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also in violation of Articl: ; 14, 19, 21 and 300- A of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the resp, ndents 2 to 4 not to issue Pattadar Passbooks and title deeds to the unofficial Ilespondents 5 and 6 and consider the representation dated 16.12.2023 of the 1> titioner and also the interim order passed in appeal suit in l.A. No. 21112023 in I S No. 03 of 2023, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the c r ;umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court m;r 'be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 not to issue Pattadar Passbooks anc title deeds in favour of the unofficial respondents 5 and 6 in connection with the p :titioners agricultural lands to an extent of 4c.14.02 gts in Sy No.'l of Karkel ally Village, Mulugu Qhanpur mandal, jayashankar Bhupalpally District t t considering the representation daled 16.12.2023 of the petitioner and alsc :onsidering the stay order passed in appeal suit in LA. No. 21112023 in AS No i) of 2023 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bhupalpally, per Jing disposal of the main writ petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Between:

1. Smt. Kalva Annapurna, W/o. Sri Ram Reddy, Aged .[ i years, Occ. House hold, R/o. H.No.2-4212 Gandhinagar Village, Ghanpur randal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District

2. Smt. Pendli Sarojana, Wo. Late Raji Reddy Aged 80 !( ars, Occ. household, Rl/o. H No. 2-4212 Gandhinagar Village, Ghanpur r andal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District. AND 1 2 Chunduru Qopal Rao, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, eled 72 years Occ. agriculture, Rl/o. Buddaram village Ghanpur Taluq, Muh:; t, Warangal District The State of Telangana, rep by its Principle Secretary, levenue Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad ...PETITIONERS

3. The District Collector, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District at Bhupalpally 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhupalpally, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District 5. The Tahsildar, Mulugu Ghanpur Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may !e pleased to vacate the interim order dated 21 .12.2023 in WP.No.34320 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DEEPAK MISRA Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5 & 6: Ms. MADHAVI PRIYA MANTENA The Court made the following: ORDER , 4,i-Gs1rri. - !r.<-r! i**j"r#diti.*5if, f <r,r.-., .+-*j--;+-.:)+? -:- ?--.;-+i:.';:: .- .i.;-:-. ---r.--? // i THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VE\ UGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.34320 of 2021 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for consideratic r, Mr. Deepak Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ( luse in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and ;eeks to pass appropriate orders.

2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader lor I.,.r r, enue has not opposed the said submission.

3. Recording the submission of leamed counsel f c - the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader lor Rer t nue. this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be ro order as to costs. To, Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stirr d closed ,TRUE COPY// SD/.C. DEEPIKA ASIi STANT REGISTRAR U SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRI DEEPAK MISRA, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Ms. MADHAVI PRIYA MANTENA, Advocate OPUCI 3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the I tate of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies M BSR H1GH COURT DATED:2611112025 ORDER WP.No.34320 of 2023 ,.rr,11€qi4a:!'r{:?{q,,::.; WITHOUT COSTS {F..r..+- ,-. 4.. ! .1 t STAJ' o (_) {l 5 ilN u13 ,.: J 7 rl: S:f'; -t+ r'6{:..;ii'1. t .. i. ....r: ,r .;'t\!'4inYi4. , : ,..::,: : !{*ry{*f-.. .J,," ". e.$x{e*l' -.i+{ a.lttttt . . , ..:,1',1'. ! r':r'... .. : .r.!!.r'r;-.j_t! ,, "rfr.@rjffir, * ,,': -, . DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION -. .*tgg$x*-:++ihi;* i :,!,:.. ; AS INE&UCTUOUS, :{ t t r-! ;-i3ai1rat&i , .i:.1 ': i ilii't i ti-i, r --i.{;;:. .: .- -.i'rI.- --,!,'-. n .<{-di,.*iin^ -. .rydtrr4ii{tft ; t n:.|{,.,:r, - -..: : r

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments