The High Court · 2025

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad Through SHO, Narsingi PS, Cyberabad

2. P. Jaipal Reddy, S/o. P. Narasimha Reddy, Age. 50 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Plot No. 84, Phase 01, FCI Colony, Vanasthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500070 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memdrandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash all further proceedings in respect of Cr. No. 122212025 on the file of Narsingi Police Station against the petitioner in the interests of Justice. l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition uhder Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings against the petitioner in Cr.No. 122212025 on the file of Narsingi Police Station. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: l, .fajpal Reddy, S/o. P. Narasimha Reddy, Age. 50 years, Ccc: Business, Rt/o. Plot No.8{.-flase 01, FCI Cotony, Vanast6alipuram, F:nga Reddy Di'strict, Telangana-500070 AND ...PETITIONER/DE FA() TO COMPLAINANT 1 2 T.he State gf Telangana, Rep. by its public prose :utor, High Court, Hyderabad Through SHO, Narsingi pS, Cyberabad P, Y"tuJ Reddy, S/o, Madhav Reddy, Age: 44 years, ( )cc: Vice president, Sloka Schools, R/o. Flat No.8201, SkyifitGated Comrnrnity, euppaiagudJ, Naringi, Ranga Reddy District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 359 (6) of the BNSS, pr rying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of cr minal petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to con t ound the offences under Sections 316(4), 318(4), 35i (2) of BNS in pursua I :e of the Cr. No. 122212025 on the file of Narsingi police Station. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Between: !, .]alpal Reddy, S/o. P \qr.aslmha Reddy, Age. 50 years, r)cc: Business, Fl./o. Plot No. B!-f|gse 01, FCt Colony, Vanast6atipurdm, Rir ga neOOV Oi'sirict, Telangana-500070 AND ...PETITIONER/DE FACI O COMPLAINANT 1 2 The State 9f Telangana,. Rgp by its public prosr:r utor, High Court, Hyderabad Through SHO, Narsingi pS, Cyberabad P, Yut"J Reddy,. S/o, M.adhqv Reddy, Age: 44 years, (l rc: Vice president, Sloka Schools, Rl/o. Flat No. 8201, Skyilla Gated Comnt nity, puppalaguda, Naringi, Ranga Reddy District Petition under Section 359 (2) of the BNSS, prz ying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of cri ninal petition, the ...RESPONDENTS High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and consequenfly quash the proceedings in Cr. No. 122212025 on the file of Narsingi police Station. This petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Singireddi sridhar' Advocate for the petitioner in crr.petition and Respondent No.2 in i a Nos 3 and 4 0f 2025 and the pubric prosecutor for the state of rerangana on beharf of the Respondent No.'1 in crl.petition and l.A.Nos.3 and 4 0f 2025 and of sri s K s Kiran' Advocate for the Respondent No.2 in crr.petition and petitioner in l.A.Nos. 3 and 4 of 2O2S The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE J. SREE]{ ]/AS RAO I.A.Nos.3 ar.d 4 of 202s IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.13729 of 2(2s Between: B. Venkat Reddy AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Fublic Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad, Through SHO, Narsingi pS, Cyberabad and another r:titioner/accused . . Respondents : COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been frled by the t> rtitioner/ accused seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No. j 222 of 2O2S of Narsingi Poiice Station, Cyberabad, registered for t l- : offences under Sections 316(4), 3I8(4) and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyrra Sanhita,2023 (for short,'BNS).

2. Mr. Sridhar, learned counsel for the petitiont r , and Mr. S.K.S. Kiran, learned counsel for respondent No.2, submitt r I that during the pendency of the present Criminal petition, at the ins [ance of the well wishers, relatives and eiders, the parties have settlc: the dispute and entereri compromise and filed Memorandum o I Understanding. Accordingly, respondent No.2 l-rled I.A.Nos.3 and 4 :'2O25 to perrnit 2 \, \ them to comPound the offences and to record the compromise entered between them resPectivelY' 3. This Court uide order, dated 17'11'2025' directed the pafiies i.e., the petitioner and respondent No'2' to appear before the High Court Legal Services Committee' Hyderabad' on or before 25. 11.2025. In compliance of the said order' the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee' has submitted report, dated 25.11'2025, stating that the petitioner and respondent No.2 were duly identified with copies of their Aadhar Cards. " it is further stated that the parties have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise' 4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No'2 has not opposed the same' 5. The parties herein have filed Memorandum of Understanding along with I'A'No'4 of 2025' The said Memorandum of Understanding and the report of the Secretary' Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee' Hyderabad' are placed on record. In view of the said report and also in view of the 6. compromise entered between the petitioner and respondent No'2 made bY the resPective Parties, as well aszthe submissions /a 3 I : t.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed' Cons squently' the proceedings in Crime No.l222 of 2025 of Narsingi Police Station' Cyberabad, are hereby quashed against the petitiol-r :r'

7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed' sut iect to payment ofcosts of Rs.10,00O/- (Rupees ten thousand only) by he petitioner to the High Court kgal Services Committee, within te:-r (10) days from todaY. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any' sha I stand closed' SD/. AHMI: ) ABDULLA KHAN ASSIS TANT REGISTRAR .a |y / iECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// The Xlll Judicial First Class ttrlagistrate Cyberabad at Ra'< ndranagar. The Station House Officer, Narsingi Police Station, Cyber rbad Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High court for the stal( of Telangana, at Hvderabad [OUT] Ohe CC to SRl. Singireddi Sridhar, Advocate IOPUCI One CC to SRl. S.K.S.KlRAN, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies 1 2 J 4 5 o \ To d PR (Enclosing a coPY of joint memo) Note: Total AmountofRs. 10,000t ( Rupees Ten thousand orl')has been paid by Sri S.Sridhar, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hor ble Court vide order dated 02.12.2025 as Rs. 10,0OO/. ( Rupees Ten thousand on I ) to the High Court Legal Services Committe, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 143034 of 2025 dated 10.12.2025.

1. I *68aS .,-:.. { # HIGH COURT DATED: 0211212025 i I l COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos. 3 AND 4 OF 2O2S IN/AND GRLP.No.13729 of 2025 riE ,3 I, /-- '-n' z --i! iJ (j I * Or ALLOWING THE CRL.PETITION AND l.A.NOs 3 AND 4 9 \ ,t* HrcH cou Rr o t (rorN] YE'TA.?E oF TELAN.ANA ol-o[J#*^u o, l) t'A'No'"l of 2025 crl'P'No' of 2o25 ljTat grr\)uerN' I B. Venkat ReddY' . 5/o. Madhav ReddY' H* f":[r{',tl: il?ff"'*::; e'm mu n i'[Y 'puooala'guda,Narrngr' Ranla ReddY Distria ' And . .. Petitioner / Accused ' Hvderabad il:jillts;'fi i,*tr;[2[:'ffi'J* 'f;,i,ijijffffi- Rep.nden itted that the Petitioner herein filed 1222/2025 on the file of Narsing the above case against the Petitioner' l) lt is subm to quash Cr' No. No.2 has lodged and the matter is under investigation' the above Quash Petition seeking i Policer Station' The RgsPondent who was figured as Accused at the interv of the ProceedinSs' a conclusion to sefile the disP on r 2) During the PendencY wishers' we have come to Hon'ble Courts including the above Cr' Station. In furtherance of the settlem No.1222/2025 ent. we have execu (MoU) dated 1g'O9'2O2 5. wherein we have rehensivelY' As such we have filed a Petition The content menti oned in omPromise' Understanding disputes comP to record the C ention of elders and wel[- before thl utes Pending he fite of Narsingi Police ted a Memorandum settled all our claims and seeking the Hon'ble Court romise Petition is e said Co true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief. Th, said compromise is entered with free will and consent and without any undue inll rence from any one. Hence, we are filing the present joint memo. N\,/ \J.4 14.'rlnthta Reddy ) (F. Jaipa e Hence this joint memo Hyderabad, 05.10.2025 $ =.\ Counsel for Petitioner Counsel for Respondent No.2