High Court · 2025

Petition under Artrcle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly .one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the respondent No.2 to 5 in not to considering the petitioner representation dt.13.1O.2025 to stop the mutating the names of respondent No. 6 and 7 with regard to the petitioner's bearing Survey No.86/es/2/3, measuring 4.00 acres, situated at Degama Village, Bazarhathnoor t ! Mandal, Adirabad District is ilegar, arbitrary, and in vioratil r Articre 300-4 of the constitution of India and consequenry direct the rest lndent No.2 not to entertain any arien atio n/registra tion with regard to petition€ r s bearing survey No. 86l*1213, measuring 4.00 acres, situated at Degama \/ lage. Bazarhathnoor Mandal, Adilabad District till the disposal of writ petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section i 51 CpC praying that in the ;ircumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of the petition, the High Co I t may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to 5 not to entertain any arieri tion/registration with regard to petittoner,s bearing Survey No. g6teJll2l3, m: tsuring 4.00 acres, situated at Degama virage, Bazarhathnoor Mandar, Adirz l ad District, pending disposal of writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI RAGAM VISHAL Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 5: SRI L.RAVINDER, L( ip FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PBTITION No.3 19o6 of 20125 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to S in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated I3.1O.2O25, requesting to stop mutation of the names of respondent Nos.6 and 7 witln regard to the petitioner,s land to an extent of Acs.4.OO guntas in Sy.No.B6 /Al2/3, situated at Degama Village, Bazarhatnoor Mandal, Adilabad District (hereinafter referred to as the ..subject property"), as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India, and conseguently, to direct the respondent No.2 not to entertain any alienation or registration with regard to the subject property till the disposal of the writ petition.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner ald Sri L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue Y 2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner subrr its that the petitioner is the absolute owner ald posse isor of the subject lald, having inherited the same from }L's ancestors The name of the petitioner has been entered irr the revenue records, ald a digital Pattadar Passbook rearing No T13030160122, vide Khata No.317, was also i ,sued in his favour. Since then, the petitioner has been in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same. 4 . While things stood thus, learned co ur sel for the petitioner submits that respondent Nos.6 anrl 7, who are strangers to the property, made an applicatir,r L before the 5th respondent on 07.08.2O25 for mutation o1 .heir names in the revenue records on the basis of a str la bainama purportedly executed by the petitioner. He subr petitioner has no relationship with . responder rits that the I ts6andT and has never executed the said sada bainam-; He further submits that, based on fabricated documents. espondents 6 and 7 are attempting to incorporate their rL Lmes in the revenue records. Aggrieved by such action, ti e petitioner mhde a representation before the 2"d res,1 ondent on I L J

13.1O.2025. He further submits that the petitioner has a_lso filed a suit for perpetual injunction before the Special Deputy Collector, ITDA, p.O. Utnoor, Adilabad District, against respondents 6 and T, in which they have already entered their uakala| and the said suit is pending consideration. The petitioner contends that there is every likelihood of respondents 6 and 7 succeeding in incorporating their names in the revenue records based on the fabricated sada bainama. Despite receipt and acknow,ledgment of his representation dated 13.10.2025 by the 2nd respondent, no action has been taken till date. Hence, the petitioner seeks appropriate directions from this Court.

5. On the other hald, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, upon instructions, submits that the petitioner has not furnished details regarding the pending suit before the Special Deputy Collector, which he claims to have fiied against the unofhcia-l respondents. He further submits that before taking arry action, the official respondents will follow the due process of law. He also !- \*- mere.ly already 4 submits that the petitioner approachec this Court on apprehension, at a Premature st.l e. Having approached the petition is both competent forum, filir r , the present rvrit premature artd misco I :eived. Hence, he seeks dismissal of the same. 6 artd the learned Revenue, arld after Court, withou t making any observations rn the case, is of the submitted a Having heard the learned counsel lor the petitioner Governn I .nt pieader for Assi s tan t examining the mater i I on record, this mertts or demerits of the oprniorr that since the petitioner has represi( ntation dated 13.10.2025 before ttl6 2na resPondent/Ir strict Collector, and in view of the submission made ly the learned Assistant Government pleader for Rev: rue that due process of law will be follou.ed before takinl any the said represen tal iolr, there are no grour r [s to this writ petition. aclion on en tertain 7 . However, the ),,I respondent is directr J the petitioner,s represerntation dated l3. lO.,_l )2 aPProPriate orders as r :xpeditiously as possrt Ie f a to cotrsider 5 and pass , strictly in ,/_. r ) accordance with law, after giving due notice to the petitioner, as well as to the unofficial respondents 6 and 7 ' and all other concerned parties. B. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand dismissed. SD/ //TRUE COPY// To, 1 One CC to SRI RAGAM VISHAL' Advocate [OPUC] 2 Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE' High Court for the Hyderabad [OUT] 3 BSR GJP Two CD CoPies a . PONNA KRISHNA ANT REGIS CTION OFFICER ate of Telangana at HIGH COURT DATED: 2411012025 ) ORDER WP.No.31906 of 2025 'lI ti; ?W DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS I '){ o