One CC to SRl v. BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY

1- The state oj r..g.r.anga13,.rep,by.its principar secretary to Home Department, 2' The Commissioner-oi potice, cvGrabad at Gachibgw!!, Rangareddy District. 3. The Deputv commissioner' or porrc",-cvoiiJoio, *6;i;nii", Division, 4' The Assistant Commissioner of Police, cyberaoad, Rajendranagar Division, Rangareddy District 5' orricer, Rajendranasar Potice station, Rajendran asar, ffir:135:? #3,Y,:? 6' The state- of Telangana, rep-by its Principal secretary to Municipalr fli#ffit:flon and Urban'oevelopm"nt b66lhmeni,- Sei?eiari"t eritdinfis, 7. The commissioner, Govt. of relangana, Endowments Dept., Boggulakunta, HYderabad L The Deputy commissioner, state of Tetangana, Endowments Dept., 9. The Ast. commissioner, state of rerangana, Endowments Dept., Rangareddy Rangareddy District 'rs sePl'' rJr..r District RR 6to9 are impleaded as per c.o. dt. 14-3-11in wpMp 97g0 ot 1t ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order more particularly one'in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in not providing police protection for construction of compound wall surrounded by petitioner Muth lands in survey No.242 (old), new survey Nos.338, 33g, 340,341,342,343 and 344 t j : i i I i I I i j I t i ii': i ! : admeasuring Ac.16.32 guntas situated at Attapur village, Rajendrangar mandal; Rangareddy District inspite of the permission accorded by the Endowments Department, Telangana State:vide proceedings RC.No .Ct3088t2014 dated 8-1- 2015 and atso the petitioner representation dated 25-1-2017 and atso not initiating any criminal action against the tand grabbers namely i.e., 1) M.Sudhakar Reddy S/o.M.Dasarath Reddy, R/o.H.No.1-9-54, Huda Colony, Attapur, Rajendranagar, Rangareddy District and 2) Ram Reddy or Gudumba Ramreddy S/o.Achireddy, Occ-TRS Party local leader, R/o.Attapur, Rajendranagar mandal, Rangareddy District and other associates of M.Sudhakar Reddy i.e., Pawbn Kumar Sony, Arun Kumar Sony, Ghanshyam sony and also their associates as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and also against Article 300 A of Constitution of lndia and consequential directions to the respondents to provide police protection to the petitioner Muth and its constructional activity of the construction of compound wall surrounded by the petitioner muth properties i.e., sun/ey No.242 (old), new survey Nos.338, 339, 340,341,342,343 and 344 admeasuring Ac.16.32 guntas situated at Attapur village, Rajendrangar mandal, Rangareddy District by restraining the following persons and their illegal activities i.e., 1) tv!.Sudhakar Reddy S/o.M.Dasarath Reddy, R/o.H.No.1-g-54, Huda Colony, Attapur, Rajendranagar, Rangareddy District and 2) Ram Reddy or Gudumba Ramreddy S/o.Achireddy, Occ-TRS Party local leader, R/o.Attapur, Rajendranagar mandal, Rangareddy District and other associates of M.Sudhakar Reddy i.e., Pawan Kumar Sony, Arun KumarSony, Ghanshyam sony and also their associates who are making illegal tridls to grab the petitioner muth properties i.e., old Saibaba mandir locates in petitioner muth lands for their illegal means forthwith a. 4822 0F Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated - in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Fligh-Court-may be pleased to direct the respondents to provide police protection to the petitioner Muth and its constructionat activity of the construction of compound wall surrounded by the petitioner muth properties i.e., survey No.242 (old), new survey Nos.338, 339, 340,341,342,343 and 344 admeasuring Ac.16.32 guntas situated at Attapur village, Rajendrangar mandal, Rangareddy District by restraining the following persons and their illegal activities i.e., 1) M.Sudhakar Reddy S/o.M.Dasarath Reddy, R/o.H.No.1-g-54, Huda colony, Attapur, Rajendranagar, Rangareddy District and 2) Ram Reddy @ Gudumba Ramreddy s/o.Achireddy, occ: TRS Party local leader, R/o.Attapur, Rajendranagar mandal, RangareOOy District and other associates of M.Sudhakar Reddy i.e., pawan Kumar Sony, Arun Kumar Sony, Ghanshyam sony and also their associates who are making illegat trials to grab the petitioner muth properties i.e., old Saibaba mandir lbcates in petitioner muth lands for their illegal means forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition . Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. V BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counset for the Respondent Nos. Ttog: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: ORDER q |. t. ' .-.., : '. : r. : - i-:: -i .. : --i l'.: r:..r{44'$i...}, ...L1..;Cgli:r.*.5jE A.n,- ,..:"; i a THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT No. fi27 0F 2(JL7 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed with the follo*ing relief: "...to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents Nos. 2 to 5 in not providing police protection for construction of compound wall surrounded by petitioner Muth lands in survey No-242 (old), new survey Nos.338, 339, 34O, 34I, 342,343 and 344 admeasuring Ac.16.32 guntas situated at Attapur village, Rajendrangar mandal, Rangareddy District inspite of the permission accorded by the Endowments Department, Telangana State vide proceedings RC.No.C/3O8812OL4 dated 08.01.2015 and also the petitioner representation dated 25.OL.2OLT and also not initiating any criminal action against the land grabbers namely i.e., 1) M.Sudhakar Reddy S/o.M-Dasarath Reddy, R/o.H.No.1-9-54, Huda Colony, Attapur, Rajendranagar, Rangareddy District and 2) Ram Reddy @ Gudumba Ramreddy S/o.Achireddy, Occ: TRS Party local leader, R/o.Attapur, Rqjendranagar mandal, Rangareddy District and other associates of M.Sudhakar Reddy i.e., Pawan Kumar Sony, Arrn Kumar Sony, Ghanshyam sony and also their associates as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and also against Article 3OOA of Constitution of India and consequential directions to the respondents to provide police protection to the petitioner Muth and its constructional activity of the construction of compound wall surrounded by the petitioner muth properties i.e., survey No.242 (old), new survey Nos.338, 339, 34O, 341, 342,. 343 and 344 . admeasuring Ac.16.32 guntas situated at Attapur village, Rajendrangar mandal, Rangareddy District by restraining the following persons and their illegal activities i.e., 1) M.Sudhakar Reddy S/o.M.Dasarath Reddy, R/o.H.No. 1-9-54, Huda Colony, Attapur, Rqiendranagar, Rangareddy District and 2) Ram Reddy or Gudumba Ramreddy S/o.Achireddy, Occ- IBS Party loca1 leader, R/o.Attapur, Rajendranagar mandal, Rangareddy District and other associates of M.Sudhakar Reddy i.e., Pawan Kumar Sony, Arun Kumar Sony, Ghanshyam sony and also their associates who are making illegal trials to grab the petitioner muth properties i.e., old Saibaba mandir locates in petitioner a 2 muth lands for their illegal means forthwith and to pass..."

2. Heard Mr.V.Brahmaiatr Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.l to 5.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed away and seeks time to obtain further instructions.

4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that, as per the instmctions received from the Sub-Inspector of Police, Attapur, an enquiry was conducted with the petitioner's son. It was stated that, during the petitioner's lifetime, when he intended to t construct a boundary wall, certain individuals had illega1ly interfered with the constmction, leading to the filing of the present petition. However, the bound.ar5r wall and a gate have since been constmcted, and there h?" been no further interference from those individurt.*tiltreafter. - 3 Accordingly, there is no subsisting issue on the aspect raised in the petition. Hence, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home prays that the writ petition be dismissed.

5. I have perused the material available on record.

6. The written instructions fiIed by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, along with the statement of Mr. Akash Deep Agarwal, the petitioner's son, have been duly considered. Upon examination of the said statement and the record, it is evident that nothing further remains for adjudication in this matter, nor does the case warrant any further direction.

7. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/-A. SRINIVASA REDDY ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, F! tf -GF FoR H6ME ,High Court for the State of Telangana at

1. One CC to SRl. V. BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY, {dvgcate [oPUC] ,. iil C6rio 3. firo-cd" io' cij Fon euooWMENTS, High Court for the State of 4. iwo iC;i; GilFoR Mutttqpnl ADMlNls-rRArloN At{D URBAN 5. Two CD CoPies I'lyderabad IOUTI Telangana, at HYderabad IO-UT]. DEVELOpfvfef.ff-,iligti'Cor,{forthe State of Telangana, atflyderabad [OUTI ... ,_ ^^..-' \ \ t i HIGH COURT DATED i1711112025 1 .$'* +-s u- \ \ .m/ tt4' * ORDER WP.No,4027 of 2017 &c!H * . .*lrir I .{ . DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FRUCTOUS \I