1. Nilam Sathaiah v. 1. The State of Telangana

4. The Tahsildar, Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 5. The Sub Registrar, SRO,lbrahimpatnam,Ranga Reddy District. 6. Neelam Sri Ramulu, S/o Nilam Sathaiah Aged 61 years, Occupation-. Agriculture Rl/o Kurmidda Village, Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONOENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass a writ ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus against the official Respondents action in not considering the representation of the petitioners dated 1410712025 in seeking equal distribution of payment of the land acquisition Ex gatia in taking over the unauthorised occupation land of the petitioners family jointly cultivated is being given to one brother only, the unofficial respondent R-4, instead of equal share given to all the other brothers P2 to P5 also,despite of written ob,ections is totally illegal and unlawful and highly arbitrary apart from violation of the Article 14 and 21 ot Constitution of lndia consequently direct the Respondents to make payments of Ex-gratia at Rs 7.70,000/- per Acre for the unauthorised occupation of the petitioners family jointly cultivated land by all brothers i.e., Petitioners 2 to 5 and the unofficial Respondent R-4 be given equally to each and every of the 6 brothers for the total extent of 6 Acres of their unauthorised occupation land for its acquisition from the Petitioners family members being joint benifisharies of the acquired land situated at S,No 92 of Kurmidda Village of Yacharam Mandal Ranga Reddy District asper the scheme vide No L03l313l20'15-Kurmidda - Yacharam Dated 16- 4-2016 for establishing Green Pharmacity and further direct the official Respondents to allot a plot of 126 Sq Yds ( one Gunta ) for each Acre land be given equally to all the brothers in addition to the Ex -Gratia per each Acre of land acquired and in the event if they are already given to Respondent No-4 then recover the same and redistribute to all brothers equally. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Official Respondents to consider and dispose the representation of the Petitioners daled 1410712025 pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pending disposal of the main writ Petition direct the Official Respondent No 5 not to register the plots registered in the name of the 6 Respondent as being offered by Respondent No 3. Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl D SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents No 1 To 5: K.RADHA REDDY AGP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for the Respondent No 6: -- The Court made the following: ORDER I THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.31888 oF 2025 DER: This Writ Petition is fited with the following relief: "Io ,bsue writ, order or direction, more padicutarly one in the naturc of Writ of mandamus against the official respondents action in not considering the representation of the petitioners daled 14.07.2025 in seeking equal distribution of payment of the land acquisition Ex gratia in taking over the unauthorized occupation land of the petitioners family jointly cultivated is being given to one brother only, the unofficial respondent No.4, instead of equal share given to alt the other brothers P2 to P5 also, despite of written objections is totally illegal and unlav,rfut and highly arbitrary apart from violation of the Afticles 14 and 21 of the Constrtu on of lndia. Consequen y direct the respondents to make payments of Ex- gratia @ Rs 7,70,000/- per acre for the unauthorized occupation of the petitioners family jointly cultivated land by all brothers i.e., petitioners 2 to 5 and the unofficiat respondent No.4 be given equally to each and every of the 6 brothers for the total extent of 6 acres of the unauthorized occupation land for its acquisition from petitioners family members being joint beneficiaries of the acquired land situated at S. 1 i I 2 \ \ No.92 of Kurmidda village of Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as per the scheme vide No.LC3/313/201$Kurmidda - Yacharam dated 16.04.2016 for establishing Green Pharmacity and further direct the official respondents to allot a plot of 126 square yards (one Gunta) for each acre land be given equally to allthe brothers in addition to the ex-graia per each acre of land acquired and in the event if they are already given to respondent No.4 then recover the same and redistribute to all brothers equally

2. Mr. D. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the official respondents have failed to consider his representation dated 14.07.2025, wherein he sought equal distribution of land acquisition ex grataa in respect of the unauthorizedly occupied land taken over from the petitioners' joint family. Hence, the present petition has been filed seeking appropriate directions.

3. Ms. K. Radha Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 5, fairly admits that the petitioner's representation dated ]

14.07.2025 is pending consideration before respondent No.3. She further submits that an appropriate direction may be issued to the J said authority to decide the representation within a stipulated time frame.

4. I have perused the material available on record.

5. Having regard to the grievance of the petitioner and the admitted pendency of the representation dated 14.07.2025 betore respondent No.3, this Court finds it appropriate to direct expeditious adjudication of the same. Accordingly, respondent No.3 is directed to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 14.07.2025 in accordance with law, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and to communicate the decision so taken to the petitioner forthwith.

6. With this direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No All miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petiti on, shall stand closed. SD/. U. SUDHA T REGISTRAR J To, //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER Telangana, Secretariat, ple Secretary, Revenue Dpt, S

1. The The princi Hyderabad. 2. The District Co[ector, Kon ga Kalan, Ranga Redd y District. 3. Revenue D ivision Officer cum Land A lbrahimpat nam, Ranga Redd y Diskict 4. The Tah sildar, Yacharam Mandal, Ra nga Reddy District. 5. The Sub Registrar, SRO, lbrahimpatn am, Ranga Reddy District. 6. One CC RESH KUMAR, Advocate [O PUCI toS RI DSU cquisition Officer, _LAO office of RDO, 7 - Two ccs to Gp FoR LAND ACeursrroN , High court for the state of ^ Telangana at Hyderabad tourl B. Two CD Copies l3'* (F ' rvrr ,r rlv : / j HIGH COURT DATED i2411012025 \ \ ORDER WP.No.31888 of 2025 fLI= i.i i- r. g ji .) ,l:, \ :, :.. 17 Btt &l ;7.,11:: i.-': DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS t\ (A- 1s