The High Court · 2025

2. The State of Telangana,, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court' Hyderabad' through PS, MeerPet, Rachakonda. ..RespondenURespondent in l'A'Nos'1 and 2 ol 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/2nd respondent to compound the offences under Sections. 504, 5OO lPC, Sec. 3(1) (r) and 3 (2) (Va) of SCs/STs (POA) Amendment Act 2015 and quash the proceedings in FlR.No.845 of 2024 of P.S, Meerpet, Rachakonda in S.c.No.159 0f 2025 0n the file of Vll Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-special Judge for Trial of SCs/STs (POA) Court: Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar t.A. NO: 20F 2025 Petition under section 359(2) BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/2nd respondent herein to record the compromise in FlR.No.0.t of 2024 of P.s, Meerpet, Rachakonda in s.c.No.159 oI 2025 on the file of Vll Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-special Judge for trial of SCs/STs (POA) Court: Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar' ThisPetitioncomingonforhearinguponperusingtheMemorandumof GroundsofCriminalPetitionanduponhearingtheargumentsofMsKARLAPUD| ARUNA, Advocat-e for the Petitioner and the sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1, and of sri M Phani Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent No'2' The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos. 1&2of2025 in/and 1 GOMMON ORDER: 1. This criminal Petition is filed under section s2B of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in S.C.No.159 of 2025, pending on the file of Vll Additional District & Sessions Judge cum Special Judge for trial of SCs/STs (POA) Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, registered for the offences punishable under section s04, s06 of lpC, sections 3(1X0 & 3 (2) (Va) of scs/srs (PoA) Amendment Act,

2. lt is subrnitted by learned counsel for the petitioner/accused as well as respondent No.2 that during pendency of the present criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.No.1 & 2 of 2025 have been fited by respondent No.2/defacto complainant seeking permission to compound the offences, to. record compromise and to quash the proceedings against the petitioner in the above crime.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the compromise petition. i!]- i 2 EfD,I t.A.Nos.l &2 oJ2025 in/ond Crlp.No13671 o! 2025

4. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court L.egal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vide orders dated 23.10.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of -[elangana the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 31.10.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion, entered into compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in S.C.No.159 of 2025, pending on the file of Vll Additional District & Sessions Judge cum Special Judge for trial of SCs/STs (POA) Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, are hereby quashed subject to the petitioner paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the High .--.-.--._-..+ ..-_l- 3 EfD,T ,.A.Nos.l&2 of2025 in/ond Crlp.No13671 ol m25 Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry

7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed SD/. A.V.S. PRASAD REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To, W

1. The Metropolitan Sessions Court for Trials of SCs & STs Cases-cum-Vll Additional District & Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, Rangareddy District.

2. The Station House Officer, Meerpet Police Station, Cyberabad. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad IOUTI

4. One CC to Ms KARLAPUDI ARUNA, Advocate IOPUC] 5. One CC to SRI M PHANI KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies (Along with copy of Joint memo is enclosed herewith) Note: Total Amount of Rs.10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Karlapudi Aruna, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 17.11.2025 as Rs.5,0004 (Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "High Court Legal Services Committee, at Hyderabad, Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association High Curt Buildings Hyderabad, and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No.135220 of 2025. NVB/Sa :l f:I HIGH COURT DATED:1711112025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.13671 ol 2025 \! t\: B 3 trt, ?Ui I ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AND l.A.Nos.1 AND 2 OF 2025 1 ? {v 'lh I t 1 I ! I,l, I I t i I i ; i i I I I I i I I I i i I ,l,,( HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAN AT FTYDERABAD of 2025 Between Mokka Narender Kumar @ Nandu'

1. The State of Telangana ReP. bY Public Prosecutor & another .. . Petitioner/Accused " i- ..: _., ,.r; - . | " l-. .a Petitione ThecaseWaSregisteredpgainstthepetitionerfortheoffences : : punishableunderSections'504'506IPC'Sec'3(1)(r)&3(4(Va)of nPlaint filed bY znd SCs/STs (POA) Amendment Act'2015' On a cor respondent hetein u tu'"i in FIR No 01 of 2024 of P's' Meerpet' Rachakonda and char.gesheet,fiied in s.c.No. 159 of 2025 on the file of Hon,ble,VII Additionui oirtri.t &,sessions J udge-cu m-s pl'Judge for tria t of Scs/sTs (poA) courti: Ranga Reddy district at L'B'Nagar' while things !.vr:-.--..:...'j:.:,',.,^. ., stoodthus,the2ndrespondent/complainantandaccusedhavedecided ,,, toresolveallissueswithoutanyconsiderationsorcoercion,and ;uasion of the',u*e complainant want to withdraw his complaintandtheoffencesa.en"n-.ompoundableoffencu'..nnature and therefore the petitioner indulgence of this Hc the proceedings in FIR::No.01 of 2024of P.s, Meerpet, Rachakonda by recording the comPromise deed' K'?)(d)qDfit (Pole Kondal) N,' (Mokka Na ,.ffi'ar@ Nandu) 'I I I ! ! -2- 1 \ \ K.f.Kot.tDN- ,, (fole Kondal) .pr (Mokka Na render mar,@ Nan.dr{) Counsel 1o, 2.d respondent v-, Counsel for petitioner a Date.15- 10-2025