Harishankar S v. The State of Telangana

Shri N. B. Babu SJ. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ. order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of [tlandamus, by declarrng the action of the respondents more particularly Respondent no 3 in not allowing the petitioner to attend the examination to be conducted on october 27 , 2025 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violations of principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to attend the examination on October 27,2025. l.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit frled in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to :rj;-:q!4i_7 direct the responJent no 3 to permit the petitioner to atterrd a crass and to attend the examinatio' o be conducted on october 27 , 2025, trrending finar hearing of the main writ petilion. Counsel for the Fetitioner: SRI V.T.KALYAN Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Gp FOR HIGHER EDL CATTON Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRt M.SRINIVAS REDDy, SC FOR OSMANIA UNIVEITSiTY Counsel for the R-.spondent No.3 : __ The Court made flre following ORDER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI PET TION No.3 1A42 0F 25 ORDER: Heard Sri V.T.Kalyan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Sri Malipeddi Srinivas Reddy' learned StandingCounselforOsmaniaUniversityappearingon behalf of resPondent No.2'

2.7 eti ioner a ach dt r Co rt r nde r "...to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents more particularly Respondent No.3 ln not allowing the petitioner to attend the examination to be conducted on October 27 ' 2025 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violations of prin.lpfut of naiural justice and consequently direct the I"ipinJuntt to permit the petitioner to attend the examination on October 27 , 2025. "

3. The case of averments made in t the Detitioner i he affid avit filed bv the oetitioner I n brief as Der f the re nt Writ Pe s nder It is specific case of the petitioner that the petitioner though a Non-Telangana student and native of Kerala state is pursuing 2 S\..r his B.Com Eiusiness Studies at Loyola Academy, Secunderabad and he is pr<:senfly in the V Semester and the pet itioner was not permitted l]) Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to appear for the B.Com (Business studies) v semester examination schedured on October 27, .2025 It is fLrrt her the case of the petitioner that as per the attendance list published on October 10, 20;15, petrtioner,s attendance was shown as 64.37o/o, while the requrred attendance is 75o/o, with a reraxation of roo/o for medical reascns, effectivery making 65% the permissible minimum. The petitioner contends that a margiral shortfall of O.5o/o should be condoned to prevent the loss of itn academic year, which would ariversely affect petitioner'S career. Hence, this writ petition is filed by the petitio n e r. PERUSED THER CORD. DISUCS SIOt\l ND N USI N

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the Writ petition could be disposed of directing the 2nd and 3rd respondent to consider the representati(,n of the petitioner,s father, dated SN, J

13.1O.2O25 addressed'to the respondent No'3' through which a request is made by petitioner's father to rectify the error that crept in the marking of attendance of the petit3oner and to permit the petitioner to attend the examinationscheduledon2T'LO'2O25,inaccordanceto law, within a reasonable Period'

5. Learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2 submits that it is the 3'd respondent who is the Authority competent to examine the grievance of the petitioner and to consider the same in accordance to law. Takin int con ider tion : - a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case' b) The submissions made by the learned counse! appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2 rit P titio is di fd ectin s nden oco n sider r vanc f the itione 4 j \, Sr". .l vt e r a

13.1 o. 2025 father as pu add ressed the 3"1 rectifi ca tio n of er rtnm rk in the petiti oner Busin ss stu ies in L further to Der res po ndent he rr: in seeki nq the a ten at1 e oa t to atte n d the cla sses of B.com ol A ad m nd ra Se d tp titioner to attend th e exa minationon 27.1o.2o25, in a ccor forthwi.th a nd dulv nce to com m unicat(r the d ecisi on on the reDresenta tion of the ton r's father. dated 13.1O.2O25 addressed to the 3.d e res ond nth erein. However, there shall be n<r order as to costs. law, Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shal stand closed. //TRUE COPY// S ISTA SD/-G. JYOTHI NT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER eta.iat, State of The Principal Secretary, Education Department, I elangana at Jyderabad. The Osman a University, Hyderabad. TlePrincipal rihri N.B.babu SJ, Loyola Academy (Autonomous) Degree and PG College. Two CCs to Go FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, High Court for the State of Telangana at llyderabad. [OUT] One CC to SRt V T.KALyAN, Aivocate IOPUCI ONE CC tO SRI M.SRINIVAS REDDY, SCrON'OSrr,rNNIA UNIVERSITY, Advocate (OPtJC) Two CD Cotries To 1 2 3 4 5 Cl 7 SA bs Y{ HIGH COUITT DATED: 1Tt,lOt2O2S ('.(.IODAY 1til, s14 '.)) 24t[T m' z. .C) * Cs * ORDER WP.No.31B4t2 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W,P WITHOUT COSTS. ^l co[aYer'i \C \q. ffdr,