Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly writ one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No. 1 in not allowing the petitioner to appear for written test/interview for selection and appointment to the post of Office Assistant as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in 1996(6) Scale 676 and consequently to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for selection and appointment to the post of Office Assistant without insisting that the name of the petitioner should be sponsored by the Employment Exchange; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI B.P.RAJU Advocate for the Petitioner and of Govt. Pleader for Employment and Training for respondent No.2, the Court made the following:
ORDER:
Post ‘ for admission’ after three (3) weeks. In the meanwhile, the respondents shall consider the case of the petitioner for the post of Office Assistant, if he is otherwise insisting on sponsoring by the Employment eligible, without Exchange.
//TRUE COPY// To ASSISTANT REGISTRAR for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
The Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh Heavy Machinery & Engineering Ltd., (A Government Company), Kondapalli, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Krishna District.
The District Employment Officer, Vijayawada, Krishna District ( 1 & 2 by RPAD)
3.2 CCs to the G.P. for Employment and Training, High court of A.P.Hyd. (O.UT) 4. One C.C.to Sri B.P.Raju Advocate (OPUC) 5.one spare copy. Bsr HIGH COURT LNR.J DATED 8-09-0211 POST FOR ADMISSION AFTER THREE WEEKS. ORDER W.P.NO. 25145 OF 2011 DIRECTION Bsr Dt. 9-9-2011 HIGH COURT LNR.J DATED 8-09-0211 POST FOR ADMISSION AFTER THREE WEEKS. ORDER W.P.NO. 25145 OF 2011 DIRECTION
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.