The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 praying that.in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the C.C. No. 10218 ot 2421 on the file of the lll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. ; l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in C.C. No. 10218 of 2021 against the Accused on the file of the lll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, in pursuance or the Compromise as withdrawn against the Petitioner/Accused, in the interest of justice; |A.NOS.3&40F2025 BETWEEN: SYED ABDUL RASHEED,, S/o Syed Abdul Majeed, Age 63 Years, Occ Private services R/o H.no. 9-4-5411218, - Towlichowki Hakeempet, Hyderabad ...PETITION ER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT AND I

1. The state of relangana, Through PS Rein Bazar, Hyderabad Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad 2 SYED ABDUL KAREEM @ SYED ABDUL KALEEM, S/c Syed Abdut Rasheed, age 37 years, Occ Business, R/o. H. No. 9-4-5411218, Hakeempet, Banjarahills, Hyderabad RESPON DENT/COMPLAI NANT ... RESPO N D E NT/AC C US E D l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under section 359(6) rlw 528 of BNSS, 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to file the Compromise petition in view of the Compromise between the parties in connection with the C.C. No 10218 of 2021 against the Accused on the file of the Ill Additionar Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Hyderabad for the offences under section 465,468, 471 4ZO IPC and 156 (3) CRPC, l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) rtw 528 of BNSS, 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to RECORD the compromise for quashing the criminal caie against Respondent No: 2 herein and quash the proceedings against the respondents No. 2 / Accused C.C. No. 10218 of 2021 against the Accused on the file of the lll Additional chief Metropotitan Magistrate, Hyderabad This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri GULAM RABBANI, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Addl. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and Sri Ali Hussain, Advocate appear for the Respondent No.2; The Court made the following: ORDER /\ THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.13661 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.10218 of 2021 on the file of the lll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471, 42A of lndian Penal Code & 156 (3) OF Cr.P.C.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondent No.2 that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 & 4 of 2025 has been filed by respondent No.2 to record compromise between them .

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the compromise petition.

4. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vide orders dated 23.10.2025 1 ETD, J /A.Nos.3 & 4 ot 2025 in/and Cdp.No.13661 of2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee :shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 01 .11 .2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion, entered into compiromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 20ZS are allowed. consequently, the criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in c.c.No.1oz1\ of 2021 on the fite of the lll Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered against the petitioner/accused are hereby quashed subject to the petitioner/accused is paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the secretary, High court Legal services committee, High court for the state of relangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the Director, sainik welfare, Hyderabad (savings A/c.No. s21gilg2621g, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (2ooro), IFSC code:s81N0020070, MlcR \r. I 3 E'TD, J ,.A.lJos.3 & 4 of 2025 inland Crlp.No.13661 of 2025 No.50000 40571, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending; shall stand closed. /,TRUE COPY// SD/- N SRIHARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, l.ThelllAddl.ChiefMetropolitantvlagistrate,Hyderabad 2. The Station House Officer, Banjarahills P'S', Hyderllad 3. One CC to SRl. GULAM RABBANI Adrlo-gat^e IOPUC] 4. One CC to Sri Ali Hussain, Advocate (OPUQ) S. Two CCs to pueLrCFRObrCUfOn, Higr' Cirurt at Hyderabad (OUT) 6. Two CD CoPies (Alongwith a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) Note: Totat Amount of Rs.10,o0o/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Gulam Rabbani, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 13.11.2025 as Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "The Director of sainkik welfare at Hyderabad Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, High Curt Buildings Hyderabad' and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No'132239 of 2025' VSI\4/PSL : ; ,: { I I HIGH COURT DATED:1311112025 1t lte s t rl) .,..) rj : ltil ?t15 * Dr .l.- ir v ORDER |A.NOS.3&40F2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.13661 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE IA.NOS.2 & 3 OF 2025 AND THE CRIMINAL PETITION \o INTHEHIGHcoURT0FJUDIEATUREATHYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA !r I.A No: o1 2_nZ5 eBL.!$s Y, I\2 a t ) of 2025 Between:- SYED ABDUL KAREEM @ SYED ABDUL KALEEM, S/o. Syed Abdul Rasheed, u,g", il years, Occ: Business, , R/o. H. No. 9-4-54ll2l\, HakeemPet, , Banjarahills, HYderabad i : AND

1. The State of Telangana , i, Through PS Rein Bazar, HYderaljad Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at HYderabad ... Petitioner/Sole Accused. ..Respondent / ComPlainant

2. SYED ABDUL RASHEED, ' S/o Syed Abdul Majeed, Age: 63 Years, Occ: Private service, R/o H.no. 9-4-541 |UB, Towlickorruki, HakeemPet, HYderabad. ' .,1 . .. Respondent/Defacto-Com plai nant fed that- this oua: praying this Hon'ble court to l.Itissubmittedthat,thisquashpetitir:nisfiled quash the C.C. No, 10218 of 2021',against the Accused on the file of the III Additioftal chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in which Petitioner names is shown as sole accused. I

2. Whereas, due to some misunUderstandlng arose between the petiti::t: ' Accused and Respondent No. 2 hereinTano lod-ged a complaint, basing on which the police Banjara Hills, Hyderabad registered the above case against the petitioner j' ,. /Accused.

3. The respondent No.2 has filed,a criminal complaint bearing F.I'R' No' 134 of 2020 dated: 19.02.2020, the said FIR is registered for the offences punishable u/s ,i tl. :$'!ii .: :.1:-:, : ' 465' 468, 477, 420IPC & 156 (3) CRPC, anri itfl.er completing investigation charge sheet was filed again:;t the petitioner/$ole Accu:;ed herein ancl numbered as .C. No. 10218 of 2o2l and cognizance was taken for tfie offence punishabte U/sec zgz,;isa of IPC, by the Hon'tlle III Additionai Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyder.abad against the petitioner/Accused. 4' That the petitioner submit tlrat as tl-rt: disputes that arose between the petitioner and the respondent No. 2 who are real son and father is resolved, respondent No.2/defacto complainant who is real father of the petitioner/accused has forgave the petitioner/accused; doesn,t want to continue the criminal proceedings as such the present qrud=n pefltion is filed by the parties praying this Hon'ble court to quash the c.c. No. 102i8 of 2azragainst the Accrrsed on the fire of the III Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate. Hyderabad. It is submitted that, in view of the above submissions this Hon,ble Court may be pleased to quash the C.C. No. 10218 of ZO2-L against the Accu;ed on the file of the III Additional chief'Metropolitan ivlagistratr,:, Hyderabad ancr tc prass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble courllimay rleem fit and proper ii the interest of justice, for which the respondent No.2- has no cbjection. Date: 16-10-2025. Place: Hyder"abad. wCou for the petitioner. Counsel for Respondent No.2 4/ Petitioner /Accused k"l 4 Respondent No.2/ Defacto complainant i: ,lr .+