Chinthala Narsimha Reddy v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in not surveying, demarcate and fixing up the boundary stones to the land of the petitioner in Survey No.103/1RU, admeasuring Ac.0-10 guntas and land in Sy.No.103/1R, admeasuring Ac. 1=30 guntas situated at tMailardevpally Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violation of Article 14;21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia besides in violation of Telangana Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to survey the land of the petitioner in Survey No.103/1RU, admeasuring Ac.0-10 guntas and land in Sy.No.103t1R, admeasuring Ac.1-30 guntas situated at Mailardevpally Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in the interest of justice -,.l,:li ^h. j:r!i,... lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the rel;pondents 2to 4 to survey, demarcate and fix up the boundary stones to the land of the petitioner in Survey No.103/1RU, admeasuring Ac.0-10 guntas and land in Sy.No.103/1R, admeasuring Ac. 1-30 guntas situated at N/ailardevpally Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of ttte above writ petition, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. ARUN KUMAR counsel forthe Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, ASST. Gp FoR REVENUE The Court m;ade the following: ORDER ! I\, ORDER 'I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.322O5 of 2o.25 This Writ Petition, under Article "226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief: "...to issue an order or direction or wnt more particularly one in the nature of Wit of Mandamis declaing the action of tlrc respondents 2 to 4 in not surueying demarcate and _ftxing up the boundary sfones to the land of the petitioner in Suruey No.103/1RU admeasuring Acs.O.l0 guntas and land h Sy./[o. 103/2R admeasuring Acs.1-30 guntas, situated at Mailardeupally Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddg Distict as illegal arbitrary contrary to latu and uiolation of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India besides in uiolation of Telangana Suruey and Boundaries Act,1923 and consequently direct tlrc respondents 2 to 4 to suruey the land of the petitioner in Suruey.No.103/ lRU admeasuring Ac.O.10 guntas and land in Sg.No.1O3/ 1R admeasuring Ac.1.30 guntas situated at Mailardeupally Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District in the interest of justic€.,."

2. Heard Sri G.Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for the respondents and perused t!9___ record \ \ \ 'lllts ,:, -g . : ,:rEil* It I l i : : I YI II I

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would subrnit that petitioner herein is the absolute owner and possessor of agricultural land to an extent of Ac. 1.20 guntas ln Sy.No.103/1RU and Ac.O.10 guntas in Sy.No.1O3/2R, total to an extent of Acs.1.3O guntas, situated at Mailardevpally Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The revenue authorities also issued pattedar passlrook and title deed uide Patta No.43. Later oD, the petitioner sold out Ac.1.2O guntas in Sy.No. IO3/1RU to the third parties and remaining Ac.0.10 guntas of land stands in the name of the petitioner and established RO Water Plant. +. The mother of the petitioner is also the absolute owner "and l)ossessor of agricultual land to an extent of Ac.i.3O guntas in Sy.No.IO3/1R, situated at Mailardevpally Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The revenue authorities also issued pattedar passbook and title deed uide Patta No.145. During her lifetime, mother of the petitioner execut-ed a registered gift deed in favour of the son of the petitioner. Later on, mother of the petitioner passed away on

05.01.2008 leaving behind the petitiorr.r as her legal heir. [, Page 3 of4 The petitioner made F-line applications Nos.DERO225O1219697 and DERO225OL2l9703, dated

13.09.2025 to respondent No.3 to survey the land and demarcate the same by fixing the boundary stones in Sy. No. lO3 I I RU, admeasuring Ac.0. 10 guntas and Sy.No.103/1R, admeasuring Acs.1.3O guntas, situated at Mailardevpally Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said F-line applications, respondent Nos.2 to 4 did not act upon the same Aggrieved by the said inaction, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

5. Whereas, Iearned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that the respondent- authorities will consider the aforesaid F-line applications submitted by the petitioner by following the due procedure laid down under law and condu.ct survey and demarcate the \ aforesaid land by fixing boundaries.

6. In view of the aforesaid discussion, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent-authorities to consider \ \ r+.ffir* r ,..";: .;.i* ..i the F-line applications bearing Nos.DERo22soL2l969z and DEF:O225OL2lg7O3, dated t3.Og.2O2S submitted by the I petitioner, conduct survey and demarcate the aforesaid land by fixing boundaries, strictly in accordance with law b-y putting the petitioner and all affected. parties on notice and affor,ling them an opportunity. If respondent-authorities are not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioner, they shall pass an order assigning specific reasons and comnlunicate copy of the said order to the petitioner. They shall complete the entire exercise u,ithin a period of forty five (45) viorking days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ,{s a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall s;tand dismissed. SD/. M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGISTRAR6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, District, Secretar iat, "Hydera bad. District,'felangana -501 51 0.

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, The State of Tqlangana, 2. ihe DistriciCottector, Kongara kalan village lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy 3. The TahsildarlRajendra Nagar fVlandal, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy 4. The tMdrrdal Surveyor, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga 5. One CC to SRI G. ARUN KUIIAR, Advocate 6. Two CCr; to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court 7. Two CD CoPies ,W BN loPUCl for the State of Telangana. Reddy District. TKS HIGH COURT DATED .2511012025 t, { ORDER lHE S ( 1 | q,rq 1pfr <- .l\ * WF,No.:12206 of 2025 --:_: DISPOSIING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS :-I KS rcf tf za I i I