The High Court · 2025

circumstances stated rn the affrdavit fired therewith, the High'court may pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more oie in the nature of writ of l\liandamus to declare the in action of the iespondenis No z & 31n not considering the written representation dated 2210,72024 submitted by the Petitioner is irregar. contemprated under the Law, as being ilegar, arbitrary, unjust and procedure contemprated under the Law, as being i[e;ar, arbitrary, unjust and viorative of Article 21 and 30o-A of the constitution if lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 and 3 to unblock the petitioner "particuraa/ Agricuiture land n S 7.No. 274lA/E an extent of Ac. 6-11 situatecl at Dhoolmitta Village and L4andal Sliddipet Drstrict. T S , IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petitron uncer Sectron 151 CPC praying that in ihe I tilumstances stated in the affrdavit frled in supJrort cf lhe petrtron. the High Courl tr:ty be pieased to pass orders drrectrng the Responcjenl No.2 and 3 hei'er..r Ia conslder and pass appropriate orders o r the representation dated 22-C7-20)! pendrng disposal of the main Vy'rit Petrtro n Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. RAJESWAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: SRI L. RAVINDER. ASST. GP FOR RE,VENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4 to 7: - - - - The Court made the following: ORDER ' - -:----=:-:'-:' THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.318O3 of 2025 ORDER 'I'his Writ Pe titior-r is filed sceking writ of manctamus declaring thc action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not considering the representation dated

22.O7 .2024 submitted by the petitioner, as illegal, arbitran, and in violation of Article 2l and 300-4, of the Constitution of India and consequently Lo direct the rcspondcnts 2 & 3 to unblock the agriculture land to an extent of Acs.6.1 I guntas 1n Sy.No.27alA/E, situated at Dhoolmitta villergc and Mandal, Siddipet DisLrict (hereinafter will be referred to as 'subject property')

2. Heard lealned counsei lor the petitior-rer and Sri L.Ravinder, lcarned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is zrbsolute owner and possessor of the E55.\. j_,;i . l slLbject procertv. There is a civil disptrtr: ltelu.een the pctitione r ir;td the respondents 4 lo 7 . Th,r rt.sponcjcnts 1 Lo 7 havr: {l1crl sr-rit in O.S.No.S9 of 2O2- rrr rhc lllc of I)rir-rcip:r1 District Judgc at Siddipet. A.s p,.,r. 1hc orclcrs lrassecl in I.A.No.B1B ol 2022 in the srricl suit or-r

06.01.2023. the respondents 2 & 3 har.t blor:ked the szrid propenr. and placed the same in rltc prohibitcd list on l,+ Ct3.2024. Alter contest, ttre s,rid snit rvas rlismisscd vicle judgment datcd l,t.()3.2024 'l't-rcreaftcr', thc petitioner submittetl a clctailed lr: prescn t irtiolt on 22.O7.2024 requestine ro unblock thc: sub.jer:t property from the prohibiterl lisr. Despile rt:ceivir-rg zrnd acknowledging the si.trnc. the rcspondents dicl not act upon the san.rc. -\ggrievcd by tlrc inaction on the part of the resporrd:lrt.s 2 & 3, pc titioner liled the present u,rit pe titiorr

4. Whereas Sri L.Ravinder, learnerl Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. on rnstructions, u,ould submit that the 2"d respondent will :,lnsider the J online application, if filed in accordance u'ith the provlslons of thc Bhu Bharathi Act' 2025 and the accordance r,l'ith Rulcs macle there uncler' strictlv I l-i lau' ln the light of the said submisslon' without 5. expressing any oPlnlon on thc merits or demerits of the the Petitioner to file in accordance with the application Bharathi Act, 2025 and the Rules approPriate F-line case, libertY 1S granted to provisions of Bhu made thereunder Collector. On filing such applicalron' with the )t'tt\ respondent-District the resPondent d,irected to consicler the same ' strictly 1n No.2 ls accordance with law, by putting the petitioner' respondents 4 to 7 and all other interested parttes on notice and afford an opportunitl' of heartng He shall complete the said exercise witirin a period of 45 rvorking days from the date of receipl of a copy of this order. Since the 2"d respondent is directed to consider the aPPlication of the Petrtroner aJter issuing notice to + tl-re responclcr-rts 4 to 7, issuing rr,rticc to the rr:sponclc:tr.:; .,1 to 7 rs dispensed u,ith (,. Witl'L tlrr: above direction, this Wr rt pctition is disposccl ol irt thc stagc of ildmission. 'l''rerc shall lte no orclcr as to cos[s. As a sequel, the n-i_ sccllancous pctitiorrs. rf any, pending in the Writ l)('tition sl-rall stzrr-rd closed SI)i.P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, Secrela na t tlydtrabad, LS. .Sr:r.re1ary. Revenue Department, The Sf: te of Telangana

1. The Pnn,^ipa 2. The Drstrrct Coli3ctor, Siddipet District, T.S. 3. The TahsilCar. [)hoolmitta I\,4andal, Siddipet District, T S,. 4 One CC to SR,.l RAJESWAR. Advocati; l'OpUCt 5 Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Colrt for the Strrt"^ of Te angana 6. Two CD Cop es Iour] BN BS HIGH COURT DATED:23110i2025 ORDER WP.No.31803 of 2025 ,i.)(' 0 { N0l/ 206 I: I h sspA TCH EO I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS q