High Court · 2025

Petitic,n under Article 226 ot lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstanct:s stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to i) ii) lssue a Writ particularly in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the Re:;pondents in continuing to show petitioners plots 56,60,61 and 62 lan,l in Sy.No. 233/24, 233125 and 233126 of Nizampet village, Qulubullapur Mandar, erstwhire Ranga Reddy District now in Medchar Malkajgiri District as GovernmenUassigned land despite the judgment in W.P. No. 17704 ot 2012 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional; Direrct the Respondents to forthwith de-notify/derete the petitioners, rand fronr the list of GovernmenVassigned lands and mutate them in the name of the petitioners with absolute ownership. lA NO: 1 OF 25 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit flred in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the operation of the revenue records showing the petitioners, rand as Governmenuassigned rand and restrain the Respondents from interfering with the Petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment there. Counsel for ttr'e Petitioner : SRI G.TRINADHA RAO counsel for the Respondents No.'r to 4 : sRr H.soMAlAH ezie snasrnl, AGp FOR ASSTGNMENT, rep., Gp FOR REVENUL Counsel for the Respondents No.S : Ms. INDRAJA, rep., SRI PUTTA KR]SHNA REDDY, SC FOR MUNICTPALITIES The Court made the foltowing: ORDER I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.3185O of 2o,25 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "(i)... Issue a Writ particularly in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in continuing to show Petitioners' Plots 56, 60, 61 and 62 land in Sy.No. 233124, 233125 and 233/26 of Nizampet village, Qutubullapur Mandal, erstwhile Ranga Reddy District now in Medchal Malkajgiri District as "Government/assigned land" despite the judgment in W.P.No.l77O4'of 2Ol2 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional; ii) Direct the Respondents to forthwith de-notiff/delete the Petitioners' land from the list of Government/assigned lands and mutate them in the name of the petitioners with absolute ownership. iii) pass any order or orders or direction that this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

2. Heard Mr.G.Trinadha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.H.Som&iah Ezra Shastry, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4 and Ms.Indraja, learned counsel representing Mr.Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.S. Perused the record.

3. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had filed "- 2 a representation dated 12.04.2025 before respondent No.2 seeking implementation of the order dated 1O.O7.2024 passed by this. Court in W.P.No. 17704 of 2O12. But the said represe:rtation is kept pending till date. Therefore, he seeks direction to respondent No.2 to dispose of the said represe ntation.

4. lx:arned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment contencls that the petitioner, instead of availing appropriate remedy for implementation of the order dated 10.07.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.17704 of 2012, rushed to this Court t,y fiIing the present Writ Petition. Therefore, he seeks to dismiss this Writ Petition.

5. A perusal of the record shows that except filing the postal receipts showing that the petitioner sent representation to respondent No.2, nothing is on record to show that the said representation is acknowledged by respondent No.2.

6. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counse:. and on perusal of the material available on record, this Court without making any observations on the merits or demerits of the case, is inclined to grant liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedies as available under law. J

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. sd/ AS ENIVASA RE ANT RE R /ITRUE COPY// CTION OFFICE R at, Telangana State' To 1 . The Principal Secretary' Revenue Department' S

2. The District colleitor, Medchal Malkajgiri -Distri.ct Hyderabad -500022. lnteorated District office complexes, Anthalpallv iiiffi ;''d;";iei rvtarioai' Telingana' Hvderabad-S and Stamps' 5-3- 953, Registration enavan,"Ifi;;:-" Fl;-tr^Nizim sahi Road osmanguni' rvr.ilr',ii-rii"i, r"langana Stite, Hyderabad - 500001

3. The Commissioner and lnspector Ge..neral of .Registration

4. The Tahasildar, Bachupalli, Medchal Malkajgiri District' Hyderabad - 500090 5. The Commissioner, Nizampet MuniciPal Corporation' Nizampet Municipal corporation, oro aram Faricili;i o"ft;i-t;' Fiigatl'i Ndgar' Hvderabad 5000 90.

6. One CC to SRI G.TRINADHA RAO' Advocate [OPUCI T.TwoCCstoGPforREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateof.Telangana.[oUTl 8. One CC to SRI KRISHNA REDDY PUTTA' SC for MUNICIPALITIES IOPUC] 9. Two CD CoPies. BSt(MP ?c^(. HIGH COURT DATED:2311012025 ORDER WP.No.31850 of 2025 i;ii-iii 'L.:: ,,.'.i r -!.1.. L C) 10 rr8 l0e6 ,( iiA'iLt '2, ,'\. -i.' * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS f,^q q\ "+r4'