✦ High Court of India · 12 Dec 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 12 Dec 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
12 Dec 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,074 words

Acts & Sections

1. Smt. Abhilasha Abhinav, l.A.S, Age and Daughter of not I:r own to tht: petitioner, The District Collector, Nirmal District, Telangar: State.

2. Smt. Ratna Kalyani, Age and Daughter of not known to tf ( petitioner, The Revenue Divrsrirnal Officer, Nirmal Divisron, Nirmal Distri(l Telangana State

3. Srr Marupedda Raju, Age and Son of not known to the pet icner, The Tahsildai, Nirmal Urban Mandal, Nirmal District, Telanga I r State RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners :SRl. B SUDHAKAR REDOY ANI) NEERAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER ,/ IN THE HIGTI COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.3O7O of 2025 DATE: 12.L2.2O25 Between: Goli Raja Gopal and eleven others. AND Smt. Abhilasha Abhinav, IAS and two others. - . Petitioner Respondents ORDER: This Contempt Case is filcd seeking to punish lhe respondents for willfully and deliberatety violating/ disobeying lhe orders passed by this Court in Writ Pctition No.20492 of 2023 datcd 19.03.2025.

2. This Court uide ordcr dated 19.03.2O25, disposed ol the Writ Petition No.20492 of 2023 \t'ith the lollorving obser-r'ations: "7. In uiew oJ seious disputes between the parlies, the ends of justice would be met tf the PetitiorLers are pemlitted to mqke an appropriate oppLication on the fle oJ lhe 2"d respondent Distict Collector, Ntnnql Dstrtct and in tle euent of sucll an appticaton being submitted bg the petitioners, the 2^d respondent is directed to calt for the Jresh reporT from the 4tt' respondent'Talsildor and after Euing an opportunity ol heairry to the petitioners and respondent Nos.6 to 10, the 2"d respondent shall decide the nature of tLe land and its classrTtcatrcn and enlitlement of the claim of tle petittoners that the subject land has been seized to be an agriq tural land and if the subject land is not seized to qn agicultural land, respondent No.s.6 and 7 are enti ed for isiuonce of the potladar pas-sbook-s in accordalce with the provisions of the ROR Act, 1971 . It is neeclless to obserue thal the 4th respondent-Tahsildar, who LS entrusted to corlduct on enquiry' shrzll issue notice to the petttioners and responderLt Nos 6 to 10 I I CHADA VIJAYA v,rive aHAsKAniroo' BHASKAR REDDY Dater2025 r2.r5 r4:06:x O,ortallveoned bvCHADA ,] 2 and also taken into consideration the earlier r. \rt being submitted bg him and atso the pdttad_ar passboc. aut<7 title d-eeds issued in fauour of the pettiioners and subnu I ret))ort to the 2",1 respondent-Distict Co ector to enable t,, , i6 tof" approp:lte oction utthin a period of three (Oq mon I . from the aate oJ fittng oJ such an appltcotton..

3. Learned Assistant Government pleader for Rci ) luo appearlng for respondents produced the letter vide No.D] ,,,:.1l,)O23 tlaLed 27.11.2025 erddressed by the rcspondent No. I ancl sL l,mitted thar in comphance of the orders passed by this Court, r.t.r pondcnts havc issued notices to the concerned parties and the maltr .is pcnding for enquiry and alter completion of enquiry, appropriatc r:tion would be taken rn accordance with law.

4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this Col r is of th..r view that no case is made out to hold that the respondcr r; havc rvrlllully or deliberately violated thc ordcrs of this Court so rr to ilttract the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 197l. 5 Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand clos: I //TRUE COPY// SD/- K.AMMAJI l) :PUTY REGTSTRAR ./:_ SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 Smt. Abhilasha Abhinav I A g, A.S.g and Daughter of not I rown to the petitioner. rhe Diskict correit-or, &inijioll#i"il,T#n[a. r state Smt. Ratna Kalyani, Aoe an n"u" n G oi, i Ji 6 il i diil"?:' fll i?;: fl Bf t?fi ",1 f [",y8 IS_ i : I i:#,il: ii$f fl S iiYr # ",:it i :t,:l:?H#H i""ffi J: i l, B?;t; o,:l,j,fffl -n " ,.S.?,. B SUDHAKAR REDDYAND NEERAJA iEDDY, Advocate

4. One CC to SRI loPUCl L:-- , Y4."ry /

5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE,High courtforthestate of Telangana, Advocate [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies RM/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:12t1212025 I I ORDER CC.No.3070 ot 2025 F. \ ') T. 2 / il,|] 2t126 ) ?Y * t)r !t ,\f(,\).cn { CLOSING OF THE CONTEMPT (.'ASE

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments