The High Court · 2025

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, at Hyderabad. through the S.H.O., Garla Bayyaram Police Station, Mahabubabad District.

2. Bhuky Laxmi, W/o.Late Veeranna, aged about 58 years, Occ. House wife, Wo.Salarthanda, Mahabubabad Mandal and District. ...Respondents/Defacto Complai nant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may' be pleased to call for the records in F.l.R.No. 153 ot 2025, dated 27-OB-2025 on the file of the S.H.O., Garla Bayyaram Police Station, Mahabubabad District against the petitioner accused and quash the same. l.A. NO: 2OF 2025' Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner in connection with F.l.R.No. 153 of 2025. dated 27 -08-2025 on the file of the S.H.O., Garla Bayyaram Police Station, Mahabubabad District, pending disposal of the above criminal petition in this Hon'ble Court. . l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: - Bhuky Laxmi, W/o.Late Veeranna, aged about 58 years, Occ. House wife, Wo.Salarthanda, Mahabubabad Mandal and District. ...Petitioner/Respondent No. 2/Defeacto Complainant AND 1 2 9:f_r.qtl Raju, S/o.Rekya, aged about 35 years, Occ. ;r lricutture, R./o. KodrpunJUta Ihanda, Bayyaram Mandal, Mahabubabac )istrict. ...Respondent petitioners/Accused ]l S.:j1lg1lJ]9l1!s?lq, Rep by its pubtic prosecutor r- sh courr Buitdings, ar Hyoerabad. throuoh the S.H.O., Garla Bayyaram poii, i g1s1;on, Mahabubabad Distriit ...nes[,inaentrti,, f"iio'Comptainant Petition under Section 3s9 (6) R/w 58 of BNSS of 20 3 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of ( )riminal petition, the High court may be preased to permit the petitioner/de I rcto comprainant to compound the offences under Sections 85, 107, 108, rrw ti of BNS in F.r.R.No. 153 of 2025, dated 2r-08-2025 on the fire of the s.H.o., c; rra Bayyaram porice Station, Mahabubabad District by acquitting the Accused/pel tioner. l.A. NO:4 oF 2025 Petition under section 359 (2) r/w Section 58 of BNSS 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundr; cf Criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to record the compromrs., between the both parties to ailow the criminar petition by quashing the proc )edings in F.r.R.No. 153 of 2025' dared 2r-o\-2025 on the fire of the s.H,o., G: rra Bayyaram porice, Station, Mahabubabad District by acquitting the Accused. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing he Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the argumer.s of sri r vasantha Rao, Advocate for the petitioner and the Mr. Jithenc t r Rao Veerama[a, Additional Public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No_1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No.2 a The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.3 and4 ot2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.1 3623 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') seeking to quash the proceedings against him in F.l.R.No.153 of 2O21 on the file of the Garla Bayyaram police Station, Mahabubabad District, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 85,107, 108 read with 62 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused as well as respondent No.2 that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2O2S have been filed to record compromise between them and to compound the offences. a

3. The learned. Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compr0mise petitions.

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de faolo complainant in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 which disclose that she has willingly - consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter 2 EM' J Ct tp tj623 2025 into compromise, they were given a chance to settle 1e matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before 1 e High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangarr I vide orders daled 23.10.2025 passed by this Court' The Secreta y' High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties lnd submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued b1' 'his Court' the parties along with their respective counsel have appt'i red before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State o' ielangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified re parties and submitted a report dated 03'11'2025 stating that li: parties were identified and they have willfully and without any r;' ercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise' ln view of the above, l'A'Nos'3 and 4 of 2t)15 arc allowed' 6. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and he proceedings in FIR No.153 of 2O2'l on the file of the Garla Et ryyaram Police Station, Mahabubabad District' registererl against the petitioner/accused is hereby quashed su )ject to the petitioner/accused is paying an amount of Rs'5'00 t/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary' High Courr Legal Services Committee,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangan:Hyderabadand I 3 ETD,I Crtp lj62j 2025 Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7 lVliscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/- N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR NOTE: This @mmon order is amended as per Court order dated 28-11-2025 vide l.A.No.5/25 by replacing the "S.C.No.73 of 2021 on the file of the Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SC/STs (POA) Act, 1989-cum-Vlt Additionat District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Naga/' with "FlR.No.153 of 2021 on the file of the Garla Bayyaram Police Station, Mahabubabad District" para No.6 of the order. This common order is substituted the earlier order dispatched on 18-11-2025. SD/- N,CHANDRA SEI<HAR DEPUTY R //TRUE COPY// To, ECTION OFFICER Police Station. 1 . The Principal & Judicial First -Class magistrate at 2. The Station House Officer, Garla Bafiaram po tion, Mahabubabad 3 Two ccs to the pubric prosecutor, state of rerangana, High court Buirdings, 4. One CC to Sri. T Vasantha Rao, Advocate tOpUCl 5. Two CD Copies at Hyderabad (OUT) bubabad M ^^(Enclosed PSL a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) U. DLi Note: Total Amount of Rs- '10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand onry ) has been paid by Sri r. Vasantha Rao, counser for the petitioner as directed by the Hon,bre court vide order dated 11.11.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand onry ) to the "Secretary, High court Legal services committee, High court for the state of Telangana, Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/_ ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and fired Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 128194 of 2O2S dated 12.11.2025. t. I l, l I HIGH COURT DATEOi11l11l2O25 28111t2025 AMENDED COMMON ORDER lA. Nos. 3 and 4 of 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.13623 ot 2025 j+ I , 1ELA *<-= .\ \- Fr t/!r '/ ., i. t). c) l]- a l.A. Nos. 3 and 4 ot 2025 AND CR|MiNAL pETtTtON ARE ALLO VED \)- \