Edla Srisailam v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Artlcle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, or any other appropriate writ under Article 226 of the Constitution Of lndia to declaring the in action of the Respondent's Nos. 2 to 4 arc not taking into the considered and not registered the crimes basing on the petitioner complaint dated 2210912025 and the Respondent Nos. 3 to 4 are not provide to the police protection to the petitioner land in Survey Nos. 185 and 186 extent of land is 7 Acres and 14 Guntas situated at Mogiligidda Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Rangareddy District, T.G., in the same land the petitioner grandparents Grave/Samadi also cohstructed by the petitioner father even though the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are threatening to the petitioner by the influence of the illegal land grabbers as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14' 21 and 22 of the Constitution of the lndia and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 3 to 4 are provide to the police protection to the petitioner land in Survey Nos. 185 and 186 extent of land is 7 Acres and 14 Guntas situated at Mogiligidda Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Rangareddy District, T.G., in the same land the petitioner ':i . grandparents Grave/Samadi also constructed by the petitioner and his father and ih"y are regular{y performed ritual ceremony and pujas on their memories due to this reason create peaceful environment lA NO: 1 OF 20;21 Petition underSection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filerl in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 3 to 4 are provide to the police protection to the petitioner land in Survey Nos. 185 and 186 extent of land is 7 Acres and 14 Guntas situated at Mogiligidda Village, Faroognagar Mandal, Rangareddy District, T.G., in the same land the petitioner grandparents Grave/Samadi also constructed by the petitioner and his father and they are regularly performed ritual ceremony and pujas on their rnemories due to this reason create peaceful environment, pending disposal of the main writ Petition lA NO: 2 OF 2025 BETWEEN: \

1. IWs. Gupta Farms, Registered Partnership Firm' Having ts office at M.No' l9-2-23914-6lc' Chandul al Baradari, HYderabad, Represented by its Managing Partner, Rajesh (iupta, S/o. Ramesh GrrPta W;. Plot No.21B, Raghavendra Colony, ShivaramPallY, HYderabad' Aged about: 50 Yrs, Occ: Business, 'R;. Plot No.21B, Raghavendra Colony, Shivar:lmPallY, HYderabad'

3. Abhila.sha Devi, Wo. Roshan Kumar, ' Aged about: 51 yrs, Occ: Busing-tt,-- R.Io H..No. 14423919, Nahar Vrlla Shah Inayath Gunj, Near Otd Police Station, i B'.guto Bazar,HYderabad' 4. Sunde,ra Devi, Wo. Sukan Raj Jain, . : ' .:.. :-'-'' ' R/;. r44, Sakaleshwara Swamy Temple Roa{, . WurO No.5, Sakaleshwapura Hasan, Kamataka- 573L34' " , ',- , n^n2;2^^^--t-- il AND'. ,-.].: l \ \

1. Edla Srisailam, S/o Sayanna, Aged.44 Years, Occ. Farmer, Rl/o. Mogiligidda Village; Farooqnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, T.G. ' ... RespqndenUPetitioner

2. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad

3. The Asst. Commissioner of Police, Shadnagar, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The Circle lnspector of Police, Shadnagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District.

5. The Station House Officer, Shadnagar P.S. Shandnagar Town, Ranga Reddy District. . Res pondents/Res pondents Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the present petitioners to be impleaded as Respondents 5 to B, in the present writ petition and all the miscellaneous petitions, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MALOTHU RAVEENDAR Counstil for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Writ Petition No.31862 of 2o.25 This; rvrit petition is filed seeking the following prayer: "...declaring the tnaction of Respondents Nos.2 to 4 are not taking tnto the cortsicleration and not registered. the crtmes bastng on the petitioner's complaint dated 22/ 09/2025 and Responclent Nos.3 to 4 are not prouide to the police protection to the petitioner lanC in Suruey 1Vos. 185 and 186 to an extent of land in Ac.7-14 gts., situated at Mogiligidda Village, I,'arooqnagar Manda\ Rangareddy District (subject property) in the sante land the petitioner grandparents Graue/ Samadi also corstructed by the petttioner father euen thctugh the Respondent lflos.S and. 4 are threatentng to tlu: petitioner bg tLrc influerrce of ttrc illegal-land grctbbers as illegal, arbitrary artd uiolation of Ariicles 11, 21 and 22 of the Constitution of the Irulia and consequently direct the Respond.ent I[cs.3 to 4 are prouide to the police prote.ction to thrz petitioner land. in Surueg /Vos.J BS and 186 to an. exlent ctf larud Ac.7-14 gts., situqted. ut Mogiligidda Village, Farooqnagar Mand.al, Rongared.d.y Distrtct in the same land. the pettiti.on.er grandparents Gra"ue/ Saruadi also constructed by the petitioner and. ltis father and. _--_t:___:'!'_-_-- ' i! l: l, l; i i I I i . 2 f1 they are regularlA performed itual ceremony and. pujas on their memories due to this reason create pe acetful enuironment. . . "

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for: Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4. With their consent, this writ petition is taken up for disposal

3. The facts of the case in brief as stated are that petitioner and his ancestors claims to be original owner of the subject property and the same is Laoni patta land. The said land was acquired from the State G-overnment in the year I9BZ by the grandfather of the petitioner and that the petitioner is cultivating the said land. [t is submitted that one Mr.Rajesh Gupta and others have illegally trespassed into the petitioner's land and destroyed the petitioner's crops with the help of JCB. In that regard, petitioner made several complaints to respondent Nos.2 to 4, however, no action has been initiated against the said,accused persons. It is further submitted that petitioner's grandfathers graves ,..--ilf"e**if,r.*Lhg.**s*Bhj€g*.,..P,Lgp,g"*y**m.d,".a+*-f*2J*Q9**?Q?J,5,,*IffiR"tr,.!,[1.g..-**n.*.'.;::.i!,rr.b.rtiiq....r.,<r,... petitioner and his family members are performing poojas, aJ the above said persons along with henchmen threatened the petitioner in filthy language with dire consequences and also physically assautted the petitioner and his family members. Accorclingly, petitioner lodged a complaint before respond.ent No.4, however, respondent No.4 refused to receive th.e complaint, subsequently, petitioner sent the complaint through registered post on 22.O9.2025. Learned counsel clraws attention of this Court to the complaint dated 29.09.2025 and would submit that there are certain disputes pending in o.s.No.a2g/2022 before trial courts rvith regrrd. to the subject property. Since, no action is forthcoming on the complaint, the present writ petition is filed.

4. The Sub-tnspector of Police, Shadnagar Police Station 'nas placeci a copy of instrtrctions through learned Assistar.t Government Pleader for Home ancl would submit that olt the complaint made by ttre petitioner on

22.O9.2C25, respondent No.4 made a GD entry and enquiry has been conducted and after thorough enc1uiry, the responrlent Police closed the complaint as 'civil irr natttre' and inr-imated tlte sa.me to the petitioner through noLice \ \ 1 \ I : I .. ,,] i: j..::. : .. 4 .fi dated 07.Lo.2o25 by suggesting the petitioner to approach the competent civil court for redressal of his grievance. It is further submitted that respondent No.4 has not received any specific order from the competent court to provide police protection to the petitioner. As sqch respondent No.4 conducted enquiry and closed the complaint as 'civil in Nature' and the allegation that respondent No.4 has not conducted enquiry is false and baseless and accordingly prayed to dismiss the writ petition.

5. In that view of the matter, since the complaint of the petitioner has already been closed as 'civil in nature'by respondent No.4, this writ petition is disposed of with a .direction to respondent authorities to follow due procedure as contemplated under of law for further course of action, if any. Needless to state, petitioner may seek appropriate remedy as available under law. Miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// to,

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, of Telangana, Hyderabad SD/. M. JAWAHAR OFFICER Buildings, The State

2. The Asst. Commissioner of Police, Shadnagar, y District.

3. The Circle lnspector of Police, Shadnagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District.

4. The Statior House Officer, Shadnagar P.S. ShandnagarTown, Ranga Reddy District.

5. One CC tc SRI IvIALOTHU RAVEENDAR, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs 1o GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies PVL a HIGH COURT DATED:30/1 012025 \ ORDER THE S ( 6 I ) ,:il 2l]2fr o,J * WP.No.31862 of 2025 Parcvrt DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (r\" Sto \ \ I I ' il'. ._-... ;eE.i:.),.:: -. |i#.:!:+'.i'r .;ffia::-.lti::-