VeldiJagan _lt4olqn Rao v. '1 . The State of Telangan-a

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.6 in not deciding the claim statement filed by the petitioner in LAOP.no.B of 2019 on the file of respondent no.6 and not depositing the compensation amount of Rs.10,95,000/- per acre on par with other land losers, though submitted possession certificate issued by the Tahsildar, Sathupalli Mandal and other. relevant documents 7 establishing clear title as illegal, arbitrary and in violation tc Art 14,21 and 3O0A of Constitution of lndia and consequently to direct the Respondent no.6 to d isbu rse/depo sit the compensation amount of Rs.10,95,()r 0/- per acre on par with other land losers duly deciding the claim statement filr: , by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible with interest @ 18 o/o per annum. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section I5'1 CPC praying that in the ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou : may be pleased to consider the representation dt. 25.10.2024 submitted tc, the Dist. Collector, Khammam Dist., pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ABDUL AZAM KHAN counsel for the Respondent No.1, 3, 4 & 5: SRI SOMU SRll\ VAS REDDY, AGP FOR LANI) ACQUISITION Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Ms. C.URMILA The Court made the following: ORDER ;*&" 1'IIE }iONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.31857 AF 2025 ORDER This firit Petition is filed under Adicle 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking tre foliowing relief "...fo /ssoe a',vrit, order or direction mare particularly one in the nalure oi a writ of Llan.hnius declariog the action of the respondent No.6 in nol decding the claim sdier,:ent filed by the petitiotrcr in LAAP.N1.8 of 2019 on the file of resportdenl i\)a.6 and n! depositlng the compensation amount of Rs.i0,95,0CA/- pet ade ott par with other land losers, though submitled po.ssess/rn cef,ficate issued by lhe Tahsildar, Sethupalli liandal and ather rJle,/anl clocuments estaDrshlrg clear title es llegal, arbitrary and in violation to tlrl., 14 2i aflC 3o0A tt Cottstitution and consequently to direct the Responda!'il t'la 6 to cjisburse/deposit lhe compensation amount of Rs.10.9a LLA/- oer acre ott pa( with otl)er land losers duly deciding ihe clam state m4;, ti!ed \'- the petiticner as expeditiousty as possible with interest at 16 pet aeitl i,e: ,,t1.'jL!rr and ta pa]s..."

2. HearC r\lir'lrbdul A.zani Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr.Somu Srinivas Red<I1r, learned Assistant Gcvernment Pleader for Land Acquisiticn, appearirrg for respondent Nos.1,3,4 and 5 and Ms.C. Urmila, iearned counsel fcr the respondent No.2

3. Learned ccunsel foi the petitioner submits that responc ent Nc.6 has rict crlpcsitec the clarm statement filed by the petitioner in L.A.O.P. lia. B of 2079, despite ihe petitioner having submltted the possession certilcate issuecl i:y the l'ahsildar, Sathupalli Mandal 2 NT& J W.I Yo.3185? of 2O2S Hence, the present petition has been filed seekrr I appropriate orders. lt is further submitted that in respect of oii-r. claimants in L A.O.P No 619 of 2014, filed by the petitioner conce,r ring an extent of land measuring Ac 489 04 guntas in Kommepa I Village and Ac.34.39 guntas in Lankapally Village, the lands were: :quired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act. 1994. ln tt rt matter, this Court had directed respondent No.6 to consider *rr :laims of the petitioner and to pass appropriate orders within a s pulated time frame. Accordingly, the petitioner prays for a similar I 'ection in the present case.

4. Learned counsei for ths r.rt..cients subrnits t-: : tliere are no specific objections to the relief sought by the petitio.er

5. lhave perused the material placed on record. 6 Having regard to the solitary ctaim of the peti i ner and the analogous order passed by this Court in l_.A.O.p No )19 of 2014, this Court directs respondent No.6 to consider the r aims of the petitioner in L.A.O.P. No. B of 2019 and to pass apprc[ r ate orders in accordance with law within a period of six (06) weeks I om the d atg" of receipt of a copy of this order. l NTR. J W.P.No.3I857 of 2O25 7 With the abcve direction, this writ petition ts disposed of There shall be no oroer as to costs Miscellaireous Petitions, pendlng if anv, shall stand closed To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/. B. REKHA SISTANT RE RAR ION OFFTCER '1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue D 99!9i.nSs, BRKR Bhavan, Hydera 500063. epartment (Land cquisition) Secretariat bad, Telangana, State of Telangana- Sinsareni corrieries co Ltd., ' Iil|., TXffit:t%oDirector' 3. The District Collector, Khammam District, Telangana. 4' The Revenue Divisionar officer (LA)(RDO), Khammam District, Terangana. t Revenue officer, Sathupallv Mandat, Khammam District Disrrict, orporate Office, Red +:iaU:H:l

6. The Presiding Officer, District Court, Sathupalli, Sathupalli Diskict. 7. One CC to SRt ABDUL AZAM KHAN, Advocate IOPUCI 8. One CC to Ms. C.URM|LA, Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CCs to Gp for LAN.D_ACOU|SITION, High Court for the State of --" -' 10. Two CD Copies Tetangana at Hyderabad tO0fj BSR/MP ?a,.t^. HIGH COURT DATED: 2311012025 ORDER WP.No.31857 of 2025 o 'r I iEB 2[26 o :l + DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS h \r-.1.,2'