✦ High Court of India · 30 Oct 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 30 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
30 Oct 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,128 words

Acts & Sections

(Cl NIFIRItI/Society / Trust No.0712024), 'S/o Shaik Faiyazlddin, Aged about 45 H.No.-1-4-9, Kumarf e'ase] Yellareddy,

5. Uppari Palli6 Ramesh Goud, S/o Uppariilally Malla Goud, Aged about 57 years, Occufiption. Business, H.No.1-9-AZI,OO4 Azampura, Medak - 502110. 6. Siddi Sridhar. S/o Siddi Ramkishan, AQed about 47 years, Occupation. : Business, H.No.3-4-3/1, Yellareddy, Kamareddy- 503'122,.

7. Noor Jahan, W/o Late. Mohd. Ashfaq Ahmed, Ageshbout 63, Occupation. Housewife, Presently residing at H.No20-4-2371C', Khilwath, Chariminar, Hyderabad - 500064.

8. Tasneem Sulthana, Wo Late. Mohd. Fazill, Housewife, H.No.8-1-40N2, 1St Floor, Hyderabad - 500008. Ghousia Begum Shaista, Wo Late Mohd. Abdul Rasheed, Aged years, Occupation. Housewife, R/o. f.Llto. 12-2-396lN46T1lA Mahaveer Nagar, Asif Nagar, Hyderabad -.500028. ,Aged about.64 years, Occupation. 'Samatha Colony, Toli Chowki, about 56 and B, I I I I i i 10 Mohd. Abdur shoib, S/o.Late-Mohd. Abdur Rasheed, Aged about 35 vears. occupation.Business.nr_o.^r1.1rqo.iz-i-beditaliiA;n,i'a-]tur1i""i!!irG6l?; Asif Nagar, Hyderabait -SOgOaO.

11. Mohd. Abdut Musheeb. occu patio n. B u si n ess.' R/_o. EN-o; .- | 2 _C_zsil N i; flii ;;.i Asif Nagar, Hyderabad - SOOOZA. .i, M#il;i dffi;: F,h-Lrlg Motrd. Abdut Rasheed, Aged about 32 vears. 12 Mohd' Abdul Najeeb, S/o Late.Mohd. Abdur Rasheed, Aged about 28 vears. occupation.Business.nr.o-g4d.1i_z:i-eHA/.i6ii/X;;;'"8,nffi ffi ;dffi i; Asif Nagar, Hyderabad _ sotiO2a.

13.Mohd. Abdut Naveed, Sl9 i919.nro.rg. Abdut Rasheeo,iln"o about 25 vears. L# Nffi Jl occ u pat io n. B u s i n e ss. w_q.._q..No. 1 z:b_is67*i6/ n-Jtr il Asif Nagar, Hyderabad _ SOOOZa. -t\r;ffi :1 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226rbf the constitution or tnoia praying that in the circumstances stated in the afildavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased topreased to issue a writ or any other appropriate writ, order or direction or particurarry writ Mandamus decraring the action of the respondent no.3 in not considering the representation., dated. 0g.0g.2025 for removing the iilegar temporary shutters constructed by the respondent nos. 4 to 13 in Sy. No. 75 and its parts of safdarpur Virage, yerarectdy Mandar, Kamareddy District, as iregar, arbitrary. i lA NO:1 OF 2025 Petition under Section tSj]CpC prayi the affidavit filed in support of the petition direct the respondent no. 3 tq..Sp the con Ac.9.00 Gts, in Sy.No.ZS aiiO it$ parts, situ Mandal, Kamareddy District, und3rtaken by t disposal of the main writ petition. ng that in the cirburrystances stated in , the High Court may be pleased to struction activity in and admeasuring ated in Safdalpur Village, yellareddy he Respondeni Nos. 4 to 13, pending . r' lA NO: 2 OF 2025 I Petition under section rt#epc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondent no. 3.. $g forthwith consider the [epresentation dated. 08.09.2025, pending disposat oithe main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI DEEPAK MISRA counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FoR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEv counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: sRl K. PRADEEP REDDY, sc FoR GRAN PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respon{snt Nos. 4 to 6 : SRI VIJAY B. PAROPKARI Counsel for the Respond-ent Nos. 7 to 13: --- t, The Gourt made the follo'iving: ORDER 1" 'r I .a :I a -l' THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. IUADHAVI DEVI ORDER: WRIT PETITION No.31Z8O O!. 2O2S In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent No.3 in not considering his representation dated oB.og.2025 for removing the illegal temporary shutters constructed by respondents No.4 to 13 in Sy.No7S and its parts of Safdarpur village, yellareddy Mandal, Kamareddy District, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj appearing lbr respondent No.1, Sri K.Pradeep Reddy, learned standing counsel for Gram Panchayat appearing for respondents No.2 & 3 and Mr.vijay B.Paropkari, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.4 to 6.

3. Respondent No.3 filed counter affidavit statingrthat the writ petitioner has given representation dated 22.09.2025 for which the respondent No.3 has issued notice dated 2s.og.2o2| to respondent No.4 to stop and remove the temporary construction in Sy.No.75. It is also stated that further action will be taken as pe/iar". +. The unofficial respondents also filed counter affidavit stating that they have submitted explanation on 27.og.2o25 to the notice dated 25.09.2025 and the copy of the said explanation is also enclosed to the counter affidavit. , , -2-

5. In view of the above, this Court deems fit and proper to direct the respondents to consider the objection of the petitioner as well as the explanation submitted by the respondents No.4 to 13 before taking any decision on the notice issued by them on 25.09.2025. The respondents shall take a decision within a period of one (01) month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, by affording an opportunity of personal hearing to all the respective parties, if necessary.

6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed. SD/. P. PONNA KRISHNA REGISTRAR ASSI t:.. i i:i l;- //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER \ ,I To,

1. The Principal Secret4ry;,'p"n.hayat B.aj .ano. Rural Development Department, i: i' S ecretariat, The Statqbf.[elan g ana, Hyd erabad . i I 'r\

2. The District Panchayath Officer, Kamareddy, Kamareddy District' 3. Panchayat Secretary,"The Saf{alpqr Gram Panchayath, Safdalpur Village, Yellareddy Mandal, Kanareddy District. d ,r : i, 4. One CC to SRl. DEEB,EtI(.tvllSRA, Advocate IOPUC] S. One CC to SRt X. pnAOeEP REDDY, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT 6. One CC to SRI VIJAY B. PAROPKARI, Advocate TOPUCI 7. Two CCs to GP FOR'.PANCHAYAT nnl RURAL DEV,High court for the rrsrtcr. State of Telangana. [OU-T]

8. Two CD CoPies PVL \qr HIGH COURT DATED:3011012025 'I ORDER WP.No.31780 of 2025 { t ? o,) I ( .tl. ;'l'L:i'.'. - /i, -t (.'l a -t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COST€ \\ *CuA \+ ffi'{'t

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments