✦ High Court of India · 17 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 17 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
17 Oct 2025
Length
1,077 words

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. K Venkatesh Gupta Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : None appeared Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : Sri Pawan Kumar Y.V. The Court delivered the following: I I : t. i I u I i t, TH]E HON'BLE JUSTICE B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.121 20L5 JUDGMENT: Ttiis M.A.C.M.A. is settled before Lok Adalat vide Award dated 13.09 .2025 passed by the Lok Ada]at Bench of High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the Sta[e of Telangana, Hyderabad. In view of the salne, nothing remains in the present M.A.C.M.A.

2. Accordingly, this M.A.C.M.A. is disposed of in terms of the Award dated 13.09.2025 passed by the Lok Adalat Bench cf High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court fcrr the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order and miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the M.A.C.M.A. shall stand closed sd/- M. JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To,

1. The Cnairman, Motor Accident Claims cum-lvlotor Accidents Claims Tribunal , Mahabubnagar. (With records) Vlll Addl.District Judge-

2. One CC to Sri. K Venkatesh Gupta, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Pawan Kumar Y.V, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies (Enclosed a copy of Lok Adalath Award) KH/DL W '= :.,:li ' $r.: r;ts'-.; "i- - I '1i I ..d ,:! € HIGH COI.IRT DATED:1711012o2s I JUDGMEN'T MACMA.Nct.121 of 2015 1 t ilAR ?0[i ! * DISPOSING OF THE MACMA IN TERMS OF AWARD PASSED BY LOK.ADALAT WITHOUT COSTS G*6d &* BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. IUnder Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 19E7 (Central Act)] Date:13-09-2025 I (l HI t I lhc Strtc Present:1. Hon'bte Justice G.Sri Devi, (Former Judge of HiSh Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman

2. Smt.Nandita Gulra, Advocate, Member M.A.C.M.A.No.12i of 201 5 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGATNST MVOP.No.l 91 of 2013 (On the fite of the Judge, Famity Court-Cum-Vlll Additionat District Judge at Mahabubnagar) Between:- Ramachandraiah, S/o.Gatenna, Age: 42 years, Occ: Driver, R/o. Kothakota Vittage, Presentty residing at Teachers Cotony, Mahabubnagar. AND .... Appellant/Claimant

1. Rajeshwara Reddy, 5/o. Pandu Ranga Reddy, age: Major, Occ: Owner of the JCB bearing No. AP ZZ AG 3136, R/o-H.No-1'29, Nerettapatty vitlage, Thimmajipet Mandat, Mahabubnagar District.

2. lClCl Lombard General lnsurance Company Limited, Represented by its Divisionat Manager, 3'd Ftoor, BGR Towers, Chaitanyapuri, Ditsukhnagar, Hyderabad. Respondents/Respondents . Counsel for Appettant/Ctaimant : Sri K.Venkatesh Gupta, Advocate/ Sri V. GoPat Yadav, Advocate Representative of lnsurance Company : Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior Manager - Legat Ctaims Counsel for the lnsurance Company i "' This appeat having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and atso the parties, the fottowing award is passed: Compensation Awarded by the Tribunat AWARD with proportionate costs and Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One takh onty) interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of fiting of ctaim titt the date of deposit amount. A Compensatron Awarded (Setttenrent Reactred) in the Lok Adatat. l'lrjs is an appeal frtea ny ihe tretiiioner/Ctairnant aggrievcct uy [n* oG, pir:;secl in MVO[, I'1r,,.'t91 of 1013 by ttre Juclge, lrarrrity C,ourt-currr-Vlll AclditionaI Di:trict Juclg;e at Mahabutrnagar. \ F, ; Sri Mohamrned Abdut Shabbeer, Senior Manager-Legat Claims for the Respondent I'io.2-lnsurance Company has appeared before the Lok Adatat and represented that the Appettant/Petitioner/Ctaimant has appeared and identified before thc. District Legal Services Auttrority, Mahabubnagar. It is reported by the Respondent No.2-lnsurance Company that during the pendency of this Appeat, both the parties have mutuatty entered into a compromise and settted the nratter. ln pursuance of the setttement, the Appettant/Petiticiner/Ctaimant has agreed to receive an arnount of Rs.1,15,5661- (Rupees One takh fifteen thousand five hundred and sixty- six on(y; towards futt and finat setttement of lris ctaim in addition to tht,, arrrc,ullt atrcady dcpositcd and tlrc lnsurance Cornpany has agreed to p:u/ the :ame towcrrds futl crnd finat setttement of the ctaim. Accordingty, compronrise is recorded and the'rtrward is passed before the Lok Adatat. ln view of t.he above said settlernent, the lnsurance Company has agreecl to deposit the above settted amount within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Award, after deducting the amount that was deposited, if any. lrr the event of defautt or detay in naking such deposit, the clairnant/Appettant/Petitioner is entitted to ,:tainr interest as awarded by the Tribunat. $tn 0 HIGH COLIIt,I LOK ADAI.A.T {G Slatc ot 1 ..- Apportionment of Compensation, if any Additional Direction (:;|

1. The Appettants/Petitioners are entitled to the refund of Court Fee paid in this

2. iit"';r"r^t atready deposited by the tnsurance Company, lr unv, shatt be given credit to.

3. Soon after deposit try the lnsurance Company, the Appettant/Petitioner/Ctairnant is permitted to withdraw his entire share amount without furnishing any security. ln token of consent for the above setttenient and award, the parties and their counsel have signecl tlris award in our presence. ln terrns of the comprc.rrnise arrived at bbtw€len the parties, tlris case stands di:posecl t;[. ['r a \ (l t't I Ituof Po' l{ L !l,t'j,i"l-.!! !i,,,'ir /rJi-11 /i: i'r Ili7 )-otB l^r,.. MAC r(A -,ie; trlV,r> l,:,iri ,ii'! ll ":..lli.lrr i r c, a .iEF i* ti; N*),-"5-619,) ,,lti ;i:,qi{{iii r!. i::' i .\i C**r.\ W fl.-hlr--.--..- Cell: 98401{ i..-l'1,'o i .'-i-\..:.i .:i' l"4ltJ' EI AftY t Sonlo Civit ludgrl altr ! rr:l Le(tL r?r! :rrt AUI hor,, vl-au ,. i ia," I ,\(; Art !\.r"'* c HAlRl, Ar0 C}L ii'r.ii i. .i ' LOK AOAI'AT fr? h t Statc 61 , ,ti: :1, i.

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments