High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not correcting the petitioner's son's name in the 3rd respondent school records in issuing a fresh Bonafide Certificate by correcting the name of the petitioner's son inspite of submitting the representation of the Petitioner dt.16.09.2025 as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of the nature justice and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to correct the Petitioner's son's name as Bodapatla Nishanth instead of Bodapatla Bunty in the 3rd respondent's school records and issue fresh Bonafide Certificate by duly considering the representation of the petitioner dt.16.0S.2025. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c: r umstances stated in the affidavit f iled in support of the petition, the High Cour rnay be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 to correct the Petitionrrr s son's name as Bodapatla Nishanth instead of Bodapatla Bunty in the 3rd -e spondent's school records and issue fresh Bonafide Certificate by duly considering the representation of the petitioner dt 16.09.2025, pending dispc t:rl of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C.HARI PREETH Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION No.31643 o F 2025 ORDER: Heard Sri C.Hari Preeth, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Education appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2-T he oetition er aooroached the Court seekinq Draver as under: "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not correcting the petitioners sons name in the 3'd respondent school records in issuing a fresh Bonafide Certificate by correcting the name of the petitioners son inspite of submitting the representation of the Petitioner dt.16.09.2025 as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of the nature justice and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to correct the Petitioners sons name as Bodapatla Nishanth instead of Bodapatla Bunty in the 3'd respondents school records and issue fresh Bonafide Certificate by duly considering the representation of the petitioner dt.16.09.2025-.."

3. The limited relief sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition is a direction to respondent No.3 to '. 1 \-- -rI 2 SN,J W.P.No.:i1ti43 of 2025 consider the grievance oF the petitioner, as pu': torth vide representation dated 16.09.2025 submitted.to rr,spondent No.3.

4. It is the specific case of the petition€rr that the petitioner's son, Bodapatla Nishanth, studied 7th -l,tss in the respondent No.3 school during the academic year 2022-23, and his name was mistakenly mentioned as Bod. p,ltla Bunty instead of Bodapatla Nishanth. The p€titi,)r,€r, representation dated 76.09.2025, requested rr :spondent No.3 to correct the name to Bodapatla Nishantir irs per the Aadhaar card"

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of tl- e petitioner submits that in spite of the petitioner's represenlat.ion dated

16.09.2025 having been acknowledged by respr: n,lent No.3 school, no orders have been passed on the said representation.

6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that appropriate orders need to be pa:;s,:d on the petitioner's representation dated j,6.Og .2025 art cl ressed to J SN,J W.P.No.31643 ol 2025 respondent No.3 herein in accordance with law and in the interest of j ustice

7. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Education appearing on behalf of the respondents does not dispute the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

8. TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION: a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, b) The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Education appearing on behalf of the respondents, The writ petition is disoosed of, directinq respondent No.3 to Dass aDDropriate orders on the I I etit ne to correct oetitioner's son's name as BodaDatla dated 16.09.2 2 .- \-1 -+ SN,J W.P.No.3:.643 of 2025 Nishanth instead of Bodaoatla Bunty in therlecords of n en No. h re:;_h bonafide titi n r ate to the lJlerinq the oetitioner's qrievance as Dut forth vide j)Jl.litlonst reDresenta tio n dated 16.O9.2O25 within orrc (1) week from the date of receiot of a coov of thi:; ,rrder and n [he said communr du! representation to the petitioner herein. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petit lrrs, if any pending, in the Writ Petition shall also stand clo:;el. To, ,TRUE COPY// sp/. \s:: IF. PONNA KRI l(;rarut Reets SHNA 5 ON OFFICER 1 The Principal Sec-retary, Department of School E:Crrcation, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana- S0OO22. The Director, Board of School Education, Saifabad, Hyrte abad. Master/Principal, Government High Sch,: o , Dubbak, Siddipet 2 3. The Head District One CC to SRI C HAR| PREETH, Advocate tOpUCl Two CCs to GP FOR EDUCATION, High Court for the Srate of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies 4 5 6 BSR PVL HIGH COURT DATED:1711012025 CC TODAY -n--' -..--,: ,. ,.7 -. .. :: :: ' ,/..)-, a) .) :.) 4. \\\'' ,-/* --. t.ri: .., t--\\ -'::tt..-'- e))* 'sr) Iii ';1:i/' o],i ORDER WP.No.31643 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS H