High Court · 2025

4 T.Narmada, Wo Mr.T. Bhanu Prakash Reddy, Aged about 58 years, Occ Business, R/o Villa No.63, Splendid Aparna, Palm Meadows, Kompally, Medchal Malkajigiri District, Telangana State-500055.

5. A.Muralidhar Reddy, S/o A.N.Reddy, Aged Major, Occ Business, Flat No.202, Tirumala Delux Apartments, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad-500029.

6. T.Gangadhar Rao, S/o T.Nageswara Rao, Aged [Vlajor, Occ Business, Flat No.A-2, Landmark Enclave, Happy Valley, Road No.1 3-A, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500037

7. T. Krishna Kumari, Wo Sri.T. Gangadhar Rao, Aged lVlajor, Occ Business, Flat No. No A-2, Landmark Enclave, Happy Valley, Road No.1 3-A, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500037. B. L.V. Pratap Reddy, S/o L.Raja Reddy, Aged Major, Occupation Business, Flat No.110, VSS Nandadeep Apartments, Near Medchal RTA Office, Petbasheerabad Hyderabad-500055. 7 (Respondent N,rs.4 to 8 are not necessary parties) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 o'f the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order, writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of l\ilandamus directing the Debts Recovery Tribunal-1, Hyderabad to dispose of MA.No.27 of 2025 in O.A.No. 166 of 2019 read with R.C.No.'122 of 2022 as early as possible in accordance with law as per the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Siection 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Debts Recovery Tribunal-|, Hyderabad to dispose of M.A.No.27 of 2025 in O.A.No.'166 of 2019 read with R.C.No.122 ot 2022 as early as possible in accordance with law as per the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. FOR SRI M.SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI G.PRABHAKAR SARMA Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI N.BHUJANGA RAO, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERIAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: ORDER t I I a a 'a THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE I(. LAKSHMAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAI(RISHNA REDDY IVRIT PETITION No.31621 of 2O2S ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Si Justice K. Lokshman) Heard Sri E. Madal Mohan Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri M. Srinivas, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri G. Prabhakar, learned counsel for the respondent-Bank.

2. The present Writ Petition is {iled seeking to direct the Debts Recovery Tribunai-I, Hyderabad (for short, 'the Tribunal') to dispose of M.A.No.27 of 2025 in O.A.No.166 of 2019 read with R.C.No.l22 of 2022, as ea-rly as possible in accordance u,ith law, as per the time stipulated by this Court.

3. The petitioners have filed an application under uide M.A.No.27 of 2025 before the learned Debts Recoverv Tribunal I, Hyderabad, under Sections 19 (20A) and Section 26Q) e (3) of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking recall of the Recovery Certificate in RC.No. 122 of 2022 in O.A.No.1.66 of 2019, dated 02.07.2022. The said .- 2 application was filed only on 21.O5.2O25. According to the learned Senior Counsel, Debts Recovery Tribunal-l is not disposing o[ the said application in accordance with law. However, he has fairly submitted that the said application has been posted to on 29.10.2025 by the Tribltnal. In the meanwhile, during the pendency of the said application, respondent No. 1 is proceeding with initiation of proceedings ur.rder SARFAESI.

4. Referring to the docket proceedings of the Tribunal, learned counsel for the respondent-Balk would submit that the sairl M.A. is posted to today i.e., 17.10.i2025 and it is adjourned to 29.1O.2025. The Tribunal will have to verify the record and pass appropriate orders.

5. In the light of the above submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to dispose of M.A.No.2'7 of 2025 filed by the petitioners, strictly in accordance r.l ith law, AS expeditiously AS possible. However, liberty IS granted to the petitioners and respondent No.1 to raise all contentions before respondent No.2 in the aforesaid M.A., and it is for respondent No.2 to consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law. 3 6 Accordingly, the Writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Miscellaleous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/-P. PONNA KRISHNA ISTANT REGIS ECTION OFFICER To, '1 . The Stressed Assets Management Branch, State RTC Bus Stand Complex, Koti, Hyderabad. a k of lndia, 2nd Floor, The Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal-|, Triveni Complex, Abids, Hyderabad. The Secretary, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi, Union of lndia - 110 001 One CC to SRI N/ SRINIVAS, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI G.PRABHAKAR SARMA, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI N.BHUJANGA RAO, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERIAL OF lNDlA, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OPUC] Two CD Copies 2 3 4 5 Lr 7 BSR BS ) a HIGH COURT DATED: 171'1012025 ORDER WP.No.31621 of 2025 1HE Srrr k -) ,-) o ], o -1, 28 ttl 2ffi * (: DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS _q5 /sut \ t a a l t I