The High Court · 2025

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ. order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.6 in interfering into the peaceful life and liberty of the Petitionei and also interfering into the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No. 7 to 11 during the pendency of Civil Suits vide O.S. No. 284 ot 2025 on the file of Senior Civil Judge Court at HayathNagar and Vide O.S. No. 55 ol 2O25 on the file of Junior Civil Judge Court at Hayathntuzar, and calling the petitioner to the Police station and threatening to handover the plot of the Petitioner an extent of 201 Sq.Yards in Plot No. 293 in Sy. No. 236/4. 236/4A which is situated at Turkayamjal Village of Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and creating panic situation without having any jurisdiction during, the pendency of civil suits is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14. 15. 21 and 300-A of the Constitution or lndia and also violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No. 6 not to interfere into the Petitioners peaceful life and liberty and also not to interfere into the civil disputes between her and the RespondentNo;'7 lo 11 and not to threaten the Petitioner to handover her Plot during the pendency Civil suits. :1 OF 2O25 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No. 6 not to interfere into the Petitioners peaceful life and liberty and also not to interfere into the civil disputes between her and the Respondent No. 7 to 11 and not to threaten the Petitioner to handover her Plot No. 293 in Sy. No. 236/A, 236/44 which is situated at Turkayamjal Village of Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District during the pendency Civil suits. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR ,r Counsel forthe Respondent No. 1 to 6: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No. 7 to 11 : -- The Court made the following: ORDER N.V. Writ Petition No.32449 of 2O2E This writ petition is filed seeking tkre follor.r'ing prayer: "...d.eclaring the action of the l?csponclent No.6 in interfering into the peaceJul lilb and libertg of ttrc Petitioner and qlso interfertng into the ciuil d.isputes betu-teen the Petitioner and. Respondent Nos.7 to I 1 during the penderrcy of Ctuit Suits uide O.S.No.2B4 oJ 2025 on the file of Senior Ciuil ,Iud"ge Court ctt l-lauctLhnaQcr and vide o.s.,l[o. 55 ctf 2025 ctn Lhe Jile oJ' Junior ciuil Jud.ge court at HaycrLLtnagar arrcl callittg the petitioner to the Police station and threutening to twnd.ouer the plot of the Petitir',"' an extent of 201 Sq.Yrds., in Plot No.293 in Sy'No'236/ A 236/ AA which is situclted at Turkattantzctl village of Abdutlapurmet Mand.al, Rurtga Redcfu District (subject propertg) and" creating panic situation wiihout hauing arlll jurisdiction d"uring the pend.ency of ciuil sulls is Ltigltly illeqcLl, arbiLrary, unconstitutional qnd uioirttic-ttt oi' l^irticles 14, 15, 21 and 3O0A <[ the constittttiotT of India and also uiolqtion of the Principles o/ Ncttural JusLice and consequently direct tLrc llesponclent t'lo'6 not to interfere into the PeLilktrt<'-rs pectceJ'ul life and liberty ancl also nol to interfcre iruks the ciuil d.isputes between her and the Respondent Nos.7 2 to 11 and not to threaten the Petitioner to handouer her Plot during the pendency Ciuil sults... "

2. Hcard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 6. With their consent, this writ petition is taken up for disposal. Notice to respondent Nos.7 to I 1 is hcreby dispensed with.

3. The facts of the case in brief as stated are that petitioner claims to be absolute owner and possessor of the subject proprertv purchased uide registered sale deed bearing Doc.No.74 12l2O23 on the file of SRO, Vanasthalipuram bl.obtaining mortgage loan |fo* Tata Capital Housing Finance Private Limited. It is submitted that respondc:nt Nos.7 to I 1 who are realtors, approached petitioner to sell the subject land on a cheaper rate, however, petit.ioncr denied the same, as such, respondent Nos.7 to i I clevekrped grudge against the petitioner and hatched a plan to grab the subject plot. In that regard, Petitioner filed a surir in o.S.No.ssl2o2s dated 2l.ot.2o2s perpetual inlunction before the Junior Civil Judge J Court at Hayathnagar and the same is pending for adjudication. The respondent Nos.7 to 11 also filed a suit for declaration and pcrpetual injunction before III Addl.Senior Civil Judge Court at Ranga Reddy District which is also pending for adjudication. It is further submitted that respondent No.6 on one pretext or another is calling petitioner and his family members to Police Station and that when the said suits are pending, respondent No.6 at the behest of respondent Nos.7 to 11 registered a false complaint against the petitioner Cr.No.SO 12025 under Sections 318(4), 336(3) , 340(21 of BNS and is trying to handover the subject plot to respondent Nos.7 to 1 1. tt is further submitted that respondent No.6 approached to the subject plot and has I also threatened. the petitioner to handover the subject plot to respondent Nos.7 to 1 l. Accordingly, petitioner approached respondent Nos.3 to 5 and submitted a I / repre.sentation seeking to direct respondent No.6 not to interfere with the civil disputes pending between petitioner and respondent Nos.7 [o 11 Since no action is forthcoming, the present rx,rit petition is fited. 4

4. [,earned Assistant Government pleader for Home, on instructions, submits that respondent authorities are not interfering in thc civil dispute and appropriate orders be passed to that cffect.

5. In that vie'ul, of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent authorities to follow due i>roccdurc as contemplated under of law for further coul'se of action, il al1y. Respondent No.6 is directed not to interferc rvith thc civil dispr-rtes pending between petitioner and respondc:nt Nos.7 to 11. Miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, shall stand closed. However, thcre shall be no order as to costs. Sd/.C.DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I ./'(> //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, State of Tdlangana HYderabad.

2. inebirector.G"eneral 5f Police, Telangana State, Hyderabad. g. rhe commissioner of Police, Rachakonda commissionerate. 4. fne Oeputy Commissioner of Police, LB. Nagar Zone. Rachakonda Commissionerate.

5. fne Aisistant Commissioner of Police, Vanasthalipuram Division. Rachakonda Commissionerate. Commissioner'at€,.

6. The Station Hbuse Officer, Vanasthalipuram Police Station, Rachakonda 7. One CC to SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR Advocate IOPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 9. Two CD Copies . MMT PMK +* HIGH COURT DATE i2811012025 u ORDER i .No.32449 of 2025 ltiE S14 i6 a,' ,2 E ll0l, ilh ,r PA * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITON ' WITHOUT COSTS \ *b