✦ Telangana High Court

Mittakankal Village, Pudu-r lvtanOat,Ut<ariOa-d v. Judge's Pangi Court, at Vikarabad District

JUWADI SRIDEVI2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
JUWADI SRIDEVI

Provisions considered

Judgment

Cause title

ANO 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. By public prosecr.rtor, High Court, Hyderabad. 2. sri.lrladiga. Anthaiah, s/o.. L.,achaiah aged about.glyears, occ. Arir, R/o. H.No. 2-17 Ragadimamidi pally Village, pudu-r Mandal, VifaraOaO Oisttci.' Petition under section 482 ot cr.p'.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminir petition, the High court may be^ pleased to quash the proceedings against Accused No. 14 in c.c.No.603/2021, dated 14t7t2021 on the fie oJ tne court of the Junior civit Judge's Pangi Court, at Vikarabad District. ...RESPONDENTS

l.A; NO: 2OF 2022 Petition under section 492 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High corrt .av be pleased to stay of all further proceedings against petitioners/ nlcusea lto,i+ in c.c.No.603t2021 , dated 14tzl2o21 on the fie of the court of the Junior civir Judges Parigi Court, at Vikarabad District. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon considering the submissions of Assistant Public Prosecutor, High court for the state of relangana, Hyderabad on beharf of the State/ Respondent No..t . The Court made the following:

ORDER:

/ ORDER: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.101 14 ot 2022 When the matter is taken up, it is submittecl by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, that during the pendency of this petition, the case against the petitioner was disposed of in the trial Court, and hence, no fufther orders are required for adjudication in this matter. ln view of the aforesaid submission, this Criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/- K. BHAVANI SWAMY STANT REGISTRAR I I V' SEI]TION OFFICER To, 1 . The Junior Civil Judge's Pangi Court, at Vikarabad District 2. The Station House Officer, Chengomul Police Station, Vikarabad District 3. One CC to Sri. Subramanyam Daraboina, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Ona CG to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of felangana, -iL')o Hyderabad [OUT]

5.

Two CD copies PSl(gh Yk- HIGH COURT DATED:2610612025 I I ,.-:a:_:=:1\. i:\E .i Ia i- 2 0 s[P iltrf \./ ORDER CRLP.No.10114 ot 2022 DISMISSED THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS BatPCtA &",

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments