Judgment · High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioner for registration and admission into I\IBBS/BDS course under Management Quota "B'& "C' Category for the academic year 2025-26 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutiional and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner for registration for admission into MBBS/BDS course under lVlanagement Quota "8" & "C" category for the academic year 2025-26. lA NO: 1 OF 202s Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in tht: circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cc ut1 may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner requt:st for registration and admission into "B" & "C" for admission into l\4BBS/BDS cc urse for the academic year 2025-26, pendirg disposal of writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI L.RAM SINGH Counsel for the Respondent No.'t: SRI T.RAMESH, AGP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW Counsel for the Resoondent No.2: SRI RAVI, REP. FOR SRI T.SHARATH, SC F()R KNRUHS WRIT PETITION trtO: 31574 OF 2025 Betwee n: Vellanki Gracy Keerthana, D/o, Vellanki Venkata Krishr: Rao, Occ. Student, Aged about 'l 8 Years, No 11-2-23, Sri Nagar Colony, Paiwancha, Paloncha, Khamman-5071 '15, Telangana . AND

The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Ser; retary, Medical and Health Family V/elfare Department, Secretariat Buildingr;, Hyderabad-500 055 2. Kaloji Nararayana Rao University of Health Science;. represented by its Registrar, Warangal. ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndi,; praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the H gh Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action cf the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent in not considering the pelitioners request for registration and exercising web options for admission into !\4BBS/BDS course under Management Quota 'B & C" Category in on-goinlt or next phase of counseling for the academic year 2025-26 as illegal, arbitrirry, u nconstitutiona I and consequently direct the respondents to consider and perxrt the petitioner for registration and exercrsing web options for admission into |^VIBBS/BDS course under Management Quota 'B & C" category for the academic year 2025-26 in on- going or next phase of counseling. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioners request for registration and exercising web options under Management Quota "B & C" Category for admission into MBBS/BDS course in the on-going or next phase of counseling for the academic year 2025-26, pending disposal of writ petition.

With the consent of the learned cotrnsel for the parties, the rnatters are heard finally.

These '.vrit petitions have been liled by th€ petitioners seeking a direction to the respondents to permit them to \ register online, exercise web option and partit:ipate in the ) counselling process for adn-rission into MBBS/BDS course under Management Quota "8" category and "C"/NRI category" for the academic year 2025-2026 in the ongoing or next phase of counsclling

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that inadvertentiy the petitioners could not register for admission under Management Quota "8" category and "C"/NRI category. Therefore, the Univcrsitv is not permitting the petitioners to seek admissior-r under the said categories. They further submit that the petitioners be granted liberty to submit a rcpresentation to the Unirrersity with regard to their grier, ance and the University be directed to decide the said representation in a time bound maIIner.

Learned counsel for the University fairly submits that in case the petitioners submit a representation with regard I to their grievance, the same sha1l be dealt with by the University in accordance r,r,ith law. -)

In vieu, of the aforesaid submissio.r and in the peculiar fat:ts of the case, the Writ Petitions irre disposed of u'ith libe rt1' to the petitioners to submit a rr:presentation before tlie University u,ith regard to their grir'r,ance. Needless tc state that in case such a rcprcsentation IS made, the Llniversit5r shall decide the same r,'ithin a period ol'trvo dar.s thereafter. It is made clear that ,his Court has not expressed arry opinion on the merits of the case. Hor,,.ever, th,:re shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, i any, sl-rall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// V, OSMAN ALI BAIG STANT REGIS S ot- A \ To,

1. The Principa Secretariat B I Secretary, Medical and Health Fa uildings, Hyderabad, State of Telan

2. The Registra r. Kaloji Nararayana Wa ra nga l. ::ECTION OFFICER \ ily'Atelfare Department, -50() 055 Rao University cl Health Sciences,

3. One CC to SRt L RAM S|NGH, Advocate tOpUCl 4. One CC to SRt ABDUL KABEER, Advocate IOPUCI 5. One CC to SRt T.SHARATH, SC FOR KNRUHS IOPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR MqltCAL HEALTH FW, High Ccurt for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTJ w

fwo CD Copies BSR LS HIGH COUR'I' DATED: 17t1012025 COMMON OR DER WP.Nos.31546 and 31574 ot 2025 o ,(i c; ( 0) NI\J &t ,\ ':':o,.r1q.r;\: I DISPOSING OF BOTH THE WRIT PETITIONS, WITHOUT CO:STS \o J )