The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash in Crime No.91012025 on the file of Uppal Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate against the petitioners/A1 to 46 ''-, l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of further proceedings including the appearance of the Petitionersi A1 to A6 in Crime No.910/2025 on the file of Uppal Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, in the interest of justrce l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359 (6) of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the 2nd respondent to compromise with the petitioners/Al to 46 compound the offence by allowing the Criminal Petition in Crime No.910/2025 under section offences punishable u/s 126 (2), 115 (2),352 r/w 3 (5) BNS l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Pagadala Sunil, S/o Mohan Aged about: 38 Yrs, Occ: Ambulance Driver Fl/o 2- 22-3711, Adarsh Nagar. Chilakanagar, Uppal, Medchal Malkajgiri Diskict ... Petitioner/Complainant ANO

1. Shaik Abdul Raheem @ Chotu, S/o Shaik Abdul Khaleql Aged about: 34 Yrs, Occ: Ambulance Driver R/o H.N0.2-20-221121A, Chilkanagar, Uppat, Medchal Malkajgiri District

2. Shaik lmran @ lbrahim, S/o Osman Aged about: 32 Yrs, Occ: Fitness Trainer Rlo 2-20-84, Near Shivalayam Temple, Chilkanagar, Uppal, Medchal ' Malkajgiri Disirict 3. Shaik Rasheed, S/o Khaleel Aged about. 33 Yrs, Occ: Software Engineer R/o 2-20-G198, Near Universal Bakary, Chilkanagar, Uppal, Medchal Malkajgiri District

4. Akki Sandeepreddy, S/o Siddiramreddy Aged about: 34 Yrs, Occ: Real Estate, Business R/o H.No.2-20-157, Near, Bodrai, Chilkanagar, Uppal, Medchal Malkajgiri District

5. Palli Sunil Kumar, S/o Srinivasulu Aged about: 32 Yrs, Occ: lT Employee R/o H.No.2-2115/6/1, Near Bodrai, Chilakanagar, Uppal, Medchal Malkajgiri District

6. Kodari Suresh Kumar @ Akhil, S/o Chandar Aged about: 29 Yrs, Occ: Out Sourcing Employee HMWS, dD Colony, Hyderabad R/o Plot No.C/127V1, Near Petrol Bunk, Chilakanagar, Uppal, Medchal Malkajgiri District ...Petitioners/Al to A6

7. The State of Telangana, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana At Hyderabad Petition under Section 359 (2) of B.N.s.s. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to compound the offence against the petitioners/A1 to A6 herein by allowing the criminal Petition against the Crirne No g1012025 on the file of Uppal Police Station Rachakonda Commissionerate l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying.that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to extend the time to comply the conditioned of the order dated 1311112025 passed in crlp 13541 of 2025 This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Mancharla Vishnu Vardhan ,Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER i ..\ THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.13541 of 2025 COMMON ORDER 1. This criminal Petition is filed under section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6 in Crime No.910 of 202s, on the file of uppal Police station, Rachakonda commissionerate, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120(2), 11s(z) and 352 read with 3(5) of BNS, 2023.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6 as well as respondent No.2 that during pendency of the plesent Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.No.2 & 3 of 2o2s have been fited by the petitioners and respondent No.2/defacto complainant seeking permission to compound the offences and to record compromise in the above said Crime.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the compromise petition. 2 ITOJ l^k2 a 3ot2o25l.y'.d Cd.?.xaBgl db25 a-

4. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High court Legal services Committee for the State of Telangana vide orders dated 17.1o.202s passed by this court. The Secretary, High court Legal services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this court, the parties along with their respective counset have appeared before the High court Legal Services committee for the State of relangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 31.10.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion, entered into coryrpromise. 6- ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 202s are allowed. consequently, the criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in crime No.910 of 2025, on the file of Uppal porice station, Rachakonda commissionerate, are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the Telangana High court Bar Association, Hyderabad and Rs.5,,0o04 (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the High court Legar services committee for the State of relangana, within a period of ( \ 3 TIOJ 1.4f,62& 3of mzsh/.nd Crl.P.f,o. UY I of 2025 two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/.C.DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S OFFICER To, N- at LB Nagar.

1. The Vl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal Matkajgiri District, Uppat 2. The station House officer, Uppal police station, Rachakonda 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at 4- one cc to sri Mancharra Vishnu vardhan, Advocate topucl 5. Two CD Copies Hyderabad.(OUT) Sa/PSL "(Enclosed a copy of Joint Memo) Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Mancharla Vishnu Vardhan, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon,ble Court vide order dated 13.11.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Telangana High court Bar Association, Hyderabad, and Rs. s,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the High Court Legal Services Committe, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compriance USR No. 69 of 2026 dated 03.01 .2026 1 I I i! I l i I I HIGH COURT u ATED i1311112A25 TeQHE1 r 0 7 JAN 2026 * .4. ORDER l.A.Nos.2&3of2025 ln/and CRLP.No.13541 of 2025 ALLOWING l.A.Nos. 2 & 3 AND CR|M|NAL pETtTtON v '/- H rG H cou Rr t Ri,lvSEs#JFro n l.A.No. Crl.P. No- , 1 1 F ot 2025 of 2025 ' .: _1., ! ili"-lgrtg*glg,e*.*1* And Shaik Abdul Raheem @ Chotu Iio ihuu. Abdul Khaleel . . .Petitioner/ComPlainant rahim S/o Osman iltt ffiijt**n' ru:*::'''"' Shaik lmran @ lbt i;il;;J Iz vt"' occ: Fitness rrainer ffi#-;L j8r, u""'SnivalaYam remPle' chil ka nasu', u p p'J'n'rlilt'i rt"alkais i ri Di stri ct Shaik Rasheed S/o Khaleel -' j:i,m;"*Ym"il:*:i'lnn'nu' A?;ffi";ff i Uo*', ;;;;hal Malkajgiri District nrxi s un o.:8""+1I z:;'$::i [Ji"13] r,,i I ?:, Aoed about: 34' c h i I ka n a s a r' Ai"" ;t iG zzo - t' si' r'l I t"pli' iffi thut ttltumuisiri District Palli Sunil Kumar S/o Srinivasulu ffi fl ffif jn: ;t tj;i;[5n:i :' " " cnitut unagar, UPPa!'. . . . ffi;h;t Nialkaisi ri D istrict u'' P 9 9 t3 i " : ffig.f3tf :: ..Petitioners/A1 to AG fff;lfiHtt{i'l?i3*'i.,,"niliespondents,Deracrocomp,ainant 2

3. 4 5

6. 7 .: ..:,.!r1i;:::Y::?g:r,:li , I \i' # JOINT MEMO It is submitted that the petitio nerl2ndrespondent herein fired the present joint Memo to compound the offences as against the petitioners/Al to 46 as the matter is settled out of court amicably. For the reasons stated above, it is prayed that this Hon,bte court may be pteased to compound the offence against the petitioners/A1 to 46 n"rui, by allowing the criminal Petition filed by the petitioners/A1 to 46 in crime No.g10/20 2s onthe fire of uppal Police station' Rachakonda commissionerate, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Hyderabad Dated: 5.10.20t25 Counselfor respondent Counsel P RespondenVaccused Petitione /*#ondent g Respondent /Accused -4, S *4*€ +- Pa^:\ B-4 1 2,

6. i / .lrl *l 'i I I I I I I : ,j j I I ! i , I 1 I I