Hyderabad High Court · 2025

2. Smt. Thurpati Chandrakala, Wo. T. Chiranjeevi, aged about 56 years, Occ Housewife, Rl/o. H.No.12-1-29, Plot No.7, Vijaya Gardens, Bandlaguda, Uppal Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District 500068 CT amended in Criminal Petition as per order dated 1011112025 vide lA 412025 ...RESPONDENTS/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT s Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to catl ioi records and to quash the proceedings in FIR NIo. 1 O17 of 2024 dated 14.12.2024 on the file of Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Rachakonda, for the offences U/Sec.352, 115(2) BNS, 3(1)(r)(s) Sc ST PoA ACT 201s, against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1-3 in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in FIR No. 1O17 ot 2024 dated 1411212024 on the file of Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Rachakonda, for the offences U/Sec.352, 115(2) BNS, 3(1)(r)(s) SC ST POA ACT 2015, against the petitioners/Accused Nos.1-3, pending disposal of the above Criminal petition. 20F 2025 Between: Smt. Thurpati Chandrakala,, W/o. T. Chiranjeevi, aged about 56 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. H.No.12-1 _2.9, .P!o! !9J, Vijaya Gaidens, Bandtagirda, Uppat Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District 500068 PETITIONERS /DE.FACTO COMPLAINANT AND

1. Sri. Suravaram Sampath Reddy, S/o. S Prema Reddy, aged about 54 vears. Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.16-2-752, C-26, SBH Cotoriy,s6idabad, Hydeiabad 500059

2. Sri. Suravaram Prema Reddy, S/o. S. Raghava Reddy, aged about g2 years, Occ: Retd. Bank Employe-e, R/o. H.No.16-2-752-, C:26, SBH C6tony, Saidabad, Hyderabad 500059

3. Sri. Sambaraju Pavan Kumar, S/o. S Venkata Rama Rao, aged about 45 fealg: Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.16-2-7521211321A, Triveni Nagar, Gaddiannaram, Saidabad, Hyderabad 500059

4. Jhe_ State of . Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, through S.H.O. P.S. Chaitanyapuri RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED Nos.1-3 RESPONDENT Petition under Section 359 (1) of the BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant permission to record the compromise statement and quash the Crime in FIR No. 1017 oI 2024 dated 14112t2024 is registered on the file of Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Rachakonda, for the offences U/Sec.352, 115(2) BNS, 3(1)(0(s) SC ST POA ACr 201S, against the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 -3, in the interest of justice. Smt. Thurpati Chandrakala, Wo. T. Chiranjeevi, aqed about 56 vears. Occ Housewife, Fi/o. H.No.12-1!.9, .P!o!-!9.2, Vijaya Gafoens, Bandtagirda, lJppat Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District 500068 PETITIONERS /DE.FACTO COM PLAINANT / AND

1. Sri. Suravaram Occ: Business, 500059 Sampath Reddy, S/o. S Prema Reddy, aged about 54 years, R/o. H. No .1 6-2-7 52, C-26, SB H Colony,Saidabad, Hyderabad

2. Sri. Suravaram Prema Reddy, S/o. S. Raghava Reddy, aged Occ: Retd. Bank Employee, R/o. H.No.16-2-752, C-26 Saidabad, Hyderabad 500059 about 82 years, SBH Colony,

3. Sri. Sambaraju Pavan Kumar, S/o. S Venkata Rama Rao, years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.16-2-7521211331A, Gaddiannaram, Saidabad, Hyderabad 500059 Triveni about 45 Nagar,

4. The State of Telangana, Rep. by Judicature at Hyderabad, through S.H its Public Prosecutor, High Court of O. P.S. Chaitanyapuri RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED Nos.1 -3 RESPONDENT Petition under Section 359 (1) of the BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise statement and quash the Crime in FIR No. 1O17 of 2024 is registered on the file of Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Rachakonda, for the offences U/Sec.352, 115(2) BNS, 3(1XrXs) SC ST POA ACT 2015, against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1-3, pending disposal of the above Criminal petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Srinivasa Rao Pachwa, Advocate for the Petitioners in Crl.Petition and Respondents 1 to 3 in t.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 and the Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.1 in Crl.Petition and'Respondent 4 in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 and of. Ms. Kanya Kumari, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 in Crl.Petition and Petitioner in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 o12025 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER s IN THE HIGH COURT F.OR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT I{YDERABAT) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENryAS RAO I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O25 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.13655 of 2or25 Date: O5.L2.2O25 Between : Sri Suravara.m Sampath Reddy and two others. ....Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 to 3 AND The State: of Telangana represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, through S.H.o., P.S. Chaitanyapuri and another Respondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 3 se,:king to quash the proceedings in FIR No.1OI7 of 2024 of Chaitanyapuri Police Station, registered for the offences under Sections 352, 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'the BNS).

2. Heard Mr. Ravindranath Chowdary Namburu, learned counsel for the petitroners and Ms.T.Kanya Kumari, learned counsel for respondent No.2, through video conference. t I 2 i

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that during the pendency of the present Criminal Petition, at the instance of the well wishers, relatives and elders, the parties have settled the disputes pending between them and entered into compromise and filed Joint Memo. Accordingly, the parties have filed I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2o2s seeking permission to compromise the matter and to record the compromise entered between them respectively.

4. This court uide order, dated 2310.2025, directed the parties i.e., the petitioners and respondent No.2, to appear before the High court Legal Services committee, Hyderabad, on or before 04. r 1 .2o2s. In compliance of the said order, the Secretary, High Court Legal services Committee, has submitted reports, dated 03.11.2025 and 28.It.2O25, stating that the petitioners and respondent No.2 were duly identified with copies of their Aadhar Cards. It is further stated that the parties i.e. petitioners and respondent No.2, have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise.

5. In view of the said report and also in view of the compromise entered between the petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the proceedings against the petitioners in FIR No. 1OLT of 2024 of Chaitanyapuri Police Station, registered for the offences under Sections 352, L15(2) of the BNS, are hereby quashed. \a _.rr, J

6. Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs.1o,o0o/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the High court Legal Services committee, Hyderabad and Rs.5,o00/- (Rupees Five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioners, within two weeks from today. Misceilaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. M.NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR b" SECTION OFFICER To 1 2 3

4. 5. 6. Pr/Sa The lV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate cum lV Additional Junior Civil Judgeat L.B.Nagar, Rachakonda. The Station House Office, Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Rachakonda. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High court for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to Sri. Srinivasa Rao Pachwa, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Ms. T.Kanya Kumari, Advocate IOPUCI Two CD Copies Note: Total Amount of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen thousand only ) has been paid by Sri. Srinivasa Rao Pachwa, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 05.12.2025 as Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) to the "High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 147300 of 2025. 4 @ .'r- 4 ,. { "*. '{ I 't s I *

5." , .? HIGH COURT DATED: 0511212025 COMMON ORD l.A.Nos. 2 AND IN/AND CRLP.No.13655 ot 2025 E 3 oF 2025 (:: .> (J 05 IAN 2026 * Pt. * ".Fj* ALLOWING THE I. s 'l AND CRL.PETITION ./ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD I.A.NO. oF 2025 IN CRL.P.NO. oF 2025 BETWEEN 1 2 3 1 2 Sri. Suravaram Sampath Reddy, S/o. S Prema Reddy, aged about 54 years, Occ: Business, R;/o. H.No. 16-2-752, C-26, SBH Colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad - 500059 Sri. Suravaram Prema Reddy, S/o. S. Raghava Reddy, aged about 82 years, Occ: Retd. Bank Employee, R/o. H.No.16-2-752, C-26, SBH Colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad - 500059 Sri. Sambaraju Pavan Kumar, S/o. S Venkata Rama Rao, aged about 45 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.15-2-75212L1331 A, Triveni Nagar, Gaddiannaram, Saidabad, Hyderabad - 500059 ...Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1-3 AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature At Hyderabad, through S.H.O. P.S. Chaitanyapuri. Smt. Thurpati Chandrakala, ffo. T. Chiranjeevi, aged about 56 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. H.No.12-1-29, Plot No.7, Vijaya Gardens, Bandlaguda, Uppal Mandal, Medchal - Malkajgiri District - 500068 ...Respondents/De-facto Complainant .l f May it Please Your Lordship' It is submitted that the present Crime in FIR No' 1017 of 2024 is 1. registered on the file of Chaitanyapuri Police Station' Rachakonda' for the offences U/Sec'352, 115(2) BNS' 3(r)GXs) SC ST POA ACT 2015' as I am well acquainted with the facts of the case' 2. The Petitioner respectfully submit that the allegations in the complaint are that * on 12' 12'2024 at 13:05 hours whle she was wo*ing in her plot situated at Sy'no'12g/1' open ptot admeasuring area: 592 Sq'Yds' she was constucting compound wall around the ploL Some persons by name Sampath Reddy, Prem Reddy & Pavan has came there and they intentionally stopped the progressive of work and they took the keys of the machinery vehicle by abusing the complainant in filthy language by humiliating the name of her caste as .,sannasi daana Ekkadi vachavu lkadiki,i and they have pushed her out of the plot, so that she received iniuries on her lefr hand and then she immediately went to Aparna Hospital for treatment' Today she has got some relief from pains and she came to Potice Station and lodged a complaint against them' Hence, the complainaft requested for the necesfiry action' Hence HR" 3. Basing on the complaint made by the defacto complainant' a Crime in FIR No. 1017 of 2rJ24is registered on the file of Chaitanyapuri Police Station' Rachakonda, for the offences U/Sec'352' 115(2) BNS' 3(1XO(s) SC ST POA ACT 2015. a

4. I also submit that the Petitioners and Defacto Complainant are known to each other in relation to civil cases pending before the competent civil court in O.S.No.804 of 2024 and O.S.No.198 of 2024 respectively. Both the parties have filed civil suits against each other claiming to be the owners of the suit properties in aforementioned civil suits. It is further submitted that the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1-3 and the De-facto Complainant have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding dated 30.06.2025 and agreed to settte the dispute which arose out of the pending civil disputes which and agreed to withdraw the complaint filed by the De-facto complainant. 5. I submit that during the pendency of the said case at the intervention of the elders and well-wishers the matter has been amicably settled and to that effect the defacto comprainant has decided to withdraw the same by firing a permission petition. Fufther, the Respondent/Defacto comprainant herein entered a memorandum of Understanding dated 30.06.2025, by duty recording the compromise. In view of the same, the Respondent/Defacto comptainant herein is praying to withdraw the case against the petitioners/Accused 6' It is submitted due to the intervention of the. erder and well-wishers both the parties i.e., petitioners/Accused and Respondent/De-facto compraint and came to an amicabre concrusion to withdraw the aregations and comptaint to settle the issue out of the court for which both of them agreed for which the comprainant agreed to withdraw the case and to that affect both the parties filed affidavit and arso joint compromise memo. Under the above said circumstances the petitioners and Respondent/De-facto comprainant herein herein. e prays that this Hon,ble court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in crime vide FIR No. 1017 of 2024 registered on the file of chaitanyapuri Police station, Rachakonda, for the offences U/Sec.352, 115(2) BNS, 3(1X0(s) SC ST POA ACT 2015 in the interest of the justice otherwise the Petitioners and his family members will suffer serious loss and hardship' 7, Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the compromise statement and quash the Crime Vide FIR No' 1017 of 2024 registered on the file of Chaitanyapuri .Police Station' Rachakonda' for the offences U/Sec.352, 115(2) BNs, 3(1)GXs) SC ST PoA ACT 2015, in the interest of juStice and pass such other crder or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case' Hence, this Joint Memo rl .10,2025 ffyderauaa Place: Counsel for the Accused Nos.l- +, Petitioner/Accusid tlo' r sSjl' Petitioner/Accused No'2 Petition Accused No.3 c Y z/"6*t nisponaeiv oe-%Xo -omPlaina nt Respondenv De-facto ComPlainant