Smt P.tV. Anuradha v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition uncier Article 226 of lhe Constitution of I rlra praying that in the circumstances st:rtecl in the affidavit filed therewith, th,r High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of lt/]andamus or any other api r' rpriate writ, order or direction, declarirg the inaction of respondents no. 2 t' r 4 in taking action pursuant to leg.rl notice dated 20-03-2024 made .'11 regard to illegal construction of compound wall of Block-A and Arch in lllrck'8, Diamond Oak Apartnrents, Near Doctors Colony, Nallagandla, Seriling l'r pally lv4andal, Ranga Reddy District in Vtolation of building permission granted ,: illegal arbitrary and agarnst to provtstc ns of Greater Hyderabad [Vlunrcipal Co':rrrration Act, 1955 and consequently direct respondents no. 2 to 4 to take ac t o I on petitioner legal notice dated 20 03 2c24 and to demolish said illegal conr - r und wall constructed in Block-A and. Arch in Block-8, Diamond Oak Apa rtr rents, Near Doctors Colony Nallaganrlla Serilingampally l\,4andal, Ranga [l::r ldy District being in vrolation of bu,ld in g permission. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition uncler Section 151 CPC praying that in ti 1' lrrcumstances stated in the affidavit frled rn support of the petition, the High C r;u i't may be pleased to direct respondentr; to consider petitioner legal notice datei l0-03-2024. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R.R. KALYAN 1 Counsel for the Respondent No.1 GP FOR MUNICIPAL T:MINISTATION & URBAN DEVELOPMEII'I Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI G. MADHUStJt)'\N REDDY, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No.6 to 8 & '10: Ms. ASHR|Dltl{A The Court made the following: ORDER . -: . ,e"':.'^{ I : HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE I]. VIIAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.34054 of 2024 ORDER: (OttAL) This u,rit petition is lilcd by the pctititrncr seeking to dcclarc thc inactioLr of rcsponclcnts Nos.2 to 4 in acting upon tlle couplaittt clatccl

20.03.2024 u.ith rcgard to illegat constructiou o1'compountl r"all in Block-A ancl .,\rcli in Btock-B ol Dianroncl Oak .,\partnrcnts, by rcsponclents Nos.5 to l0 in deviation of sanctionccl plan llr/t' Permission No.4(r396/llOlW7.lC.i-11/20 I-i clated l7.lll0 I5 autl bv illegallrl, occupl,ing the land ol thc petitioner artd Govcr-nrtrcnt land given lbl approach road to GHMC, ad-lacent to tl-re land in Survcy No.12(r (Paft). situated in Nalagandla Village, Serilirrgampally Manclal, t{anga Rcddy District, as being illegal and arbitrary, and against tcr provisions of the Circater l{ydelabad Municipal Corpor-ation Act, 1955 (tbr short 'Act')

2. Hcard Vlr. li..R.Kalyan, lcarned counsel tirr thc lrctitioner; Mr. G.Madhusudan llcddy, learnecl Standing Counsel tbr GHN'IC, appearing fbr rcspondents No.2 to 4; I\{s. Ashridhha, learncd cor"rnsel fbr respondents No.6 to 8 and t0; and perused the rnatelial on record l 3 ltrc clrsc ()l thc pctitioner is th.rt oliginalll, Ms \ rr r,rs r: ya Bai, thc nrothcr rrl'tlre petitioncr \\'as lhc ortlrcr and iloss'.'rr Lrl'thc- litnd adtlca:rrrrn,: ,\cs()--l(r uunta\ in SLnrcv Ntrs.lf (r- ir rr rl I Nalir,,antil.r Villrrrc. Scrilinranrp;rllr \iandal. [{angi I t:cltlv [)istrict Itar in-t prrlclur;r.'ti thc sarr.rc Lrrrtlcr rcr:istcLccl sal .lccrl bearing doctrnicLtt \o. l()l rrl' l9(r5 [ltrnr orrc ( h. Mallaiah. u ri h is hcr sclt'- acquirc(l ptopcrtr. \1: S..lnirsrrvrr Ilui- clirrins hcr lifirrrrc. cxccutcd a l'egistclc(i u ill tlee,l bcurinLt riocut'.tcnt No 95 ol 199 I (i ti(l oi 08.I99l bcqrLcathinl the :r-rb.jcct pl()l)crt,\ in lavour' ,,l hcr sous and hor d a r.ru lr C irrclurling thc pctrtiorrcr lierein. , l'.rt irs pcl- the registcrc(l rr ill tlceil. thc pctitiorrcr becarne the os'r o l' Lhc larld acitrcasurin! .,\,-::. 1 l6 guutas. LjPorr clcath of N4s. 'l rsuya llai on

1.1.0 l.l9t)1. tlrc petitioncl inhcr rtr:ti tlrc subjcct propclr\ antl hacl bcen peacclirl I)()s:cs\i()n and cn.jo,. r'rrcrrt ol'thc sarne . [t Lrtrnri(tecl tlrat an extcltt ol 2S('l \(lLlilt'c )'ilr'(l:' irt Strlr cy No. [2(r and ' ryus giycp to rcsptr nclcn t No li r dcvcloPntcnt iur(l c()ltstruction ot'I l)lllu)cltts under rcgistclc(l tlcVclopnrcnl allrccutc n ( cu lll general po,c ol' attomey (DAGT',A) bcari rr l (l(rcunreLrt No.llTr) rrl'20 I,1 datcd l' . 2 2014 along u,ith sult;rlcnrcr rlurr tlcvcloplt)clll ilgrccntent culn gi 'i lal po\\,'ct of attorncy (SDA,lil'r\) Lrearing docunrent No.2379,,t 20 14 dated :-.-"-;,;--7 l ! I , l -)

18.12.2014. Ancl thcreupon, respondenI No.5 constr-uctecl Block-,A ol the Dian.rond Oak ApaltLnents by obtaiLring pclntission liorn the (}HMC authorities yirir, permit No.,1639(ril{O lW Z, (.ir- l l /20 1 5 clarecl l7.l 1.20 I 5 Subseclucnllv. ilnother cxtent o1- (1678 sqr.rare 1,,arcls u ls given to respondent No-5 lbr developnrcnt unclcr registcr-cd DAGITA No.4547 of 2017 datecl 01.06.20 I 7. hccordinglv, basing on seconrl DAGP.,\, rcspoudcnt No.5 constructed the builcling in the subject property as per the GHMC Perr.nit No. llC2Oi 16851 20 18 clated

25.10.20 I8. and rccentlv r-espondcnt No.5 completcd the oonstruction of Block-B in saicl land. It is lLrrther submitted that the peritiorlcr \va s allottcd Flat No.i03 as per the llrst t)ACiPA.

4. [t is subnritted that tbr having approach r.oad to said apartnrenrs construcl-ed by rcspondent No.5 in difl-erent blocks. the laucl of onc Mr-. Dr. B.Narsaiah Sio I-ate B. Laxn'raiah to an cxtent ol' 72(r square yards was requilcd; responclcnt No.5 ncgotiated with l-rint ancl thc saicl e.xtent o1- Iancl u,as takcn foL c.lcvelopmer-rt under DApC,{ bearin-q docurnent No.l8l6 of 20 l7 dated 23.02.2017. Responclcnr No.5 has forgone 10,800 square fcct along rvith the relative lar.rcl thereof ancl the space in Block-A of [)iamoncla Oak Apartments in tavour o1' Dr. B.Narsaiah iLr licu ol 7?(r square yards. 'fher-catter, respondcnt \q!--'. :lliilr,,.i, .1 No.5 t-c-ucqotiate rl \\.i1h tlie petiliorler an(l olhe,. arld anothel' SI).{GPA bearing rirrcunrenL No.277 of 20t9 i{ated i(.12.2018 n,as ente rc<l into u Ircleb,. llrc sharcs betri ce n [hc or.r,ne r: r ](i responde ut No.5 ri'crc r-cvisctl iLr r icri, ol' r'c:;ltonilcrrt No.-i torgr' r: hrs sharcr in tarour of Dr. B N:llsailh. It is sLrtnlitLecl that rcsltondc Lt No.-5 reccntly conrpleted construction of LllLrck-B and has takcn u1, c )rlstrxctio[ of nttin entrancc.\r'ch firr Lllock-[], Bv rkring so. resp I lent No.5 has encroached upon thc Iand allocatcd to GIIivlC gir.en 1 rpproach road and also sonlc c\t.u[ of lancl lrclonging to thc petiti,. ) il and others -l'he said construclioll oI' r\rclt in Illock-B b}' respon.ir Lrt No.5 ls tn contraventiorr o1- thc: sanction plall and rcsponr ,t it No.5 has liighhandedly encloachcrl thc lancl allocateci to the GH',1 'and also the land of'thc pctitioner anri othels. lJoucver, it is statecl lr rt rcspondents No.6 to l0 hcrein. t,ho irrc ntcnttrers ol' []lock-A I)iamond Oak Apattlrerlts, ha',,c hiqhhanrlerllv and iltc,rall,,-, rr ithor,rt r ) |cnnissiorl, encroached upon ihc approacir road. rvhiclt * as givr: r lbr plovidir-rg access to tlre Apllnrent at the lintc ol constnlctioll, i n I also part of rcmaining land ol thc l)ctitioncr and har,e illcgalll, erer' : I a cotlpound wal[. Aggrievcd thercb1,, thc petrtioner issued lei'rl notice dated

20.03.2024 to r,rspondcrlts No.l to 4 to takc actiou r,r,r.l' regar.d to the ..;arr:,Xa:.:ay .: { illegal construction of cor.rrpourrd n.all by responclcnts No.6 to l0 in ) Block-A and Arch by respondent No.5 in Iltock-B by occLrpvine part of his land and rlso thaL ot'Covemrncnt \\.hich was given lbr altproach road tbr- the vcry salne apartmcnts. Iio*,ever, no action has been initiatcd till datc, as such, the pcritioner is constrained to approach this (lourt. -5. Lcarncd Sranding Clounsel lor Cil lMC subn-ritted that pursu:ll)t to tl're conrplaint of the petitioner. shon, causc notice dated 2,1.0 t.2025 rvas issucd to lcspondcnts No..5 to l0 dir-ccting thcm to submit thciL explanation as to \vhy thc clev iat ions i unaLrthorized constr-uctiou rrade by thent i.c. "Constrr-rclion of r\ rcli( Landscape) anct Garclcning in llont of Dianrond Oak-ll block ar the entr-ance in Open land in Sy.No.1 27(P), 79,80,87.90,91.92,124 ol Nallaganclla(V), Srilingampally(M ) " should not be dcmolished. Leamecl Standing Counsel lurllrer subn'ritted that cnquiry pursuant to the shor.v causc notice u,ill be con'rpleted as expeditiorLsly as possible in accordance with la\\'.

6. 'i'he Deputy Commissioner, Circle-20, GHMC, ls suo moto impleaded as respondent No.l I in this u,rit pctition \ \...**r${1,r" -- 6 1 . -l-aking noto of thc tact that Lhc shorv cau .,,. nolicc dated

24.0 t.2025 has alreaclv bcen i:isued to respondcn . ;r-o.5 to 10, pul'sLtant to the cronrPlaint ol-thc |ctitioncr, this r.vlit pettti ,rt rs disposed ol dirccting respourlcnl \o. I I tt, ,-rolnl)lc1c thc cnquirr I r':uant to tlte shorv causc noticc clatcd 2+ () I 2.(-)l), ancl pass allllro .r lc order.s by atlirrcling opporlunitv o1'hcaliur: to tlrc Pctitiotrcr anrl r,'.1 r)t1(lcnts No.5 to l0 in accorcl.rr.rcc rr ith lau. as cxpctlitiousl-i, as 1'rt ,. 51e . ri,ithin a pcriod of lbur (4) u,ccks llonr tlle clatc of rcceilrt ol :r copy o1'this orc{er. 'lhcr-c shall bc no orclcr ils 1o co\l\ As a sequcl thercto, ntisccllaueous applicatior-rs. t-anr, pcncling in this rvrit pctition shall staud closccl /iTRUE GOPYi/ :. ] \1, oS\I{N ALI I]AIG ..,, iS I',.\N I REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 o 10 A> rvlunrcipaI Administration, rh': s tate of relansana, J!3r5#iifilrto".r",r"iliry' The Commissioner. The Greater Hyclerabad tvlunicipa : crporation, Hyderabad. The Chief City planner, Office of GHIr4C, Hvoerabad The Zonal Com.nissioner w"rlzon" c*utic: S;;;;(, r rpalty. Hyderabad The l\'4anaging Director. pritnvi RamihJiy's;""R "K;l ..e Kumar Reddv Sri ,b?;l " Hrmaghna Constructions pvt Address PIot No ze1| n ar,l-toor.. H;;iN;"i0B,iJ ,, Hrls Hyderabad. P19 99 !o gll B B KALYAN nuuo.rtu roFub"r" "" une cc to SRt G TVADHUSUDAN REDdV S'dior cr r/ 3 IOPUC] 9"9 99 to r\4s ASHRIDUHn novoiaie bpuicl'"' "' ?Hyii"ssFJf BN BS ?ty3|J3i#;r,,uF:l+1:?U,f l,t'0i .Ltd A_g;;;;i 3u y;; B-r;;;;, " HIGH COURT DATED:1611O12025 CC TODAY ORDER WP.No.34054 of 2024 ,c .J I I ( -t ;J-ii4 2 riil 2fr6 z P ., \J T(. L DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS T ln '1