Gangula Sathish v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly .one in. the nature of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondent No-S in interfering into the peaceful life and liberty and also intervened into the matrimonial disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent No. 6 and calling the Petitioner to the Police Station and threatening to settle the dispute by paying Rs.10,00,0001 to the Respondent No.6 and also the creating panic situation and threatening to settle the dispute with the Respondent No. 6 without having any jurisdiction is highly illegal, a5bitrary, u nconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and also violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No. 5 not to interfere into the Petitioners peaceful life and liberty as well matrimonial disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent No. 6 and not to threaten him to pay an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- to the Respondent No, 6 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 5 not to interfere into the Petitioner's peaceful life and liberty as well matrimonial disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent No. 6 and not to threaten him to pay an amount of Rs.10,00,0001 to the Respondent No. 6, pending disposal of Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. UDIT NARAYAN REPRESENTING FOR SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, ADVOCATE Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 5: SRI R. LAXMIKANTH REDDY, ASST. GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.6: - - - - The Court made the lollowing: ORDER -47 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No. 31977 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief "...fo lssue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondent No.5 in interfering into the peaceful life and liberty and also intervened into the matrimonial dispules between the Petitioner and the Respondent No. 6 and calling the Petitioner to the Police Statlon and threatening to settle the dispute by paying Rs.10,00,000/- to the Respondent No. 6 and also creating panic situation and threatening to settle the dispute with the Respondent No.6 without having any jurisdiction is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and also violation of the Pinciples of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No.5 not to intertere into the Petitioner's peaceful life and libeiy as well matrimonial dlspules between the Petitioner and the Respondent No. 6 and not to threaten him to pay an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- to the Respondent No. 6, pass such other order or orders.. ."

2. Heard [\Ir. D. Udit Narayan, learned counsel, representing Mr. Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner and [t/lr. R Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 5 / .- ='.. .1 l \ lli./ 11rt-- 11 !l)2: 11 .1t. "r.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No. 5 is interfering in the matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.6 and is even insisting that the petitioner settle the disputes by paying a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- to respondent No. 6. Hence, the present petition has been filed seeking appropriate directions

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that respondent No. 6 lodged a report on the basis of which Crime No.176 of 2025 was registered on 14.10.2025, and the investigation is currently pending. He further submits that the petitioner's presence was secured only for the purpose of enquiry. lt is contended that respondent No. 5 has never interfered in the matrimonial disputes nor insisted upon settlement by payment of Rs.10,00,0001 as alleged, and that the allegations are unfounded. Accordingly, he prays for dismissal of the writ petition

5. I have perused the material placed on record

6. Having regard to the submissions of the petitioner and the contention that respondent No.5 is allegedly interfering in the matrimonial disputes and insisting upon settlement, it appears that the issues involved are purely of a private and civil nature. Considering lhe same, respondent No. 5 is directed to refrain from interfering in the matrimonial 1 disputes between the petitioner and respondent No 6 and shall not, in t NlR,/ ll".P. No. ) 1977 oJ 2025 any manner, insist upon settlement of such disputes by payment of money. However, any action taken by the respondents/police strictly in accordance with law and by following due process shall remain unaffected bY this order.

7. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of' No order as to costs \ To, Pending miscellaneous applications, if any' shall stand closed' SD/. A. SREENIVASA REDDY ISTANT REGISTRAR A //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER \ ate f Telangana,

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, The St Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The Director General of Police, Telangana State, Hyderabad. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Jayashan ka-Bhupalpally, Jayashanka-

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kataram Division, Jayashanka- Bhupalpally District. Bhupalpally District.

5. The Cl of Police, Mahadevpur Circle, Jayashan ka-B hupalpally District. 6. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] B. Two CD Copies BN PVI- W HIGH COI.'RT DATED:2411012025 ORDER WP.No.31977 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 0 II 1 //* J .) iJ i .9_ t oe TlrE s r4 t\ I ) 04 t'ou p5 .d+ |'atcxEo t