High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
The Government of A.p.,. reg by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretaraiat, nvOeraOaO. ' District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. Joint Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. Mandal Revenue officer, Shaikpet Mandal, Hyderabad. G. Satyavathi (died oer Lrs 16 to. 1g), Wo. G.V. Raju, Hindu, aged about 62 years, occ: piooerti'es R/o. ptoa-No.i'az,'"ia-vi "i;#,i, 4th cross, Mahindra Hills, Secunderabad. (R-5 is impleaded as per c.o. dated 20.04.2012 in wpMp.No.19814/08. 6. 9,r.t. Azizia Bee alias Shaka Mujee_b, W/o. Late Mr. Shaik Ahmed Bin 'ri:i,;: #l T shaik Rashid Amoodi. S/o. LaLe Mr. shaik Ahmed Bin Mohammed Amoodi. aqed about 32 vears .occ alsineJs,"iLliiiliii""r Hr.rt.-s-ii:rgil"'6i"ri Khandeel, AghapLira, UyOeraOaO, A.i. Mohammed Amoodi, ased 65 yg.aai, b;c io"r."-tio, 1 9 1, Char Khandeet, ngiapura,' HyOdriO"O,,iE-"" '.".il;;i';f I :
8. Shaik lrl;rhrro:d Amoodi, S/o. Late Mr. Shaik Ahme,d E ir Mohammed Amoodi, agr;d ,rtrout 31 years, Occ Business, resident of H.Nc. 5-6-.191, Char Khandeel, Agh tprura, Hyderabad, A.P-
9. Shaik W:rris; r\ roodi, S/o. Late Mr. Shaik Ahmed Bin fuloharnmed Amoodi, Occ Businel;s 'e,sident of H.No. 20-5-578, Fateh Darwaza, Hyrle rabad, A.p. 10. Shaik AbCul l(a :eer Amoodi, S/o. Late 4,4r. Shaik Ahm_.d Etirr Mohammed Amoodi, rgsC 46 years, Occ Business, resident of H.No. 1)-1-4361N7711, Osman B.:g r, []yderabad, A.P. '1 1. H.umera []e1;urr D/o, Late [vlr. Shaik Ahmed Bin Mohanrme(t ,qmoodi, W/o. Mr. IVohamrrerl Abdul Qayyum, aged 42 years, Occ HousehrtlC, resident of H.No. 10-5- 179, Ahmed Nagar, A.P.
12.Shaika Htre:e. Eegum, D/o. Late Mr. Ahmed Bin Mohanrme(j ,\moodi, W/o. Mr. Mohanrne,cl Jalaluddin, aged 31 years, Occ HouseholC, resident of H.No. 9-4-13612311\, (luli Qutub Shah Nagar, Toli Chowki, Hyderabad ,\.p.
13.Shaika Haleerra, D/o. Late tVlr. Shaik Ahmed Bin Mohanrmerl ,\moodi, Wo. Mr. Mirza Ftah:r:mullah Baig, aged 32 years, Occ Householcl, resident of H.No. 18-13-132i5153, Ahmed Nagar, Bandla Guda, Hyderabar;, A.p.
14.Shaik Saleen r\rnoodi, S/o. Late Mr. Shaik Ahmed Bin Mr:harrrned, Amoodi, g.Se.d 39 lirs, Ctcc Business, R/o. H.No.5-6-'191 , Char Khandr:el, Aghapura, Hyderaba,j. A F. (Responderrts 6 to '14 are rep. by their GPA Holder Mr. Shaik Farook Amoodi, S/,r. L;rte Mr. Shaik Ahmed Bin Mohammecl Anrc,odi, age 46 years, .Occ Business, r/o.H.No. 5-6-191, Char Khander:l Aghalpura, Hyderabad, A.l)")
15.9-. Sivararna Ft:rju, S/o. Ranga Raju, aged 56 years, Occ []usir.ess, No. 202, Mahalakshmi, F oad No. 3, Banjara Hills, Hydeiabad. (!R 6 to 14 & '15 are impleaded as per C.O. dt 28-6-12, ,n WpMp No. 1 5639/08 and 22337 110 respectively)
16. Gadiraju lrlurali l(rishan Raju S/o Late G.V Raju and G.Satvzrvathi, Hindu Aged abo rt 61 years Occ. Advocate and lnsolvency Profesr;ic nal Rl/o plot No.182 Rarvi C,crony 4th Cross Mahindra Hills Secunderabad
17. Gadirai_u l/ira llaju Wo lvluppala Guna Sekharam, Hin<lu A gi:d about 57 years Occ. [)crrlor Rt/o flat No.204 Sai Krupa Avanti Apartm,jrrt 4th Street West Marredp;rl y Secunderabad
18. Gadiraju Flarlha llaju Dlg Lgte G.V Raju, Hindu Aged about r)l| years Occ. Government Err ployee Rl/o Plot No.182 Ravi Colont4th Cross Mahindra Hills Secundera b:Ld : 00026 RR16 to 18 brcught on record as Lrs of the deceased Respondent No.5 as per C.Cl dl0,)10412022 in lA No.1/2019. l9.Shaik Fanrol.l r\roodi, S/o. Late t\4r. Shaik Ahmed Bin lVtoha n-.d. aoed 65 years, O<:c: Eusiness, Fl/o_ H.No.5-6-191, Char Khandr el, Ag'apura, Hyderabac. (Rl9 is impkraded as per C.O. dt. lSlO4t2OZS in lA.No.2/20251 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of writ of lt/andamus, declaring the Endorsement No.111844712003 dt. 25-4-2OO5 issued by the 3rd respondent as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constatution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring 1462.84 sq.mts in premises No.8-2-693/4, situate in Sy.No.129l45/D, (New sy.No.403) Shaikpet village, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, by directing the respondents to reconsider the issuance of no objection certificate in respect of the said property. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 141 92 0F 200s) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reconsider the issuance of no objection certificate in respect of the property viz. land admeasuring 1462.84 Sq.mts in premises No.8-2-693/4, situate in Sy.No.129l45/D (new Sy.No.403) Shaikpet village, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above writ petition. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 14193 OF 2005) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner either by fencing or other wise, in respect of the land ad measuring 1462.84 sq.mts. in premises No.8-2-693/4, situate in Sy.No.129l 45/D (new sy.No.403, Shaikpet village, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.VENUGOPAL, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. FOR Ms. P.KRISHNA KEERTANA Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 4: AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6 to 14: Ms. D.GEETHA Counsel for the Respondent No.15: Ms. S.V.INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent No.16 to 18: SRI L.PRABHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.19: SRI K.BUCHI BABU The Court made the following: ORDER HCNOURABI,I' SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KU\IAR Vg]lII PETITION N 0.11043 of 200 5 ORDER: Hearcl Sr i l'] \/enugopal, learned senior counscl ap pea''irg for petitioners attd l,: rl'ned Assistant Government Pleatl'er f or I le venue appearing fo: res;pondent Nos.1 to 4 and iearned counse I ap pearing for respondent NI,r 19. With their consent, this writ Pctitiorr is taken up for disposal 2 This rvril pctition is filed seeking the following pra) er:- "to dec'nre lrc Endorsement No.71/8447/2003 lt )i(tl D05 issued b,.1 tht: )'r respondent as being illegal, arhitranr ontt ttio'nlitte of Arti,le; 4 and 300A of the Constitution tf . ['rdin md ionsequ':n'11, C,rcct the respondents not to dispossess tht' pttitrtncr in respe':t ti th,: lantl admeasuring 1462.84 sq ruts it' prt:utse; No' 8-2-6b3,tA t'tLated in Sy.No.129/45/D, (Neu: St, '\to 4t)3), Shaikpc' ';iittge, Rond No.12, Banjara Hills, ftydernbnL', by tlireciin;q thtt t'spondents to recortsider tlrc issnance o.f nc oltltc iort certificate i t t. ,'e;Pect of tlrc said ptopcrty."
3. Brief fac-s;is stated in this writ petition are that thc p:litioner No.1 claims :o L-',t: the owner ancl Possessor of land to an e xter t of 38% guntas, situatel iri olcl S.No.129/45/D, BanjaraHills, lihaikl.'e r/i1lage' Hyderabad, I'ravLrr;.; purchased the same through registered sa e deed bearing docuncr( No.962 of 7962 dated 06.07 1962 Srbst quently, petitioner No. I t ame was mutated in all revcnue lecc'rds and the petitioners vze'e in Lreaceful possession of the subject prc'pcr.y. Later, the petitionels r nade an application seeking perLni.sr ion for ..,'.. . .21. t construction of a compound wall and servant quarter on the subject i property and the Municipal corporation directed rhe petitioners to obtain No objection Cerrificate (NoC) from the District Collector, Hyderabad. Subsequently, the petitioner on 31.10.2003 made an application and requested the respondent authorities fo issue NOC. However, responded No.3 issued Endorsement No.77/g447/2003 dated 25.04.2005, stating the following:- o i o ?' "The commissioner Munir !. ! u y de r a b a d i s r :l ? i 7 h,,, b y ; ;f",;;;;'', ;',"' ; ;'": approttar of pran [o*o,,:,!:'l:'"' for NoC opptied for l*-,,,:::{:iii::;;iii!:;';;;;!,;',,':;;I:i!; tona opp)ii"'1o, 'ir,,,i!",!"' ctaim-of applicant is Ihat the' oI Ptot^ No.12e/45.D of o"y,,,i ju't iu!,"ilii,'i)"li,"l!',t,, "'M,,i,i i ii " i!! !^l.y -: " u ie n ce' t h c ":,y, e p ro pe r ty in[ot ncd rr, ," rr|"ri"iuif,l.'!o""on o[ Hydtrabad is ,ri'",i|'lo'r'!"'r ptrmission in fauour of the applicant p:'' of P io t. N o. 2e 4/ A. i ii v,, t,,,, n,'u,;; ", t s soc i c t 11, R oa d N o t't s, ";"::;:": ",i,,,i, iii iii,";ii. ;;::.',, " " " " ^'.::" Aggrieved by rhe Endorsement No.17/g447/2003 dated 25.04.200s, this writ petition is filed
4. Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, Iearned senior counsel appearing for the pedtioners has placed.on record a copy of rhe /udgmenr dared 16.08.2077 passed by the Hon,ble Supreme Court in Dr.Grace Sathyavathl, Shashikant and others Vs.Andhra prabha publication and othersl, wherein the controversy a prece of land admeasuring 6205 Sq.meters in centers around ' lzors; ts scc zoo a { t ::3:: Sy.No.129/a5,/ tl in Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad and the llpa> (lourt had allowed the appeal by setting aside the order of the Division Bench and resto.rer.l trrr: order passed by the single JudlJe in rvr it petitions Nos 18353 axl25478 of2OO6'
5. Learn:cl s:nior counsel has also drawn attentior-r ol this Court to the ju<iglent dated 01.70.2019 passed by the llcn'bl: Supreme Court in lfhe (]overnment of Andhra Pradesh and other'; vs. Grace Sathyavalhv Shashikant and others2, operative uortion rs extracted hereundet' - "13. lVc tre therefore of the oieu that, giaen rlrc ertrnndinary fact:; of ttue case, we do not wish to driae tlu 4tpelinnts to one nLor: "ortnd of proceedings anC, therefore, in exercisL of our poTuer:; u rder Article 142 of the Constitution oi ltrain, t,:jzct the seconri ['itTtort thnt has been giaen to us and decLnre thtt tle land uhidt is ,u Suruey No- 19/P and uhich is marked i'r 'th' nap of the ;et ott,l S uruey Report as 'PQRS' is tlrc lnn,l titttt ts n:tunlly Stroetr ltc.129/45/D. This being the case, it is ctent tlnt the allotnt,trLt tmde to Andhra Prabha publications intrst I'c : c' aside, and ttc lrntd be delioered by Andra Prablu M.4 tlos.970- 924t2(t19 tn R.P.(C) Nos. 3793-3807fl078 in C.A llo;. 5442- 545ri r.)F ?.015 Publications to the appellants utthiit n ,eiod of eight t,tL:r:,is from todaY."
6. Lea rn :tl s:nior counsel would subrnit that the r;un e',' number in the afolesaic, iudgments and in the Present writ pet'tior i; one and the same rnci in the light of the above said judgments, r'a;5-'4 6, th. Hon'ble Siulrrenre Court, the petitioners intends to rt'ilhlraw the present writ petition ' 12019; 10 scc z:t; I t i:4ti
7. Recording the submission made by iearned counsel for the petitioners and in the light of the judgments dated 16.08.2017 and
01.10.2019 passed by the Hon ble Supreme Court in Dr.Grace Sathyavathy Shashikant and others Vs.Andhra Prabha Publication and others and The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others vs. Grace Sathyavathy Shashikant and others (cited supra), this writ petition is closed. However, Iiberty is granted to the parties to seek appropriate remedy as available under law, if otherwise aggrieved'
8. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs' //TRUE COPY' SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, PUC]
1. One CC to tr/s. P.KRISHNA KEERTANA, Advocat 2. One CC to SRI P.VENUGOPAL, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Ms. D.GEETHA, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Ms. S.V.INDIRA, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRI K.BUCHI BABU, Advocate [OPUC] 6. one ci to sRt L.PRABHAKAR REDDY, Advocate [oPUCl T.TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT]
8. Two CD Copies BSR g HIGH COURT DATED:1510412025 ORDER WP.No.1104.3 of 2005 '/:":=:- \llt' -- /. ) I \ 7_ \\ 6( a 1:I JUN 216 i\ )tc ,)AT 'J HEO t CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSiTS C'f"riuW