High Court · 2025

District THE STATION HOUSE qFllCER, 621 , 7-1 , 254, S.R.Nagar Main Rd, Srinivasa Nagar, Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangan6-50003g. BHEEMAGANI SUDHAKAR, S/o. Bheemagani Sammaih Aged about 65 years, Occu. Business,H N o. 7-1-396/2/10/4, Neat B.B Guda-park, Sanieev Reddy Nagar, Amberpet Hyderabad Telangana -38. b ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or orders, Direction or Directions to Declare the action of the Respondent No. 5 and his staff from interfering with this petitioners personal life, liberty and enjoyment without following the due process of law and trying to vacate from the subject property under the influence of Respondent No.6, as illegal, arbitrary, violation of natural justice, and violation of Article 3004, a r-', 1 14, of the lndiarl Constitution lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the r:i cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High courl may be pleased to directed the Respondent No.5 not to interfere into the civil rratter and forcible vacate the Petitioner from the Subject Property, pending d sposal of the writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI JASWANTH SINGH THAKUII Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 5: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRIIUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.31276 of 2025 .,. 1 ', ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Covemment Pleader for Home appearing for rcspondent Nos.1 to 5. With the'ir consc-nt, this writ pctition is being taken up for disposar at thc adrnission stagc i tsclf.

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking the following prayer:_ " to declore the action of the Respondent No.S and his stnff from ittterfering uith this petitioners personal lifc liberty antl enjirlinent roitlrcut Iollou_ting tlrc due process of lazo and trrying to uocnta frint tlu: strbjact property unde.r the inJluence of llesponditt No.6 a-s iltegnl, orbitrnry, aiolation of natural justice and oiolation of Articlc 30d_A tnd 71 of thc lndian Constitution.,,

3. Brief facts stated in this writ petition are that the petitioner has agreed to take land admeasuring 454 Sq.yards in ,,B.S.Residency,,, consisting of grou.cl floor (admeasuring 600 sq.feets), first ancl second floor (6000 sq.feets), on premises bearing No.7-7-396/D/D7/D2 on plor No.gA, in Sy.No.104, situated at Bahlool Khan Guda Village, Hyderabad, on lease frorn respondent No.6. It is further submitted that the petitioner and respondent No.6 entered irrto arr lease agreement dated 05.07.2025 in respect of the subject property and the same is valid upto 30.06.2030. Thereafter, some dispute arose betwee, petitioner ancl respondent No.6 with respect to the subject property. The case of the petitioner is that on 22.09.2025 at about 11.00 Am, petitioncr received a call from respondent No.5 police station and the petitio,er was directed to visit the police station and thereafter, the petitioner was regularly called to trre policc station. Further case of trre petitioner is that the respondent No.5 is I I i L l J lN. \ 2 interfcring in the civil dispute and is thrcatcning the petit'or er to vacate the subject property. Aggrieveci b1'the sat.nc, this writ petition is f lcd.

4. Learned Assistarrt Covermnent I'leader for Horr,: appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 prlaccd on record instructions issue<l Iri' Sub-lnspector of Policc, S.R.Nagar l'olice Station, w'herein it is subrnittec{ [rat respondent No.6 did not t.nade .tn1' cotnprlaint against petitioner arlci l:he question of respondent No.5 ir.rte rfering t[re civiI dispute does not ,: r'i re. It is f urther submitted that respondent No.5 neither interfered in the pe1 Ltroner's personal life and liberty nor h.ttl thrt'.rlt'treti tl-rc pctitioner to settl(] t rc dispute vr'ith respect to the subiect Pr()Perh.

5. Ilecording the subrntssions rnade by learned courl:,r I appearing on either side and without expressing any opinion on the mert s of the case, this writ petition is disposecl oI clrrecting tl.re respondent autho]'ii1ts to follow due procedure S contcmplatetl uncler law before initiatint; anv actiotr on petitioner and on the subject propcrly

6. Witl-r the above clircction, this writ petition disposed of Miscellaneous applicartions, i[;rnv pcncling, shall stand closerl No orc'ler as to To, //TRUE COPY// SD/- S.IVIALLIKARJUNA RAO ASI} STANT ryEGISTRAR ta- SECTI6( OFFICER 1 2 The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretarizrt, Hyderabad, State Of Telangana. The Commissioner Of Police, Hyderabad, Comman,j and Control Center, Road No. 12, adj. Puri Jagannath Temple, Bhavani rlagar, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana. ']&* \

3. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, DCP, AC Guards, l\zlasab Tank, Hyderabad

4. The Assistant Commissioner Of Police, S.R. Nagar Hyderabad District. 7. The Station House Officer,621 ,7-1 ,254, S.R.Nagar Main Rd, Srinivasa Nagar, Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana-500038. 5. One CC to SRI JASWANTH SINGH THAKUR, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOI\/E, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies BSR s- HIGH COURT DATED: 1511012025 I I ORDER WP.No.31276 ot 2025 CC TODffI' I r€S TI, ) c :'!r, \\' t\.- \ 1 0lT 2$6 (:) j Di,.-CV DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS 2{ t